Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - T0ddday

Pages: 1 ... 43 44 [45] 46 47 ... 58
661
Track & Field / Re: Romanian 60m record holder
« on: March 25, 2013, 08:44:05 am »
Sprinters (especially in europe) almost give honest bodyweights.  Yohan Blake is listed at 160lbs.  Lol.  I think the fear giving non-sprinter type bodyweights will make the public think of drug use.  You really believe that Harry AA is both taller and lighter than Walter Dix? 


662
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: chasing athleticism
« on: March 25, 2013, 07:45:37 am »
more supplemental work for back? i know KF has made great use of rows and hypers.

Thanks. Perhaps in the future. I've added it to the TODONE list. I think I can get to my current goals without any extra non-squat assistance. But from there, say FS-5x115 will need to work on my upper back strength specially on that last rep. What I might do is add an extra rep on my backoff set. I usually do fives for those, might make those 6s. Might that work?

I'd caution against thinking like this.  There are two reasons why your upper back strength is limiting you. 

1) Holding heavy weight across the shoulder is causing your upper back to fatigue which causes your bar position to shift during multiple reps making the stress even worse.  This is often the problem when you are doing more than 3-4 reps.   

2) You are grinding a bit due to weak/fatigue quads and your instinct is to shift more weight to your hamstrings/glutes/low back and good-morning a bit... Of course you can't do this in a front-squat without dumping the bar so your upper-back has to dynamically fight the rest of your body to pull you back upright. 

####

In either case I would recommend against adding assistance work specific for front squats.  Remember, your goal is to jump high.  If its case (1):  Would upper-back work get you an extra rep or few lbs on your front squat... Maybe.   But you aren't trying to break the front squat world record, you are trying to become a better athlete.   For all the advantages front squats have for training athletes.... The big disadvantage is that the fatigue is almost unmanageable at higher rep ranges.   If you want to do higher reps, this is what back squat is for.   You just became an expert high-bar back squatter, now you can call on this ability to for your higher-rep back off work.   And yes, back squatting may require some assistance work down the road... and it might be unavoidable, but it will at least hurt your ability to get your legs stronger LESS than it will in the front squat.   

If it's case (2), then just let yourself get pinned if your upper-back forces you to with heavy weight.  When you do grind and feel upper-back activation though.... Keep your legs firing, cue the legs to fix the problem not the other way around.   Notice how when I do a high intensity front squat my back gets activated/bar slips forward and bar speed suffers.... However, I complete the rep not by having a strong back (my upper back is not very strong) but by keep my legs firing and standing up.   Keep your training simple.  It's working really well.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqCrz52UeBY" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqCrz52UeBY</a>

Appreciate the detailed logical analysis brother. I'll try to discover which of 1 or 2 it may be. I go thru the first 3 reps without any problem, it doesn't seem heavy or challenging. The 4th one is hard enough but it looks easy on video. By the 5th rep i'm conscious of this being the last one - so I take a few breaths trying to get mentally prepared to bust out the effort. At this point i'm feeling the fatigue. I want to rack the weight but I also want the PR. I push forward. While resting before the 5th rep, I'm aware that standing there with a barbell on my shoulders is fatiguing me further so I can't wait too long. I need to stay tight but my body isn't willing to expend that effort because it's saving it for the final grind out of the hole. I go down into the hole and come up quick, and then, at around 1/4 squat position im at a dead stop, my back has rounded and I ride the bar down to the pins. I have to remind myself then that I should have anticipated my upper back rounding and worked harder to stay upright but it never occured to me during the actual rep because I was so focused on just completing the rep.

I agree with you that instead of GM it up, it's better to fail the rep. Or at least try to finish it by pushing thru the legs. That's good sense. I don't make a habit of GM my front squats, I consciously keep form honest throughout the set.

Why I have been doing 5s. I like the idea of doing 2 heavy sets of 5 and getting my volume in quickly. I did a lot of triples initially but those things are a bitch mentally, especially when I squat 3x a week and doing heavy triples frequently just kinda sucks. It's fun once in a while, i dont mind doing a set or two once a month. But 5s just seem better, they're brutally hard, they carry over to 3s and they give a great workout. I like the challenge and the economy in total sets they provide. Having said that, you've made a good case for doing higher reps with backsquat and lower reps with front squat. I think when i've got my FS fives to somewhere decent say 125kg - i'll maintain that, and then do more triples and doubles while doing the higher reps with backsquat. That's the other thing. I fail frontsquats a lot more gracefully than backsquats. Backsquat failure is kind of sudden, abrupt and precarious - i've learnt now to ride the bar down anticipating failure rather than actually failing though. Whereas with front squats I can technically fail and still safely ride the bar down without any risk of injury.

