Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - LBSS

Pages: 1 ... 552 553 [554] 555 556 ... 669
8296
long-term steady-state training and technique training are nothing like strength training. it's very, very different to swim every day or to make 1000 jumpers than to work up to a daily max squat.

if you want to get fast, do you think you should sprint ME every day? i mean, i defer to adarq and lance on this because they know 80 billion times more than i do, but that shit doesn't make sense.

8297
and, if i could just add, beginners will have a hard time with that because beginners' (and many intermediates', i'm certainly included in this) form is unstable at best and shitty at worst.

working up to a max can be dangerous, i see nasty-looking shit all the time with people at my gym, even trying for heavy sets of five or whatever.

not disagreeing with lance, just saying, don't be stupid and know your limits before you try to push them.

8298
can't argue with the results. also can't argue with high-quality one-on-one coaching, selecting cream-of-the-crop athletes and perfecting technique before embarking on anything that intense.

8300
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: July 18, 2011, 09:48:43 am »
what's your caloric estimate and macro breakdown for that cold shower?  :P

8301
sample size small as shit so just food for thought. the university responsible can go fuck itself. i'd actually be curious to see this one. if anyone has journal access, please pm me:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21266733

Quote
Increasing squat depth corresponded to a decrease in PF and an increase in JH, relative VI for both SJS and CMJJS during all loads. Across all squat depths and loading conditions relative VI was statistically significantly correlated to JH in the SJS (r = .8956, P < .0001, power = 1.000) and CMJJS (r = .6007, P < .0001, power = 1.000). Across all squat depths and loading conditions PF was statistically nonsignificantly correlated to JH in the SJS (r = -0.1010, P = .2095, power = 0.2401) and CMJJS (r = -0.0594, P = .4527, power = 0.1131). Across all squat depths and loading conditions peak power (PP) was significantly correlated with JH during both the SJS (r = .6605, P < .0001, power = 1.000) and the CMJJS (r = .6631, P < .0001, power = 1.000). PP was statistically significantly higher at BM in comparison with 20% of 1RM and 40% of 1RM in the SJS and CMJJS across all squat depths.
CONCLUSIONS:

Results indicate that relative VI and PP can be used to predict JS performance, regardless of squat depth and loading condition. However, relative VI may be the best predictor of JS performance with PF being the worst predictor of JS performance.

also, this.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17127594

Quote
J Sports Sci. 2007 Jan 15;25(2):193-200.
The influence of squat depth on maximal vertical jump performance.
Domire ZJ, Challis JH.
Source

University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA. zdomire@uwyo.edu
Abstract

An increase in the period over which a muscle generates force can lead to the generation of greater force and, therefore, for example in jumping, to greater jump height. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of squat depth on maximum vertical jump performance. We hypothesized that jump height would increase with increasing depth of squat due to the greater time available for the generation of muscular force. Ten participants performed jumps from preferred and deep squat positions. A computer model simulated jumps from the different starting postures. The participants showed no difference in jump height in jumps from deep and preferred positions. Simulated jumps produced similar kinematics to the participants' jumps. The optimal squat depth for the simulated jumps was the lowest position the model was able to jump from. Because jumping from a deep squat is rarely practised, it is unlikely that these jumps were optimally coordinated by the participants. Differences in experimental vertical ground reaction force patterns also suggest that jumps from a deep squat are not optimally coordinated. These results suggest there is the potential for athletes to increase jump performance by exploiting a greater range of motion.

8302
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Kingfish
« on: July 16, 2011, 06:44:52 pm »
somewhere i have seen a study that found SVJ and CMJ were higher the deeper subjects went, even with loads. bah, can't find it right now, will try to dig it up...

8303

ADD THIS NOTE TO EVERY POST SO YOU KEEP REMEMBERING: JUMP EVERY WORKOUT. IF THERE'S NO SPACE, FIND SPACE.

FOAM ROLL BEFORE EVERY WORKOUT, LACROSSE/TENNIS BALL SMR AFTER EVERY WORKOUT.

STANDING QUAD/HAM/CALF/ITB/PEC STRETCHING THROUGHOUT THE DAY, EVERY HOUR OR SO.

KEEP SWEETS TO A MINIMUM. MOAR PROTEIN. MOAR VEGGIES.


BW = 166.0 FFFFFUUU but the eyeball test is getting a little better. more abs. gotta keep protein up and cals, too, esp on workout days.
SORENESS = none
ACHES/INJURIES = none
FATIGUE = low

- yoga x 75 minutes
went with my gf. felt great, sweated a bunch, opened up hips and chest a bunch. it had been probably a year and a half or maybe even two years since i did a yoga class.

walked to the gym, then

- warm up

- depth drop 2 x 5

- depth jump x 3,5,5
mostly pretty low

- squat 5 x 270
good not great, need to focus on eccentric a little better.

