Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - LBSS

Pages: 1 ... 577 578 [579] 580 581 ... 668
8671
Program Review / Re: Charlie Francis Programs
« on: March 02, 2011, 09:45:10 am »
I hate you all. I still can't get into the forums. I think they're racist...

WTF, try again. Makes no sense.


8672
Introduce Yourself / Re: for 45" running vert
« on: March 02, 2011, 09:38:44 am »
Strong lifting. Your overhead strength is coming along fine it seems.

+1

8673
Nutrition & Supplementation / Re: N.O. Xplode
« on: March 01, 2011, 11:20:36 pm »
you loaded, breh? that shit is expensive!  :o

8674
Introduce Yourself / Re: Norwegian Girl
« on: March 01, 2011, 11:15:11 pm »
So you think she's a child? She seems "mature enough" to me. I don't think chronological age is THAT important. It's what's behind the carcass that's important. Whatever, getting into philosophy again.

8675
Thanks brosephines.

@Divad: soreness is no reason at all to change depth, IMO.

Andrew disagrees with me on this, but I think you should squat to the fullest extent allowed by your structure and mobility. If you're really tall or have shitty hip mobility, you shouldn't be going deep. But if you're normal sized then increasing ROM can only help over time.

:-*

 :highfive:

8676
BW = i keep forgetting to measure
SORENESS = none
ACHES/INJURIES = none
FATIGUE = very high
DIET = shite, not nearly enough food and what i got was not the best.

kept it nice and easy today because high stress at work, long hours, shit sleep and shit diet (today, yesterday was good) meant no energy or focus going in

-warm up

-jump rope x5 mins
mixing in double unders here and there

-squat 3 x 5
225,225,225 == NO HIP TWEAK
:D :ibsquatting:

-BSS 3 x 5
80,80,80 == NO HIP TWEAK  
:D :highfive:

-C1: push up x10
-C2: leg lower x10
-C3: pull up x4
-C4: MB OH throw x15
-info: 5 rounds

stretch

now time to redeem my diet a little bit.

8677
MOVIES & ENTERTAINMENT & SHeeT! / Re: THE WIRE
« on: March 01, 2011, 06:40:24 pm »
http://www.adarq.org/forum/movies-and-sheet/the-wire/

 ;)

word, sorry for duplicate thread. searched but didn't find that one.

8678
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: funny / horrible training videos
« on: March 01, 2011, 06:07:21 pm »
I bet there are plenty of good athletes in those places. They just didn't grow up doing jumping jacks every day in PE class. Plus most people I see doing pushups do them with atrocious form, so that's not exactly damning.

8679
Nutrition & Supplementation / Re: Best tasting Protein flavor
« on: March 01, 2011, 03:41:46 pm »
Got vanilla and that was a mistake....taste is too plain to kill of the horrid after taste of protein ish

strawberry was my weapon of choice till recently, I just got sick of the same stuff...am trying cookies now, it's allright about = to the strawberry

Oh, and don't use water for the ish..Idk why i was dumb enough to do water with the ish, but it was terrible and lowers protein from milk  :uhhhfacepalm:



i doubt i'll ever switch from vanilla. just mix it with chocolate milk. tastes AMAZING.

8680
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: March 01, 2011, 03:39:12 pm »
your pics are so amazing...just flying man... Lefty and 2 handers made and peak vert are OUTSTANDING!
freak...can't wait the video.

word. best still is two-hander with ball in net.

8681
MOVIES & ENTERTAINMENT & SHeeT! / THE WIRE
« on: March 01, 2011, 02:43:08 pm »
The single most staggeringly awesome thing I have ever seen. Just absolutely towers over every other TV show ever made. But not only that, it ranks up there with greatest works of art of my lifetime.

I can't remember who was saying The Sopranos is better, but whoever you are: No.

8682
I REP SILVER SPRING
















YES BORN AND RAISED IN MARYLAND*





















Wizards 2012 champs

























































U MAD?


































FUCK OHIO














*WELL, TECHNICALLY I WAS BORN IN DC

8683
yup. same size as karl malone, moves and jumps like derrick rose.

anyone who thinks they're even close as athletes is kidding themselves. it'd be like saying a defensive end who could cover randy moss on a deep post and then sky him for the INT wasn't the more impressive athlete.

8684
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: High cut calves
« on: March 01, 2011, 12:07:21 pm »
Wow I just HOPE my son is really into basketball, I'll turn him into a damn star. I mean with the knowledge that I know now, imaging applying it to an 8 year old in stead of an 18 year old, and the potential rises just so much more. And how knows how much more knowledge we'll all have by the time we have kids? Better protein, better training philosophies, etc.

I mean I'll have him play with toy basketballs when he's a baby and stuff and watch basketball games with him, hoping that he'll have an interest for it, but I don't think I should force it down his throat if he doesn't like it. Like if he falls in love with soccer, then I'll help him like crazy with whatever I know about it.

yup. daughter, too, if i have a daughter. and if the kids don't turn out to be into sports at all, well, that's cool, too. but i'll be damned if they run, throw and jump like idiots.

8685
Program Review / Re: Charlie Francis Programs
« on: March 01, 2011, 10:30:15 am »
Didn't want to start a new thread, but adarq.org's getting some more love on CF's forum. Too bad it's from one of the dumb poster on there that's always getting shat on, though. :P

http://www.charliefrancis.com/community/showpost.php?p=246175&postcount=102

Jeez, that guys on youtube running 10.22 too.

I wander what the knowledgeable guys are running?.




link? 10.22 is fast as shit.  :o

if you're trying to imply that being an elite athlete (and 10.22 qualifies in anyone's book) correlates with not asking retarded questions or making retarded claims, good luck with that. a taste:

Quote from: Race Radio
Backed up by electromyography, I find squats to be the most overrated exercise around. Even though Charlie stated 'sprinting was a back dominant sport', he still employed/favoured squats highly, which from my research are quad dominant (right? or wrong?), both front or regular & don't hit much glute neither. Wouldn't deadlifts/barbell hip thrusts/reverse hypers etc (ham/hip dominant) be favoured options?.

Anyway a bench/squat variation?. What does everyone make of these below, (opinions) please?. You don't see many people performing this any more. A forgotten strongman's exercise, great for overall body strength development.




I think there right up there IMO, anyone into really strengthening the core in particular, increasing your plank time etc should be hitting on these. According to electromyography, great for glutes, hams, delts etc.

Yes? or No?. Performed dynamically or isometrically?. All opinions appreciated.

Pages: 1 ... 577 578 [579] 580 581 ... 668