Also your video is private!

Fixed the link.  Watched your vid, can't tell for sure by the angle but looks like the knees coming together before failure as well.  I'd fix that before I'd work on upper back.  Band walks.  On the last rep when you back rounds a bit you can grind it if you press harder and press back a bit more through the heels.  Although, if you are squatting 3x times a week, I wouldn't go for the grind reps anyway.

663
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: chasing athleticism
« on: March 23, 2013, 02:08:52 pm »
more supplemental work for back? i know KF has made great use of rows and hypers.

Thanks. Perhaps in the future. I've added it to the TODONE list. I think I can get to my current goals without any extra non-squat assistance. But from there, say FS-5x115 will need to work on my upper back strength specially on that last rep. What I might do is add an extra rep on my backoff set. I usually do fives for those, might make those 6s. Might that work?

I'd caution against thinking like this.  There are two reasons why your upper back strength is limiting you. 

1) Holding heavy weight across the shoulder is causing your upper back to fatigue which causes your bar position to shift during multiple reps making the stress even worse.  This is often the problem when you are doing more than 3-4 reps.   

2) You are grinding a bit due to weak/fatigue quads and your instinct is to shift more weight to your hamstrings/glutes/low back and good-morning a bit... Of course you can't do this in a front-squat without dumping the bar so your upper-back has to dynamically fight the rest of your body to pull you back upright. 

####

In either case I would recommend against adding assistance work specific for front squats.  Remember, your goal is to jump high.  If its case (1):  Would upper-back work get you an extra rep or few lbs on your front squat... Maybe.   But you aren't trying to break the front squat world record, you are trying to become a better athlete.   For all the advantages front squats have for training athletes.... The big disadvantage is that the fatigue is almost unmanageable at higher rep ranges.   If you want to do higher reps, this is what back squat is for.   You just became an expert high-bar back squatter, now you can call on this ability to for your higher-rep back off work.   And yes, back squatting may require some assistance work down the road... and it might be unavoidable, but it will at least hurt your ability to get your legs stronger LESS than it will in the front squat.   

If it's case (2), then just let yourself get pinned if your upper-back forces you to with heavy weight.  When you do grind and feel upper-back activation though.... Keep your legs firing, cue the legs to fix the problem not the other way around.   Notice how when I do a high intensity front squat my back gets activated/bar slips forward and bar speed suffers.... However, I complete the rep not by having a strong back (my upper back is not very strong) but by keep my legs firing and standing up.   Keep your training simple.  It's working really well.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqCrz52UeBY" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqCrz52UeBY</a>




664

Thanks man, interesting observations. I'd love to see a study on femur/tibia lengths, height and SVJ in trained individuals and see if there's any correlation.

The study has been done in recreational athletes.  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16503672

Only foot length had any correlation to vertical jump.   I don't think you are going to find a significant difference in trained athletes as far as tib/femur and SVJ goes.   In general the advantages somewhat balance out.  Lankier longer femur guys will have an obvious leverage advantage IF they have equal strength levels through the range of motion... which they usually don't because they have to do a lot more work.   

665




Added the video back to my earlier post, please have a look. I don't ATG on backsquat, not militant about depth on backsquat as long as it's below parallel i'm happy. I save my deep squatting for the front squat which comes  naturally to me. I do use oly shoes, and I think i have the ankle mobility because I can front squat deep fine.

But having said that I might still have a problem with mobility all the same because my backsquat looks very assymetric, i favour my strong left side a lot. I just don't know what, or how to fix it.


Need a side view.  Deep Front squat doesn't require as much ankle mobility, so that doesn't mean much.   The fact that you hit depth by bowing your knees out rather than breaking forward at your knee suggests you lack a bit of mobility, but without a side view it's really hard to tell.  Also, you squat just looks bad, just looks like you aren't very good at it.  I bet if you squat a few times a week for a couple months your back squat will shoot right past your front squat. 

