I remember someone who said "people of the past had much more interest in the standing overhead press vs. pushing something from the chest while laying horizontal on a bench".
there were much less shoulder injuries back then as well, due to the balanced nature of prioritizing the OHP and using the bench press more sparingly.
really? seems like kind of an odd claim.
whatever, just being anal.
Im talking about the competitive lifters that competed with the press in competition, vs the bench press now. A few years back this was a pretty large ordeal, some coaches claiming the press injured lifters shoulders, and thats why it went away in competition.
There are actual statistics logged that have been posted many times in different places, showing the bench related issues vs the press.
The second argument that got dismissed was the press was pushed out of competition due to back injuries, which also is not true. It got too hard to judge fairly, as more lifters got more fluent with the torso lean and hip drive. It was too hard to tell if the knees actually did anything, and some countries that were "favorites" could get white lights, while others would get reds for the same thing.
either in a livespill or an article on tnation where the statistics are actually posted as well fairly recently, I believe it was CT that posted it. Its not hard to see though, go to 2 or 3 powerlifting meets, and youre bound to get to witness a pec tear, or a rotator cuff tear, from the bench press. This just wasnt as much an issue when there were/is a more balanced ratio of pressing.
edit: If my memory is correct, Starr also wrote some similar things via the press and shoulder health.