6736
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Jump Training Multiple Times a day
« on: December 24, 2010, 04:00:11 pm »
What exactly did you do? And how did you discovered that you have ankle/feet issues?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
6737
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: The training equipment thread, PRICES, questions, equipment links etc
« on: December 24, 2010, 03:45:24 pm »6738
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Jump Training Multiple Times a day
« on: December 24, 2010, 02:09:18 pm »
That makes me remember something:
When I was jumping very high with very little strength, that always occured after a GREAT warmup and never without a warmup. My vert was so low with warming up (lower than now). But the thing was - I was also doing STATIC stretching before my jumps. You know, just because our sports teacher forced us to...
But what if that's actually beneficial? I mean, I know it's going to temporarily make you weaker, but I was jumping great like 20 minutes after that occured (and also being warmed up greatly).
When I was jumping very high with very little strength, that always occured after a GREAT warmup and never without a warmup. My vert was so low with warming up (lower than now). But the thing was - I was also doing STATIC stretching before my jumps. You know, just because our sports teacher forced us to...
But what if that's actually beneficial? I mean, I know it's going to temporarily make you weaker, but I was jumping great like 20 minutes after that occured (and also being warmed up greatly).
6739
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: power clean video snapshot
« on: December 24, 2010, 02:06:08 pm »
I seriously think Dizal Wizal is a hero... I mean, even with horrid ahem... I mean perfect form, he didn't yet get injured to my knowledge at least. That's beast (no sarcasm).
6740
Introduce Yourself / Re: Hello there!
« on: December 24, 2010, 06:50:00 am »
Well good luck, but for a 45+ you'll need to train 5 years or more I suppose without having major injury difficulties, with great nutrition and great training...
6741
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: vag's journal : Age vs Vertical
« on: December 24, 2010, 06:40:54 am »
Actually, I just found this:
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LhJL5bUOrY" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LhJL5bUOrY</a>
It does seem pretty high, don't know how much but decent.
This one as well...
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ykADt4v1jA" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ykADt4v1jA</a>
If you could come at my speed (that's slow already) I think you'd go much higher. And I'm not even an efficient jumper.
It does seem pretty high, don't know how much but decent.
This one as well...
If you could come at my speed (that's slow already) I think you'd go much higher. And I'm not even an efficient jumper.
6742
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: December 24, 2010, 06:39:06 am »
That's what he said about people that try to feel the "burn".
Quote
20 reps makes me feel great too, so much blood flow
6743
Program Review / Re: Jump Manual
« on: December 24, 2010, 06:33:58 am »
So what... you keep a big knife on your property so that someone doesn't jump the fence to steal the camera or what?
6744
ADARQ & LanceSTS - Q&A / Depth jump "introspection"
« on: December 24, 2010, 05:11:35 am »
I've talked about this theory of mine some time ago on TVS, but here it is again:
Box height / VJ (cm):
30 / 60
40 / 70
50 / 75
60 / 72
If we're to listen to the "general consensus", the optimal box height for this athlete is 50 cm, since off that box he gets the highest subsequent VJ (75 cm). But in my opinion, maybe he should use the 60 cm box where the inhibition starts to take place, that being the 60 cm box since the subsequent VJ is 72 cm there (-3 cm).
That should teach this athlete that it's OK to load more eccentrically so adaptations occur.
What do you guys think?
PS. I think this could work but it might be even more injury prone than a regular depth jumps since probably the landing mechanics are compromised, and this kind of destroys my concept.
Box height / VJ (cm):
30 / 60
40 / 70
50 / 75
60 / 72
If we're to listen to the "general consensus", the optimal box height for this athlete is 50 cm, since off that box he gets the highest subsequent VJ (75 cm). But in my opinion, maybe he should use the 60 cm box where the inhibition starts to take place, that being the 60 cm box since the subsequent VJ is 72 cm there (-3 cm).
That should teach this athlete that it's OK to load more eccentrically so adaptations occur.
What do you guys think?
PS. I think this could work but it might be even more injury prone than a regular depth jumps since probably the landing mechanics are compromised, and this kind of destroys my concept.
6745
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: December 24, 2010, 05:01:13 am »
Wanna feel the burn?
Light a match!
Or so did Hafield say about high rep stuff.
Light a match!
Or so did Hafield say about high rep stuff.
6746
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: vag's journal : Age vs Vertical
« on: December 24, 2010, 04:59:59 am »That's still higher than me, and I'm 10 years younger and squat more.
Gotta mean something. Either bad for me or good for vag, or both.
2 questions:
1) How do i jump higher when my PR is 34,5'' , this season best is 33,5'' and you jumped 36'' a few weeks ago?
2) How do you squat more when you did PRed at 140x1 last week and i PRed at 3x1x145 ?
But lets just say that our numbers are very good for both!
1) I meant off two feet. My PR jump off two feet with runup and everything is 31-32 inches. Off one leg, that's another story.
2) You did? That's great. I'm probably at that level as well if I go balls to the wall. But you still jump more even with that.
6747
Article & Video Discussion / Re: The Truth About Milk. Good or Bad?
« on: December 23, 2010, 02:15:10 pm »
I think it's OK to drink milk from cows, not sure about bulls though.
6748
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: vag's journal : Age vs Vertical
« on: December 23, 2010, 02:11:55 pm »
That's still higher than me, and I'm 10 years younger and squat more.
Gotta mean something. Either bad for me or good for vag, or both.
Gotta mean something. Either bad for me or good for vag, or both.
6749
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: power clean video snapshot
« on: December 23, 2010, 08:13:49 am »
That's not lovely.
That's Olivia O'Lovely.
That's Olivia O'Lovely.
6750
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: December 23, 2010, 08:05:25 am »
What's the thing with 20 rep sets? I mean, I know that's for added volume and stuff, but why 20 reps?