666
Training
FS 5x105 (PR), 5x100
BS 2x6x102, 4x6x80
OHP 2x5x55, 5x50, 8x45

FS notes:
Finally got the 105 fiver!! I wasn't up to it mentally today but somehow it happened. I'll take it. Hungry for more PRs this week. Bring it on.

BS notes:
Just re-realising why I abandoned backsquat. I'm the worlds worst backsquatter :(  I feel an incredible amount of torque on my lower back (spine) on the backsquat. I simply don't have that in front squats. The other thing is, most people say good squatter can front squat 90% of their olympic backsquat. Here I am struggling with backsquatting a weight LIGHTER than my front squat. WTF. I'm just not build for this lift. I give up. I don't get how other ppl can work their way easily to squatting 3 plates and some while i'm struggling around 2. I feel as though I should at least work up to 2x6x115 but how??

OHP notes:
Going to try devoting more attention to overhead press. Chasing a big bench didn't work, i'm a better overhead presser than bench presser, let me give ohp a chance now.

Post a video back squat video from the side.  I imagine you lack a bit of ankle flexibility (or don't own good oly shoes) but are religious about hitting good depth which causes you to round your low back hard to keep from falling backwards on your backsquat.   WIth the bar in front you can hit that really deep without rounding your back.   Try this test:

Squat down in front of a mirror but let yourself go on your tiptoes (think of a catcher in baseball).  Look at your back in the mirror and notice that it is perfectly perfectly straight up and down.   Now try and get your heels on the ground while maintaining the same back angle but shooting your knees farther past your toes.  If you cant get your shin angles appropriate to allow this you can do two things.

1) Get some decent olympic shoes, they will help a lot already.
2) Stop squatting artificially deep.  Build up to it.  Unrack the weight with the bar on your back and slowly descend by breaking at this hips/knees simultaneously  and letting your knees go forward to keep your back one solid unit.  Don't release tension, don't go so low your back rounds out.  Slowly get into this position where you maintain tension and you will feel your shins "stretching" and your weight on the ball of your foot.  Pause for a few seconds and explode up.  Continuing doing pause squats where you are congizant of your knee angles and your straight back... your ankle flexibility WILL improve and you will be able to hit more and more depth without sacrificing your tightness. 

Also, get some oly shoes.   I commend you for squatting ATG, but you can't combine your method with standard PL squatting advice (knees behind toes, break at hips, keep weight on the heels).   You are training a squat for which has a lot of athletic bang for the buck.  But it's not orthodox, the weight is on the ball of the foot and your knees should travel far past your toes.   Like front-squatting, this isn't the most efficient way to move big weight... but you will jump higher if you keep at it.



667

Were you somewhat fit/active prior to 2011?  Because to have an 29" SVJ at march 2011, is quite incredible, and i'm guessing that prior to 2011 you had some decent strength.

It's not that incredible I think. Athletically I've always been "above average", not elite but competitive, and also played ball a lot around 15-16y.o....I think you'd find most people in that category would have acceptable SVJs without much specific training for it.


Not incredible but not half bad either.  At Vert gym I was able to test some graduating high school kids; they were decent track athletes (the best were low 11 100m, ~38 300m hurdles), football players, but none were extensively weight trained.   What was surprising was how divided the jumping was by height.  None of the taller kids (6''2 + ) jumped higher than 26 inches, none of the kids over 6 feet went over 28, and a couple of the shorter guys got into the low 30's.   RVJ they all went much higher and the division on height was much less.   Anyhow, a fit athletic kid jumping 30 inches suggests pretty good potential. 

668

- squat 335 x 1; 345 x 1; 275 x 4,4
holy crap. i had 355 for sure, which would have been a PR tie. 345 went up fast. decided not to push it, though. no point in grinding. warmed up with HB until 135.

Just a few sessions of high-bar squatting and your already PRing in the low-bar.  Carryover!

669
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Kingfush
« on: February 21, 2013, 08:55:11 am »


* smith machine squats feeling less awkward. did multiple chins to look decent in pics. calfs looking strong. will workout again later to get appetite going so i can eat more fish/meat on the buffets. these all-inclusive deals are awesome. staying here in le blanc spa resort. will get some relaxing massage later. drank so much water because of all the sun exposure. was able to get a wet BW198lb.. lol. woke up after a long sleep to 192-194s again.


What was the price for the resort?  Recommended?  We have a ton of elevate miles and I been thinking about using them up on Cancun.