- OHP 3 x 5 x 105

- BOR 3 x 5 x 105

such a beautiful day. smolov starts for real on tuesday. will probably get some kind of light exercise tomorrow and maybe some jumping if i feel like it. and then, the pain. i can't wait.

8304
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: July 15, 2011, 02:46:04 pm »
fuck ohio state.

8305
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: Weird Poliquin article
« on: July 15, 2011, 09:33:09 am »
i've said it before and i'll say it again, there's a reason they call him loliquin.

8306

ADD THIS NOTE TO EVERY POST SO YOU KEEP REMEMBERING: JUMP EVERY WORKOUT. IF THERE'S NO SPACE, FIND SPACE.

FOAM ROLL BEFORE EVERY WORKOUT, LACROSSE/TENNIS BALL SMR AFTER EVERY WORKOUT.

STANDING QUAD/HAM/CALF/ITB/PEC STRETCHING THROUGHOUT THE DAY, EVERY HOUR OR SO.

KEEP SWEETS TO A MINIMUM. MOAR PROTEIN. MOAR VEGGIES.


BW = 166.5
SORENESS = none
ACHES/INJURIES = toes bugging, especially left one
FATIGUE = low to moderate

- warm up

- sprints

- depth jumps 2 x 5
not very good, no stiffness

- broad jump x a few
8'10.5" longest, pretty bad

- squat 3 x 275

- SS1: chin up x 9
- SS1: dip x 9 + 23
- SS1 info: 3 rounds, adding a rep next time

- core
GHR sit up x 15
ab wheel roll outs 2 x 15-20, dead stop at bottom of a few of the reps

- stretch

8307
Futbol (soccer) / Re: USA.. USA... USA!!!
« on: July 13, 2011, 02:11:59 pm »
ALLEZ!

oh wait, shit.

GO!

8308
When you log jumps as shity , what do you mean? absolutely or relatively? And what are your thresholds?
I judge mine relatively and consider them shity when they are 1'' or more below what i expected from that session.
e.g. yesterday i was getting 30-31 , which is awful as absolute number , but relatively ( considering injuries , fatigue , stim etc ) it was good , was expecting 29-30.
Curious how you rate/evaluate yours...

good question. i pretty much mean that they were lower than what i expect should be my minimum at this point, which is 30.5-31 -- basically i feel like i should always be able to touch rim easily. when jumps are below that level i'm disappointed. when they're that level or above, i feel okay about them. i got there a few times last night but at least a few of the jumps were in the 29" range. midway through the session i realized i was having nice smooth slow starts that never got fast (lol). had a few slightly-less-shitty jumps after that, ~30".

usually it also means that the jumps just "felt" slow or unexplosive or both.

 

8309
good pistol tutorial by jimmy bathurst, including a way to get around the rear-leg-assisting-on-step-ups problem. http://beastskills.com/tutorials/tutorials/38

8310
last night. i guess work stress and lack of sleep builds up. i slept well the night before last so i guess monday was still catching up with me.

EDIT: also, haha flander. that guy probably isn't even THAT obese for parts of this country, though. like he's probably not the fattest person he knows.


ADD THIS NOTE TO EVERY POST SO YOU KEEP REMEMBERING: JUMP EVERY WORKOUT. IF THERE'S NO SPACE, FIND SPACE.

FOAM ROLL BEFORE EVERY WORKOUT, LACROSSE/TENNIS BALL SMR AFTER EVERY WORKOUT.

STANDING QUAD/HAM/CALF/ITB/PEC STRETCHING THROUGHOUT THE DAY, EVERY HOUR OR SO.

KEEP SWEETS TO A MINIMUM. MOAR PROTEIN. MOAR VEGGIES.


BW = ???
SORENESS = calves
ACHES/INJURIES = none
FATIGUE = moderate

- warm up

- sprints x 10y
2 @ 60%
4 @ 90%

- DSVJ x a bunch submax

- DLRVJ x 10-12
truly shitty, got a couple that weren't quite as bad toward the end but oh my goodness. :uhhhfacepalm:

- pogos submax 3 x 20

- squat 2 x 2 x 270
some of the warm ups i did as jump squats. main sets felt surprisingly weak.

- OHP 3 x 5 x 95
extremely easy

- BOR 2 x 5 x 95, 10 x 95
full pause at the top

- stretch


Pages: 1 ... 552 553 [554] 555 556 ... 669