Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Raptor

Pages: 1 ... 58 59 [60] 61 62 ... 492
886
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: August 01, 2015, 08:30:43 pm »
I can, if my knees are straight. Once they start to approach a half-squat depth, getting the glutes to fired requires a tremendous amount of effort. Like, actively thinking about that happening like crazy. No wonder my half squat sucks.

On the other hand, the glute recruitment becomes better if I just push the hips back, like in a RDL. But once the knees bend (knees travel forward) as in a jump or half squat, the glutes are being turned off.

887
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: August 01, 2015, 06:56:56 pm »
I can't. I have no glute control while with both legs planted etc. It's complicated.

888
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: July 31, 2015, 04:44:10 pm »
It's really, really weird.

When I jump off two, for example for a jumpshot, I feel 100% quad. No glute no nothing. In fact, my two leg jump with a ball in hand looks and feels horrible, for a jumpshot. And when I land I feel like crashing. I basically just bend at the knees and jump, the hips don't do anything.

So how can I be quad dominant in a jump and yet suck at half squatting? Doesn't make any sense. Unless I have weak quads and even weaker posterior chain, so the CNS is like "well OK, let me choose a knee bend since the quads are a bit stronger".

But then shouldn't I be better at half squats, like high bar squats (although it's a serious flexiblity issue there that is limiting me) and suck at deadlifts?

Really weird.

889
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: July 31, 2015, 06:58:31 am »
It's so weird looking how much you smoke me on the half squats and how much you struggle with the hang cleans while also being able to do a proper catch on the shoulders. Very interesting.

I guess you have better quads/better structure for quad "expression" whereas I have better PC. I don't know.

890
Well I've done everything by the book. You tell me how the same ratio is maintained despite increases in bodyweight? Sounds like a genetic thing to me.

Remember, my "natural" VJ back when I was 15 was "wow I touched the net" level off one leg (12 inches) and I didn't know a two-leg jump was even possible. That's the genetics I was served up with.

891
Are you kidding me?

How about telling me how much I waste my time having pretty much the same ratio of squat/BW in the last 7 years or so, going religiously to the gym and putting as much if not MORE effort than anybody else I know.

No matter what I did, the squat/BW ratio stayed the same all this time. And pretty much everything else. Increase in bodyweight? See SOME increases in strength, but overall the same ratio.

Genetics is genetics, and you can't go around it.

892
Dem glucocorticoid levels...

893
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: July 29, 2015, 06:19:54 am »
I would probably have a ~100% collapse rate in my plants after that, or 12 inch jumps at the most.

894
Well of course it is. But it's depressing to think that stuff is more into the realm of genetics than it is in the realm of actual training effects. To get a training effect would mean, IMO, to do a tremendous amount of volume of plyometric work, a stuff that athletic/high jump coaches here in Romania do abide by.

Same thing with becoming a reactive "dunker" - go the Jordan Kilganon or Kadour Ziani "non stop dunking/dunk or die" route. But only those whose genetics were "right" to begin with will be able to go that route without getting injured, because someone with faulty mechanics/"bad structure" for jumping will take in so much damage from high volume jumping (using those bad mechanics combined with a bad structure) that they will get injured before any positive training effects will become noticeable.

It's really depressing when you think about it.

895
Reactive in my books is just a translation of "my quad tendons accept a tremendous amount of load without shutting down the quads in the process".

896
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: July 28, 2015, 04:33:38 pm »
Pace : ~5m / km

5 meters/kilometer?

 :trollface:

BTW... you do jumps after running one mile? Are you nuts?

897
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Scooby 2011 Journal
« on: July 28, 2015, 07:38:41 am »
I just don't get how a guy that is 6-7 years in vert training feels the need to post this ultra-base-level knowledge.

I do.

He posted it while he was standing upside down.

898
What is the programming language that vag wrote that stuff into? C? Cause it sure as heck ain't looking like Java.

900
Would having a boner affect the center of gravity hence increasing the leverage against the spine putting the spine at risk?

Something to think about.

Pages: 1 ... 58 59 [60] 61 62 ... 492