6526
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Verkhoshansky 6-week peaking phase
« on: February 09, 2011, 02:35:33 am »
Interesting volume to intensity transition...
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
6527
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: a fast and explosive donkey!
« on: February 09, 2011, 02:29:56 am »
I'd trust a humanitarian guy that starts his journal log with "fucking fuck" 
6528
News, Announcements, & Suggestions / Re: Emoticon Suggestions
« on: February 09, 2011, 02:25:10 am »a koala bear emoticon, only to be used when you reach a major goal. koala bear status will be something we can all strive forKoala bearHoney Badger!
Raptor
I use this:
Take a good luck at that picture, you're going to need it after you see me jump!
6529
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: Dave Tate on human potential
« on: February 08, 2011, 04:44:02 pm »
Dave Tate on box squatting:
http://articles.elitefts.com/articles/training-articles/efs-classic-squatting-from-head-to-toe/
http://articles.elitefts.com/articles/training-articles/efs-classic-squatting-from-head-to-toe/
6530
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Strength rankings
« on: February 08, 2011, 04:30:38 pm »
185 kg x 5 reps = 208 kg 1RM according to http://www.exrx.net/Calculators/OneRepMax.html
6531
Article & Video Discussion / Re: Glenn Pendlay on over-prioritizing the squat
« on: February 08, 2011, 01:15:45 pm »While I'm in agreement with Glenn Pendlay, and your post adarqui, I have a question for you: If you add 50kg to your squat, wouldn't you end up moving your old 1-RM faster?
This is a question that would definitely be more oriented towards beginners or advanced novices.
I think it depends...
Say you were finishing your 1RM in 6 seconds. If you gain 50 kg and finish your former 1RM in 5 seconds, is that enough to see a positive influence on your VJ that takes only 0.2 seconds to apply force into?
6532
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: Dave Tate on human potential
« on: February 08, 2011, 01:01:07 pm »
It was a great video for sure. No emo message from me on this one.
6533
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: a fast and explosive donkey!
« on: February 08, 2011, 12:43:05 pm »
WTF are you just saying? 
6534
Crazy Weird Analysis & Stuff :) / Re: Resting Heart Rate
« on: February 08, 2011, 07:22:40 am »Mully, enlighten me, what I got wrong there?
I'm sorry Raptor. I was just joking with you. You are one of the figure icons on this site and have been here longer than me. Will you humbly accept my apology buddy?
I will deal with your beligerant attitude later. Consider yourself dismissed soldier!
6535
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: The Motivational Thread
« on: February 07, 2011, 01:00:28 pm »<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3W_iMve4xvg" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3W_iMve4xvg</a>
Empty your heart of fear
And your body of life.
6536
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Strength rankings
« on: February 07, 2011, 09:23:11 am »I need to film a 140 kg squat at 83 kg weight...
lol, i dno why he wants video to proof it. i think we can believe each other...
I recently squatted 300kg.
6537
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: beast
« on: February 07, 2011, 08:22:38 am »
Air Up There's hamstrings:
6538
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Strength rankings
« on: February 07, 2011, 08:16:31 am »
I need to film a 140 kg squat at 83 kg weight...
6539
Crazy Weird Analysis & Stuff :) / Re: Resting Heart Rate
« on: February 07, 2011, 04:35:15 am »
Mully, enlighten me, what I got wrong there?
6540
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: low bar squat vs high bar squat
« on: February 07, 2011, 04:33:58 am »
I think it's good that the legs are put through a heavier weight by using the low bar techique because more recruitment adaptations can occur CNS-wise. That's why sometimes partials are a good thing: more weight.