your journal,
welcome back, sorry to hear you had what sounds like kind of a lost season.
Thanks mate! I have been following your training lately and it looks like you're hitting new heights, keep it up.
That sucks man. If it's any consolation you're faster than me atm, and I have one friend (10.94 100 & 21.69 200) who hasn't improved since he was 17- he's now 22 and he's been training with a coach similar to yours the whole time.
You definitely need to ditch that coach. 3.2km runs on Sundays and 2.4km runs on Wednesdays??? As for the speed endurance I"m not surprised that people would drop off by the 2nd set. Speed endurance is usually 90-95% so if you're exerting that kind of effort you really need to have about 15-20 minutes rest at least- 6-8 minutes is just ridiculous.
The Tuesday session sounds decent, as does the speed endurance; however, like I said you'd definitely want to incorporate more rest if it's true speed endurance. Same as the sled drags once again it just seems like a complete overkill on volume. Than to top it off he has you guys running a 400m to finish off the session
How did the rest of the squad go? Juniors might be able to handle that sort of volume and make improvements- but that wouldn't be due to good coaching it would be due to going through puberty. The reason you didn't get injured was probably because your body knew it couldn't handle the volume so instead of ceasing the volume it lowered the intensity as a natural defence mechanism. Hence, your times deteriorating and lack of power.
It seems clear where all the mistakes were this season. Sometimes less is more, which sounds completely counter intuitive (it's probably different if you're juiced to the grills or have built up the volume over many years though) but it all depends on what your body responds to. The high volume approach doesn't work for you, and I don't think it would work for most people either. Anyway I wouldn't dwell on it bro it's just an unfortunate learning experience.
Thanks mate, the squat has dropped in numbers over the last year so it's hard to make many conclusions but one thing I've noticed is that the girls tend to do better, and historically females have been more successful with this coach. Weird, but again small sample size. There's only been a couple of other guys training and they are flaky at best.
I feel that I generally have escaped acute injuries because I have stayed on top of doing soft tissue work/voodoo banding/stretching every night and eat and sleep fine. Knock on wood as today my insertional achilles tendon is flaring up. But I haven't actually been 'hurt' since I did my foot nearly 2 years ago, maybe what you described is at play, hard to say.
Acole - glad to see you back. Thanks for the mention - what are you current goals and are you not gonna run with a team anymore? Also, what are those handicapped runs? I know there is one on grass thats like 120yds that Josh Ross won a few times where they handicap each person differently - pretty cool that they have them in Australia - is this a common thing?
Thanks mate, really cool to see you back dropping knowledge bombs everywhere again. Goals-wise I don't know. Since that last post I've joined the gym down the road and have just gone back to doing a few 'easy' sessions based on what I used to do. I still like the social aspect of being in a running squad, and I'll still compete in both the amateur and pro seasons again next year. But I'm definitely gonna do the off-season a little differently because physically and work-wise it's just hard to train 3-4 days during the week at 5PM over the meaty part of the year (March-Oct) and then lose half the weekend training as well. Especially if it's for a negative result.
Part of me just wants to drop running and just go back to the good old days: squat, do athletic exercises and try to dunk from SVJ at the gym court. That'd be pretty fun. I might do that from April to say August, then start getting ready to run from August-ish to November. Not really sure. Even though obviously big weight room numbers aren't the sole indicator of short sprint (60m-100m) times, I feel that for me with my shorter legs/body ratio, being strong in the squat/power clean is much more important for me than your average sprinter. It's just a shame the gym work this year has been mediocre. I think I just need to get the (explosive) strength levels back up again. I like this exchange from Rocky VI:
To beat this guy, you need speed.
You don't have it.
And your knees can't take the
pounding, so hard running is out.
And you got arthritis in your neck.
And you've got calcium deposits...
...on most of your joints,
so sparring is out.
I had that problem.
So what we'll be calling on is good
old-fashioned blunt-force trauma.
Horsepower. Heavy-duty,
cast-iron, pile-driving punches...
...that will have to hurt so much
they'll rattle his ancestors.
Every time you hit him with a shot...
...it's gotta feel like he tried kissing
the express train.
Yeah! Let's start building
some hurting bombs.
A bit out of context but I like the idea behind it. I'm not arthritic yet but I don't know how much more 'fit' I need to be as a short sprinter than what I achieved before the season and am still 90-95% of right now. I can complete any speed endurance session without giving up and run laps on laps. I will do it until I drop if that's the program and it works, but you have to be smart enough to adapt in the face of bad results. I just think sprinting in a straight line is fairly simple...the person with the best power/weight ratio with sufficient technique and body levers will win 99% of the time.
Still thinking about it though. There's a myotherapist/athletic trainer who used to train with us and is a boss (6'6'', 100kgs, sub-22 200m) and he has some really good ideas and approaches, and is big on developing explosive strength. Might train a bit more with him maybe. Given I will never be a 200m+ guy and am solely focusing on short sprints and power (i.e. vertical jump, broad jump, horizontal jumps), in terms of emphasis I think it should be something like [speed>strength>anaerobic endurance>>aerobic endurance]. Interested to hear yours and Mutumbo's thoughts being the other two sprint guys on the forum! And anyone else's of course. I can give more details if needed.
Yeah, handicap running has a big history here in Victoria (my state). The race you're talking about is the Stawell Gift, the major event of this otherwise nondescript town called Stawell in rural Vic. The main race is 120m actually, and Josh Ross won it off a ridiculous 7m mark the first time and then off scratch (0m) mark a couple of years later. But there are heaps of other races before that and also in other states, and there are some big guns who race. Here's the site:
www.val.org.auTheoretically 'everyone has a chance of winning' but it's kind of BS, the coach has told me some ridiculous stories about how corrupt it's been in terms of certain athletes from certain clubs/stables getting generous marks, shady stuff. But it is fun and it's miles better than the woeful amateur comp we have here.