Turning this into:
Race Strategies- Going to map some of this out for mile & 5k
- Fairly interesting.. different methods to achieve various end results
mile:- going with mile = 1600m
mile @ 5:00
- even-splits: 75 x 4
- half: 2:30
mile @ 4:5X
- even-splits: 72.5-74.9 x 4
- half: 2:25-2:29
mile @ 4:4X
- even-splits: 70-72.4 x 4
- half: 2:20-2:24
mile @ 4:3X
- even-splits: 67-69.9 x 4
- half: 2:15-2:19
mile @ 4:2X
- even-splits: 65 - 66.9 x 4
- half: 2:10-2:14
fantasy land:
mile @ 4:1X
- even-splits: 62.5-64.9 x 4
- half: 2:05-2:09
mile @ 4:0X
- even-splits: 60-62.4 x 4
- half: 2:00-2:04
5k:5k @ 17:XX
- aggressive-2-miles: 2 mi @ 11:00 (5:30 min/mi) + 3rd mile could be <= 6:20
- aggressive-2 miles: 2 mi @ 10:30 (5:15 min/mi) + 3rd mile could be ?
- aggressive-2-miles: 2 mi @ 10:00 (5:00 min/mi) + 3rd mile could be ?
- aggressive-2-miles: 2 mi @ 9:30 (4:45 min/mi) + 3rd mile could be ?
- even-splits: 5:30 - 5:4??
- half: 1.55 @ 8:30-8:59
- big-first-half:
- big-negative:
- huge-first-mile:
5k @ 16:XX
- aggressive-2-miles: 2 mi @ 10:30 (5:15 min/mi) + 3rd mile could be 5:45-5:55
- aggressive-2-miles: 2 mi @ 10:00 (5:00 min/mi) + 3rd mile could be <= 6:20
- aggressive-2-miles: 2 mi @ 9:30 (4:45 min/mi) + 3rd mile could be ?
- even-splits: 5:20 - 5:27?
- half: 1.55 @ 8:00-8:29
- big-first-half:
- big-negative:
- huge-first-mile:
5k @ 15:XX
- aggressive-2-miles: 2 mi @ 10:00 (5:00 min/mi) + 3rd mile could be <= 05:20
- aggressive-2-miles: 2 mi @ 9:30 (4:45 min/mi) + 3rd mile could be <= 5:55
- even-splits: 4:50 - 5:08?
- half: 1.55 @ 7:30-7:59
- big-first-half:
- big-negative:
- huge-first-mile:
fantasy land:
5k @ 14:XX
- aggressive-2-miles: 2 mi @ 9:30 (4:45 min/mi) + 3rd mile could be <= 4:55
- even-splits: 4:30 - 4:47?
- half: 1.55 @ 7:00-7:29
- big-first-half:
- big-negative:
- huge-first-mile:
j-daniels vdot:-
https://runsmartproject.com/calculator/miles:
- 5:05 -> 3k (10:04), 2mi (10:52), 5k (17:26), half (1:20:00), full (2:47:11)
- 5:00 -> 3k (09:55), 2mi (10:42), 5k (17:11), half (1:18:49), full (2:44:46)
- 4:55 -> 3k (09:45), 2mi (10:32), 5k (16:55), half (1:17:34), full (2:42:12)
- 4:50 -> 3k (09:35), 2mi (10:20), 5k (16:36), half (1:16:09), full (2:39:16)
- 4:45 -> 3k (09:26), 2mi (10:11), 5k (16:21), half (1:14:59), full (2:36:53)
- 4:40 -> 3k (09:15), 2mi (10:00), 5k (16:04), half (1:13:40), full (2:34:09)
- 4:35 -> 3k (09:05), 2mi (09:48), 5k (15:46), half (1:12:17), full (2:31:19)
- 4:30 -> 3k (08:56), 2mi (09:38), 5k (15:30), half (1:11:04), full (2:28:47)
- 4:25 -> 3k (08:46), 2mi (09:28), 5k (15:14), half (1:09:48), full (2:26.09)
- 4:20 -> 3k (08:35), 2mi (09:16), 5k (14:56), half (1:08:24), full (2:23:16)
- 4:15 -> 3k (08:26), 2mi (09:06), 5k (14:40), half (1:07:09), full (2:20:41)
- 4:10 -> 3k (08:16), 2mi (08:56), 5k (14:23), half (1:05:53), full (2:18:01)
- 4:05 -> 3k (08:05), 2mi (08:44), 5k (14:05), half (1:04:30), full (2:15:09)
- 4:00 -> 3k (07:56), 2mi (08:34), 5k (13:49), half (1:03:16), full (2:12:34)
- 3:55 -> 3k (07:46), 2mi (08:24), 5k (13:32), half (1:02:01), full (2:09:56)
- 3:50 -> 3k (07:35), 2mi (08:12), 5k (13:13), half (1:00:33), full (2:06:53)
- 3:45 -> 3k (07:26), 2mi (08:02), 5k (12:58), half (59:21), full (2:04:22)
^^ those numbers are interesting. as the mile gets faster (<= 4:20 I imagine), the associated times don't match up as well. I think because you get people who just become so "specialized" at those longer distances, that they don't need as much raw horsepower.
might edit this later. did that off the top of my head so, didn't double check anything. could be way off.
ehehe.