Author Topic: ADARQ's journal  (Read 2584183 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Natho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 460
  • Respect: 0
    • View Profile
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #870 on: June 19, 2010, 06:46:40 am »
0
You should measure the distance from the tip of your finger to the bottom of your chin, cause thats how high you jumpes, it wont be 100% accurate but hey, what is...... :D get back to me if you do
Current highest touch = 11'4" (37"-38")
Squat = 140kg x5
             160KgX1
Weight = 97kg
Height = 6'3"
Reach = 8'2"-8'3"

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9112
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #871 on: June 19, 2010, 06:54:16 am »
0
You should measure the distance from the tip of your finger to the bottom of your chin, cause thats how high you jumpes, it wont be 100% accurate but hey, what is...... :D get back to me if you do

my hand is about 8 inches, my head seems to be like 12 inches (just estimating).

ya i dno how high those are but, im actually thinking the rim is EXACTLY 8' (or 8'1), and my normal 96" reach was 95" because I was in track flats not basketball shoes.. so height would be 72", reach 95", rim 96".

so ya, whatever that is lol.. so just grazing the top of my head to the rim would be 24".. im getting like 10-12" over or so ?

ya dno, but im happy with the jumps, was surprised when i saw the footage.




peace man!

im off to sleep.

Natho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 460
  • Respect: 0
    • View Profile
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #872 on: June 19, 2010, 06:56:30 am »
0
get tez tape a measury ting, ahhh start at beard level, ahhhhh got to finger ahhhh.....WALAHH

just messin around nice jumps regardless heavenly i might add, i have exams so ill do your math later  ;D  :D  ;)
Current highest touch = 11'4" (37"-38")
Squat = 140kg x5
             160KgX1
Weight = 97kg
Height = 6'3"
Reach = 8'2"-8'3"

spikejon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 105
  • Respect: 0
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #873 on: June 19, 2010, 07:03:08 am »
0
Chin to rim ftw! ;D.

Definetly some nice jumps!

Natho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 460
  • Respect: 0
    • View Profile
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #874 on: June 19, 2010, 07:08:23 am »
0
spike just reminded me......

when you were trolling that 15 year old, YOU WERE NOT LYING, LORD DARQMAN CAN GET HIS CHIN TO THE RIM, wtf was that kid on about ^^^^^^^^proof......



maybe that kid should know what rim your specifying......pffftt......punk ass teenagers....
Current highest touch = 11'4" (37"-38")
Squat = 140kg x5
             160KgX1
Weight = 97kg
Height = 6'3"
Reach = 8'2"-8'3"

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9112
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #875 on: June 19, 2010, 03:43:28 pm »
0
spike just reminded me......

when you were trolling that 15 year old, YOU WERE NOT LYING, LORD DARQMAN CAN GET HIS CHIN TO THE RIM, wtf was that kid on about ^^^^^^^^proof......



maybe that kid should know what rim your specifying......pffftt......punk ass teenagers....

ya exactly i meant 8' fisher price rims!

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9112
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #876 on: June 20, 2010, 03:28:54 am »
0
no workout today, was 156 before i went to movie/eat.. 160 after hahah.. gonna workout very hard tomorrow hopefully:

workout #1 = dunks
workout #2 = sprints/lunges/other bodyweight stuff etc

vid from last night:

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j324MgQCoMM" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j324MgQCoMM</a>

posting some more pics, i think i love head height jumps:






adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9112
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #877 on: June 21, 2010, 05:59:40 am »
0
THE PLYO KING IS BACK!

6/20/2010

weight 156

father's day + rain ruined my workout, so i improvised..

workout:
- 10 yard sprints: 5 max effort, bunch of warmups
- some drop step jumps, like 3 x 5
- 30" table jumps: like 2x10
- 18" depth jump to 30" table jump: 1x10, 1x20
- 30" depth jump to 30" table jump: 1x5, 1x10, 1x10
- neutral grip pullups: power rack was wet so grip slipping, 12
- deep bar dips: 10
- pmghr's: best set so far, 1x6 or so
- pushups: 35

im actually pretty happy to have done the depth 'box' jumps.. minimized alot of impact (took out the second landing), which on the surface i'm dj'n on is pretty important..

the 30" dj's to 30" box were so reflexive and i was getting real good bounce..

left vmo + calfs/achilles are fatigued, good sign!

peace

bball2020

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 644
  • Respect: +66
    • View Profile
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #878 on: June 21, 2010, 12:16:07 pm »
0
going from that high height of a depth jump height, do you feel you still gain alot from an explosive strength stanpoint even though it is more "reactive" since your rebounding onto a box?

