Author Topic: Starting Strength - Incorporating Half Squats Link..  (Read 21569 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Kingfish

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2190
  • Respect: +1528
    • View Profile
Starting Strength - Incorporating Half Squats Link..
« on: June 07, 2011, 01:08:01 pm »
0
http://startingstrength.com/resources/forum/showthread.php?t=24176&page=7
just in case i need to do some iphone time killing reading between sets..

good read by the way.
5'10" | 202lbs | 44 yrs
reach - 7'8" (92") |paused full squat - 545x1| standing VJ - 40"|

walk more. resting HR to low 40s. 

Daily Squats Day 1 - Aug 30, 2011 and still going.

Raptor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14620
  • Respect: +2539
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - raptorescu
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Starting Strength - Incorporating Half Squats Link..
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2011, 02:03:29 pm »
0
Hah, nice thread, I keep on reading.
Current PR status:

All time squat: 165 kg/Old age squat: 130 kg
All time deadlift: 184 kg/Old age deadlift: 140 kg
All time bench: 85 kg/Old age bench: 70kgx5reps
All time hip thrust (same as old age hip thrust): 160kgx5reps

Kingfish

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2190
  • Respect: +1528
    • View Profile
Re: Starting Strength - Incorporating Half Squats Link..
« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2011, 07:21:54 pm »
0
almost done reading...

thread had good potential until darqui messed it up by telling GOMAD peoples his twig weight. its downhill after that. :uhhhfacepalm:
5'10" | 202lbs | 44 yrs
reach - 7'8" (92") |paused full squat - 545x1| standing VJ - 40"|

walk more. resting HR to low 40s. 

Daily Squats Day 1 - Aug 30, 2011 and still going.

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9112
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Starting Strength - Incorporating Half Squats Link..
« Reply #3 on: June 07, 2011, 11:24:11 pm »
0
almost done reading...

thread had good potential until darqui messed it up by telling GOMAD peoples his twig weight. its downhill after that. :uhhhfacepalm:

lmao yup, that sank it..

Flander

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2706
  • One beast coming up
  • Respect: +312
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Starting Strength - Incorporating Half Squats Link..
« Reply #4 on: June 08, 2011, 07:41:56 am »
0
Read it this morning. Fucked my schedule. Was 2 hours late for training. Ha. Good read.

Dreyth

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +1060
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Starting Strength - Incorporating Half Squats Link..
« Reply #5 on: June 08, 2011, 09:52:03 pm »
0
honeybadger = adarqui?
I'm LAKERS from The Vertical Summit

D4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1172
  • Respect: +152
    • View Profile
Re: Starting Strength - Incorporating Half Squats Link..
« Reply #6 on: June 08, 2011, 09:53:34 pm »
0
honeybadger = adarqui?

AND reverse hypertrophy
Goal is to dunk.

Vertical needed to dunk: 40"

Current vertical : 38.5"

D-Rose Jr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 386
  • Respect: +34
    • View Profile
Re: Starting Strength - Incorporating Half Squats Link..
« Reply #7 on: June 08, 2011, 10:00:37 pm »
+1
Reverse hypertrophy is adarq
i think lance is honeybadger

Dreyth

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +1060
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Starting Strength - Incorporating Half Squats Link..
« Reply #8 on: June 08, 2011, 10:45:35 pm »
0
HAHHHA GOMAD GOGGLES FOR THE WIN!!!
I'm LAKERS from The Vertical Summit

TheSituation

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1335
  • Just remember me when I make it shine
  • Respect: +215
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Starting Strength - Incorporating Half Squats Link..
« Reply #9 on: June 08, 2011, 11:42:23 pm »
0
Damn I missed some good trolling
I don't lift for girls, I lift for guys on the internet



[7:31pm] adarq: ripp, being honest, it's hard for u to beat jcsbck, he's on fire lately
[7:31pm] adarq: he's just
[7:31pm] adarq: wrecking people
[7:31pm] adarq: daily




Say NO to Maroko

And also NO to anyone who associates with him. No Taylor Allan. No Adam Scammenauger. No Kelly Baggett. No Elliot Hulse. No Jtrinsey. NO JUMP USA


Don't PM me asking me training questions. I'm here for the lulz. If you want help, post on the forums and get help from all the members, maybe even me.

Dreyth

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +1060
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Starting Strength - Incorporating Half Squats Link..
« Reply #10 on: June 09, 2011, 12:08:40 am »
0
"Any athlete that has a legit TRAINED 36-38" SVJ started out with a 30-32+. Show us your data, and show us the video of the jump test method you use."

- Mark Rippetoe



LOLLLLLLLLLL ok so if you have a 30" SVJ already you can only increase it by  6" LMFAO.. that's only a 20% increase in vert...


mind you, I've went from a 27" RVJ to now a 38" RVJ over a period of 4 years. Mark Rippetoe has ZERO knowledge when it comes to vert training. What a tool.
I'm LAKERS from The Vertical Summit

Dreyth

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +1060
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Starting Strength - Incorporating Half Squats Link..
« Reply #11 on: June 09, 2011, 12:25:43 am »
0
My opinion is that half-squats are never a legitimate exercise for any purpose under any circumstances.

