Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - LBSS

Pages: 1 ... 596 597 [598] 599 600 ... 674
8956
Introduce Yourself / Re: for 45" running vert
« on: January 11, 2011, 02:49:47 pm »
He's 6', probably about 220. Not 100% sure of the weight but he's no more than an inch taller than me.

Anyway, the one time I saw him do it he was wearing jeans, working with a client. As she was leaving he just kind of wandered over to the bar, grabbed it and snatched it. Real casual, no fus. Blew my mind.

8957
Okie doke. You and the apparently dozens of researchers that love the 2D:4D theory might be right about all of this. I'm just saying, it's is all a bit too much like eugenicists or craniometrists trying to determine who's more or less likely to be a criminal, or more or less "intelligent," based on cranial cavity size or facial features. That was all exposed as a farce many decades ago.

So I'm inclined to be skeptical.

8958
Starting Strength plus jumping a lot before you lift.

8959
Olympic Weightlifting / Re: Eduardo Guadamud Training Video
« on: January 11, 2011, 09:57:40 am »
It's ridiculous how far the bar pops off his chest when he's resetting. I mean, I know that always happens a little bit but it looked like a foot there!

(Apologies for any incorrect lifting terminology.)

8960
Injury, Prehab, & Rehab talk for the brittlebros / Re: Right Hip Pain
« on: January 11, 2011, 09:37:24 am »
Not enough information...

8961
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Kingfish
« on: January 11, 2011, 09:30:47 am »
hahaha bosu ball man rules. you should try to make sure he gets a cameo in all your videos.

8962
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: C'est la merde
« on: January 10, 2011, 11:42:26 pm »
O LA LALALALALALA!

8963
BW = idk but I'm about to buy a scale
SORENESS =  glutes, hamstrings, traps
ACHES/INJURIES = none
FATIGUE = none
DIET = solid, bout to get more solid

s2: power
- RATING (7/10)

- warmup

- 10 yard dashes x 5: so sore...

- ME jumps (~5-7 x 2) - if feel very stale, 1-step lead ins: game going so subbed:
depth jumps 3x3
depth drops 3x3

- ME MR halftuck: 5 x 5: I am just not a reactive dude

- ME MR pogo: 3 x 5: these were better, actually

- SQUAT: 3x8: 195,195,195

- S1: dips @ 3 x AF: (+8) 15,15,15 PR -- add weight next time

- S1: pullups @ 3 x AF: 8,8,8 -- first two sets to 9 next time

- OPTIONAL: CORE (Y/N?): med ball throws x3
OH x20
side x10e

- STRETCH

Still trying to figure out the best way to fill in the form, so it's easiest to read.

8964
Nutrition & Supplementation / Re: Atkins advantage bars
« on: January 10, 2011, 10:14:04 pm »
Quote from: atkins bar
Warning: Excessive consumption may cause laxative effect.

Let us know when you get the shits, breh.

8965
Introduce Yourself / Re: 5.18 40 running future NFL star
« on: January 10, 2011, 10:10:58 pm »
German can be quite beautiful, actually, imho.

8966
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ARowe's Journal
« on: January 10, 2011, 05:41:51 pm »
what was up with your squats?

8967
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: THE DREAM JOURNAL
« on: January 10, 2011, 05:21:39 pm »
Sorry for wack formatting, originally recalled in a gchat conversation. Looking at it this way, kind of poetic:

i had a dream last night
i was picked up and driven to work, very late
for some reason i was confused and out of it
my mom was driving and i think lincoln and jack were also in the car
discombobulated is the right word, not really foggy or drugged or anything
and when i got to work, i realized i still just had sweat pants on
and i freaked out
tried to calculate whether it would be worse to go home and change and be even later
or to roll up to my desk in sweats
my mom was running late for wherever she was going, so she was in a rush
and trying to get me to hurry up and get out of the car
i was trying to figure out whether it would be worth trying to convince her to drive me back home
then i woke up

8968
Aaaaand boom goes the dynamite:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19553247
Nevertheless, here we demonstrate that the sexes do not greatly differ in the scaling between the 2nd and 4th digit. Sexual differences in 2D : 4D are mainly caused by the shift along the common allometric line with non-zero intercept, which means 2D : 4D necessarily decreases with increasing finger length, and the fact that men have longer fingers than women. We conclude that previously published results on the 2D : 4D ratio are biased by its covariation with finger length. We strongly recommend regression-based approaches for comparisons of hand shape among different groups.