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9112
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #879 on: June 21, 2010, 03:57:05 pm »
0
going from that high height of a depth jump height, do you feel you still gain alot from an explosive strength stanpoint even though it is more "reactive" since your rebounding onto a box?

well i've always preferred regular DJ's rather than DJ's onto boxes/over hurdles for exactly that reason you stated.. DJ's over hurdles/onto boxes are great for people with sprinting emphasis, but for vert enthusisitists (sp) they lack that complete triple extensions and highest touch stimulus... so I PREFER normal dj's for vert, of course there is nothing wrong with incorporating both methods but one should be incorporated alot more than the other based on your goal: sprinting or jumping... so ya I feel dj's onto boxes/over hurdles are less of an explosive strength adaptation and more of a stiffness/reactive adaptation.

one very nice aspect of dj's onto boxes/over hurdles though, is there decreased specificity to jumping.. for me, this is a good thing, because I burn out on jumping quick in my brain.. for example, if i go dunk monday, well it's pretty impossible for me to dunk tuesday, i might be fresh wednesday, but i'll definitely be fresh thursday.. so these forms of dj's are working other parts of those cortical areas in the brain responsible for jump programming, which should allow me to get in some extra work without burning out my "highest touch/highest head head + runup jumps"..

also, it minimizes the TWO impacts.. I was only getting one major impact landing (the drop from the box), then i'd land on the bench, so I cut my plyo-shock-impact in half :D....

so ya i like what i did last night and will probably try and do it again tomorrow just to see what's up.. might start incorporating that alot more.. my shins/calfs/achilles/quads do feel pretty worked as i woke up this morning, but i feel very strong and have some stim from it.

peace man!

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9112
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #880 on: June 22, 2010, 12:58:30 am »
0
i havn't been eating good the last few days and it showed on tonight's dunk session, though I had a few really good jumps, this is the best one, two frames of it, 26 frames from triple extension to first contact with ground on landing, which is basically 35 RVJ or 36 i forget, i'll have to put it in my hangtime calculator on here: 26 * .033 = .856 or something

here's the PEAK of the jump, but possibly slight cam angle distortion:






here's the frame right after that, as i start coming back down, less camera angle distortion:


nba8340

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 696
  • Respect: +8
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #881 on: June 22, 2010, 01:12:59 am »
0
shit that's high

spikejon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 105
  • Respect: 0
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #882 on: June 22, 2010, 04:02:41 am »
0
Haha, predicted you'd get a 35". Any makes yesterday or only misses?

Anyway nice jumping once again  ;D.

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9112
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #883 on: June 22, 2010, 04:51:36 am »
0
Haha, predicted you'd get a 35". Any makes yesterday or only misses?

Anyway nice jumping once again  ;D.

you were definitely correct man, good prediction :) i would have had much more good jumps across the board but my power endurance/strength endurance was gone, too few calories yesterday.


well i made 3, but they are kinda whack i think i really havn't looked them over much, just got done food shoppin!

gonna check them out now.. that was definitely my highest jump of the night, this kid i knew who was watching, his response was like "daaaaaamn" hehe! i had tried 3 dunks before that and he was not too impressed, but on that one he was real impressed.. so thats funny, i knew i hit a nasty jump on that one.

im pretty sure thats the dunk that i strained my forearm with too.. i strained it bad during one dunk attempt, was bugging the rest of the session.

ill check them all out now and upload some vid on my adarqtv account tomorrow :D

peace

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6059
  • Respect: +3838
    • View Profile
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #884 on: June 22, 2010, 05:03:17 am »
0
sick jump!!!

ill go for : rim 4'' below palm - hand tip 12'' above rim - 11' touch - 35'' RVJ , too distorted , could be 0,5'' higher , no way lower!
« Last Edit: June 22, 2010, 05:14:02 am by vag »
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?