Any athlete that has a legit TRAINED 36-38" SVJ started out with a 30-32+.

I do not think partial squats are SPP. I think they are an ineffective way to train anything, because their mechanics are sufficiently different from normal human movement patterns that they are actually counterproductive.

You can't create "elite" jumping numbers (36"+) with any kind of squat if elite jumping genetics are not already there

And what the hell does bodyfat have to do with this as a training goal?

My rule of thumb in these matters is ABOUT 25% improvement in untrained vs trained SVJ, with emphasis on the S. I didn't make the goddamn percentages up -- they are the consensus of every high-level S&C coach I've talked to about this, every high-level athlete that has trained the SVJ for performance, and my own personal experience.

Half squats are used -- and their use rationalized in this way -- by coaches that do not know how to teach the full squat successfully, that have never disciplined themselves to learn and use the full squat personally, and that run typical shitty collegiate S&C programs that get by because their recruiters put enough genetics on the team that it looks like half-squats and Hammer Strength actually work.



- Mark Fucking Rippetoe
« Last Edit: June 09, 2011, 12:27:18 am by Dreyth »
I'm LAKERS from The Vertical Summit

steven-miller

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 879
  • Respect: +63
    • View Profile
Re: Starting Strength - Incorporating Half Squats Link..
« Reply #12 on: June 09, 2011, 05:36:52 am »
+1
Lakers, you are not reading appropriately - SVJ is not the same as RVJ.

I also think that people are not trying very hard to understand his position and where he is coming from. People just get into these discussions without an open mind and then get upset, like you are, that he is not accepting the idea that some athletes make solid increases in their SVJ without some form of prove. And he is rightfully so asking for it since those gains (let's say 30%, which is a number that has been used in previous discussions), despite the perception on forums such as this, are pretty rare. You could even look at the logs in THIS forum and on TVS and count the guys that increased their standing jumps more than 30%. There are people who did that, but if you think they are more than a small percentage, your perception of it is clouded.
You also have to understand that athletes on a board like this are a somewhat "special" population in itself. For Rip the SVJ is merely a diagnostic tool. People here treat it as their training goal. Those are two different worlds clashing together.

Those things should be discussed, but IMO this thread got quickly out of hand because opinionated people from both sides did not try very hard to understand the other side and could not get their heads wrapped around what was the actual difference in opinion. It's a pity that this is the case though.

dirksilver

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 296
  • Respect: +6
    • View Profile
Re: Starting Strength - Incorporating Half Squats Link..
« Reply #13 on: June 09, 2011, 09:43:58 am »
0
Lakers, you are not reading appropriately - SVJ is not the same as RVJ.

I also think that people are not trying very hard to understand his position and where he is coming from. People just get into these discussions without an open mind and then get upset, like you are, that he is not accepting the idea that some athletes make solid increases in their SVJ without some form of prove. And he is rightfully so asking for it since those gains (let's say 30%, which is a number that has been used in previous discussions), despite the perception on forums such as this, are pretty rare. You could even look at the logs in THIS forum and on TVS and count the guys that increased their standing jumps more than 30%. There are people who did that, but if you think they are more than a small percentage, your perception of it is clouded.
You also have to understand that athletes on a board like this are a somewhat "special" population in itself. For Rip the SVJ is merely a diagnostic tool. People here treat it as their training goal. Those are two different worlds clashing together.

Those things should be discussed, but IMO this thread got quickly out of hand because opinionated people from both sides did not try very hard to understand the other side and could not get their heads wrapped around what was the actual difference in opinion. It's a pity that this is the case though.

i agree with that though i would say more of the stiff neckedness was on rips side

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6059
  • Respect: +3838
    • View Profile
Re: Starting Strength - Incorporating Half Squats Link..
« Reply #14 on: June 09, 2011, 10:07:38 am »
0
Lakers, you are not reading appropriately - SVJ is not the same as RVJ.

I also think that people are not trying very hard to understand his position and where he is coming from. People just get into these discussions without an open mind and then get upset, like you are, that he is not accepting the idea that some athletes make solid increases in their SVJ without some form of prove. And he is rightfully so asking for it since those gains (let's say 30%, which is a number that has been used in previous discussions), despite the perception on forums such as this, are pretty rare. You could even look at the logs in THIS forum and on TVS and count the guys that increased their standing jumps more than 30%. There are people who did that, but if you think they are more than a small percentage, your perception of it is clouded.
You also have to understand that athletes on a board like this are a somewhat "special" population in itself. For Rip the SVJ is merely a diagnostic tool. People here treat it as their training goal. Those are two different worlds clashing together.

Those things should be discussed, but IMO this thread got quickly out of hand because opinionated people from both sides did not try very hard to understand the other side and could not get their heads wrapped around what was the actual difference in opinion. It's a pity that this is the case though.

i agree with that though i would say more of the stiff neckedness was on rips side

x2

I agree with steven-miller views on being open minded , differencing a general athlete from a VJ-trainee , seeing the big pic with SVJ possible progress etc.
But rippetoe is less openmided in this case for sure , those statements are provoking arrogant.

Just 2 cents from someone ( not an athlete , not even close ) who took his SVJ from ~20'' to ~30,5'' ( just a bit above 50% improvement ) squatting mostly above parallel.
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?