670
I've gained 8
I mean 8 lb's in 1 week is a nasty gain.

I've gained twice than that in one meal.

671
^^warmup is a great way to learn new tricks.   When I was a bit more mobile I was successfully completing triples up to 135,225,315,405 with pistols, overhead squats, front squats, back squats.   Probably the best maintenance workout ever.

672
^Agreed, also remember in general my advice is to switch up the way your are squatting.  You have added a bunch of weight to your LBS without VJ carryover (not uncommon) so now try something else.   Olympic squats.  If the bar is that painful on your traps you might have to try front squatting.   You can also invest in one of those blue manta ray things.   We are trying to switch up what you are doing with your legs... don't let trap pain get in the way of that. 

Interesting though that the pain is so severe, maybe some kind of muscle impingement going on?  Or nerve damage?

673

I don't think anyone even specified whether LBBS or HBBS is more specific to SVJ or RVJ. LBSS is primarily interested in his LR DLRVJ, where hips are more important than in an SVJ. Right?


This is a great point.  The tremendous carryover from the olympic squat seems much better for SVJ.  Now, SVJ and DLRJ are related obviously, and SVJ will help RVJ to some degree.... but in my case building up my squat served mostly to bring my SVJ up really close to my RVJ.   Of course, my RVJ was already decent... the results are surely different for people with low SVJ and DLRJ. 

However, I don't agree with the conclusion that RVJ is not aided as much by olympic squatting, low-bar squatting is preferred to bring up DLRJ because it's more hip "dominant".    Just because olympic squats are not super specific to an exercise doesn't mean LBS are the answer!    I feel that this is the same line of logic that causes strength coaches to think sprinters have to low-bar squat....  OS and LBS are not related to the degree that if one doesn't work the other always does!

Like Avishek said... We don't have studies and they are not even feasible.  Best thing we can really on is our experience.  Mine isn't as extensive as Glenn Pendley but it involves sprinters rather than primarily lifters like Pendleys.  I'd also like to hear Lance chime in here as I think he works primarily with basketball players, which are often a different breed being extremely tall and using having pretty big strength deficits.   

My experiences:

1) When you weak you have to get strong.   At this level everything works.  When someone like the poster selfallih PM's me asking what squat is best, I tell him to squat however he feels comfortable providing he gets good depth.  Low-Bar, High-Bar, Front-Squat, Box-squat.... it really doesn't matter.  If squat racks aren't available he can even deadlift.  Doesn't matter.    When you squat 50kg all of these squats will bring up your hamstrings, quads, glutes, hips, etc, and this added strength will make you a better athlete.     

2) As you get stronger everything works a little less.  However, olympic squatting seems to provide the best carryover for the longest ( it's like the Jensen's inequality of squats -> If you get that you know your real analysis!! ) and specifically it provides the best carryover for most of the other strength movements.   You could make an argument that carryover is even greater to athleticism and other movements with a huge full clean and jerk, but this lift is technically way more difficult and is basically a combination of multiple lifts.   This carryover for oly squatting "lasts longer" for the "SVJ" than for the "RVJ".   

@Raptor:

As far as the idea that you can get the same carryover from an olympic squat by "using more legs" in a LBS, here is what I don't get.  Olympic squats hurt your knee.  But if you put the bar on a different part of your back and emulate an olympic squat... your knees don't hurt.  So you must be doing something different with your legs (because knee pain is not caused by where on your back the bar is) and might therefore have less carryover than you would get if you used a traditional oly squat.    Remember, I believe that we don't really know 100% why olympic squatting has much better carryover.... it could simply be that full olympic squatting improves ankle mobility while strengthening the legs...    Also, don't look at this as an either or type of thing... If I had an athlete who was already fairly strong but for some reason couldn't do olympic squats, I wouldn't necessarily think 'low-bar squats".   

This might sound sacrilegious but I have actually seen better results for athletes who build up strength using above-parallel hi-bar type squats than athletes who use deep low-bar squats.   There are more tools in the shed than olympic and LB squats.... In fact if you give me an athlete who can do a huge above parallel hi-bar squat with good speed... I would put my money on a higher RVJ than the athlete who has added weight to his deep low-bar squat...   







674
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: chasing athleticism
« on: February 15, 2013, 12:20:02 pm »
kyle's main audience is people whose primary concern is aesthetics.