8969
As any third-grader knows, IF UR A DUDE AND UR INDEX FINGER IS LONGER THEN UR GAYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

My guess is that the digit ratio theory is gonna be disproven, or at least fall out of favor, pretty soon. It just smells too much like craniometry to me. I snooped around a little bit just now and found that people have done studies correlating finger length with everything from competitive performance of female fencers to rates of schizophrenia. But they're just correlations, which are subject to all kind of biases and errors even in the most honest and diligent scientists. The best guess anyone has made as to why the correlations might be there is prenatal androgen exposure, leading to greater testosterone levels and sensitivity in later life, as Kellyb pointed out.

But doubt is already being cast on use of digit ratio as a marker of prenatal androgen levels, which is the supposed basis for its validity as a determinant of masculinization and therefore all kinds of physiological effects. And if there's not even a correlation there, the rest of the supposed effect kind of falls apart:

                                                           


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20862705

Dev Psychobiol. 2011 Jan;53(1):69-78.
No association between two candidate markers of prenatal sex hormones: digit ratios (2D:4D and other) and finger-ridge counts.

Dressler SG, Voracek M.

Department of Basic Psychological Research, School of Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, Vienna, Austria.
Abstract

The second-to-fourth digit ratio (2D:4D), putatively indexing prenatal androgen levels retrospectively, has become increasingly popular as an easily applied measure in research into the prenatal sex-hormonal bases of behavior, health, and disease. However, its validity has not yet been conclusively demonstrated and in fact is currently debated, because validation tests of 2D:4D with other, prenatally established, presumed markers for prenatal sex-hormone action have yielded mixed evidence or still are unavailable. Hence, the associations of 2D:4D with finger-ridge counts, one such further under-researched marker, were examined in this study. In a sample of 75 male and 75 female normal healthy adults, the six possible finger-length ratios of the human hand (from 2D:3D to 4D:5D, including the classic 2D:4D ratio) were ascertained with two commonly used measurement methods (imaged-based vs. fingers measured directly), along with two traditional dermatoglyphic traits (total and absolute finger-ridge counts). Sex differences in finger-length ratios (lower in men) generally were of moderate size (about .5 SD units), whereas those in finger-ridge counts (higher in men) were small to negligible (about .2 SD units). Within-sex analysis did not indicate theory compliant (i.e., negative) correlations between these two sets of traits that were consistent, noteworthy, or reliable. Finger-length ratios and finger-ridge counts are ontogenetically overlapping in their prenatal formation and anatomically adjacent. Hence, possible temporal and localized sex-hormonal effects in prenatal life are unlikely to account for their nonassociation. The current findings cast some doubt on the validity of these retrospective pointers to prenatal androgen levels.


                                                           


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19819951

Endocrinology. 2009 Nov;150(11):5119-24. Epub 2009 Oct 9.
Fingers as a marker of prenatal androgen exposure.

Berenbaum SA, Bryk KK, Nowak N, Quigley CA, Moffat S.

Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, 519 Moore, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA. sab31@psu.edu

Comment in:

    * Endocrinology. 2009 Nov;150(11):4819-22.

Abstract

Interest in biological substrates of sex-related variations in psychological and physiological characteristics has led to a search for biomarkers of prenatal hormone exposure that can be measured postnatally. There has been particular interest in digit ratio, the relative lengths of the second and fourth fingers (2D:4D), but its validity as a measure of prenatal androgen has not been established. We report the strongest evaluation of the value of 2D:4D as a biomarker for early androgen exposure. Individuals with 46,XY karyotype but no effective prenatal androgen exposure due to complete androgen insensitivity syndrome had digit ratios that were feminized: they were higher than those of typical men and similar to those of typical women. Nevertheless, the effect was modest in size, and there was considerable within-group variability and between-group overlap, indicating that digit ratio is not a good marker of individual differences in prenatal androgen exposure.

8970
yeah i forgot bout using 1 but it was just like not even half an inch, it was just for 1 set to see how the ankle would do, no full squat workout or anything. but it mainly felt like i was using my right leg anyway haha it was weird

Still, you're just so much more unstable if your foot isn't totally grounded. Asymmetry weird too, any thoughts as to why that might be?

Pages: 1 ... 596 597 [598] 599 600 ... 674