Don't know who Kyle is but IMO people who train primarily for aesthetics rather than performance end up looking like the train only for aesthetics.  Which to me is a rather unaesthetic look.   

675
I think that this thread is getting a bit carried away in so far as the analysis.  I think in general this branding of each person as quad dominant or hamstring dominant is a bit out of hand. 



Here is a sprinter (albiet one of the most muscular of sprinters).  He's not faster than you because of his superior posterior chain.  He's not hamstring dominant nor quad dominant necessarily.  Every part of his legs are stronger than yours and he's much more powerful and can run faster and jump much higher than most people.  The goal is to get strong strong strong.  Ideally you want to have a huge low-bar squat, huge high-bar squat, huge deadlift, huge front-squat, huge olympic lifts, be lean and train for jumping and running.   In other words you are want to be a beast in the weight-room and hope it translates to the field/court/track whatever.

There are three big misconceptions about the low bar squat, besides that I don't have a problem with an athlete low-bar squatting.  They are

a) That it more closely mimics the pull position and thus is a must for olympic lifters (rippetoe's claim - has been shot down by the every other olympic lifter).
b) The low-bar squat is better simply because (some) athletes can handle a larger load (again rippetoe, again makes little sense)
c) That sprinters are more hamstring dominant and therefore should low-bar squat.   -> Yes, sprinting requires hamstring strength.  However, the only time when ground contacts are long enough for weight room strength to carryover (the start of a race) the sprinter is using roughly equal parts hamstring/quad/glute.   At top speed ground contacts are 0.1 seconds and the majority of the impulse is created by a stiff straight/almost straight leg making contact with the ground and the hamstings and glutes acting as a hip extensor momentarily to propel you forward.   Unless you are really slow you don't deform and make enough ground contact to break at the hips and activate anywhere near the movement patterns that a low-bar squat provides.  A reverse-hyper or even hamstring makes more sense in this case for specificity to sprinting than the LBS.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now the question that LBSS is really asking is specifically "is my time better spend Low-Bar squatting or high bar squatting as far as standing vertical jump is concerned".   Remember, the goal is to be a beast at all of the above, and they are all related... so clearly both are good.   If you are low-bar squatting and your vertical is going up and your getting faster and your becoming more of a beast... great.    But which is better?  I think the truth is nobody has definite proof.   I'd love to see the results of a study where a bunch of fit, coordinated males with 25-30 inch vertical jumps are put on a diet of only vertical jumps olympic squats or vertical jumps and LBS for 1 year and the benefit of each squat is evaluated.   In the absence of that study all we have is anecdotes.  As I said before:  I have seen many many more guys who have built up a huge low-bar squat despite showing little improvement to the olympic squat, deadlift, front squat, speed, or jumping ability than the other way around.   In other words I have seen a lot of guys get big low-bar squats without becoming much of a beast at all.  This isn't a knock especially against the low-bar squat... I have seen a lot of people with big deadlifts that can't run or jump or front squat at all.   KF seems to agree with this observation.   Now this article by Pendley seems to also suggest this, going so far as to say that his olympic squat brings up his low-bar squat but not that other way around.  (in other words low-bar squats are superflous, kinda how I feel about deadlifts... [ another story]).   Even Fred Hatfield is mentioned stating the claim that olympic squats have much more carryover in general.   

So there you have it.  At this point I think it's a bit unnecessary to analyze the biomechanics of why the olympic squat has been observed by so many people as having more carryover than the low bar squat.  I have some of my own ideas as to why the olympic squat provides more carryover but they are really just broscience conjectures, that I don't think matter much to the argument.    The bottom line seems to me that if your becoming more of a beast on a program centered around low-bar squats than by all means... continue.  But if your low bar squat has gone up but your SVJ/other lifts are stagnant.... considering the observations of many other people and try incorporating some olympic squatting or front squatting into your program.   

Finally, to answer Raptors old question of "What if I do a low-bar squat but I use leg-drive like a high-bar squat".    Obviously the lack of carryover of the LBS relative to the olympic squat is not simply based on exactly where the bar is placed on your back.   If your essentially doing an Olympic squat with funny bar placement... sure carryover is probably more similar to a that of an olympic squat.  But if your coming so close to olympic squatting.... why not just olympic squat?

Pages: 1 ... 43 44 [45] 46 47 ... 58