5896
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: April 23, 2011, 07:52:45 pm »
That loaded bar looks monstrous.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
5897
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: April 23, 2011, 05:32:12 pm »
Haha, I didn't do that now... that was some time ago (a year or so). My back is fucked because of the Smith Machine and me doing calf raises on that.
5898
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: April 22, 2011, 10:51:19 pm »
Well if I take me as an example, when I used to do unracks it was just my entire core "shaking" and feeling this "twisting" thing going on... like my spine was totally unstable and under the possibility of a little twist. You don't need me to tell you how dangerous that is. But if that's not the case for you, then...
5899
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: April 22, 2011, 07:40:49 pm »
Meaning, you're not actually squatting etc. If you were, you were limited by the ROM, TUT, fatigue, leg strength in disadvantageous positions etc to "help" you prevent using too much. But here, you're only limited by "back strength" but if that fails... there's a much lower threshold for error.
5900
Injury, Prehab, & Rehab talk for the brittlebros / Re: Ankle taping in the NBA
« on: April 22, 2011, 07:10:12 pm »
So what you're actually trying to say is "Get fat, play "ball" and be happy. You're going to be a superstar". I think I've heard this somewhere else before...
5901
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Being heavier does not give "better leverages" in lifting
« on: April 22, 2011, 06:31:36 pm »
I think they mean to "have a bigger belly". They (the powerlifters) say a bigger belly means a bigger "base" for the squat to be executed.
5902
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: April 22, 2011, 06:14:01 pm »I'd definitely use a belt though in these kind of situations, way too much weight for the back's health.
my motto is, if you need a belt, you shouldn't be lifting it..
Mine's too, but you're not actually "lifting". No need for extra danger.
5903
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: April 22, 2011, 03:20:59 pm »
I'd definitely use a belt though in these kind of situations, way too much weight for the back's health.
5904
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: a fast and explosive donkey!
« on: April 22, 2011, 05:41:46 am »
My approach speed increases at lower rims, because at higher rims I have the tendency to take an even longer last step and go slower so I have more time to apply force, but this is while using an one-leg jump. Not sure what kind of jumping you use.
But on lower rims I can go quicker since the rim is lower and my approach becomes better.
But on lower rims I can go quicker since the rim is lower and my approach becomes better.
5905
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: April 22, 2011, 05:39:00 am »
Haha, going crazy with unracking eh? 
5906
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: April 21, 2011, 04:13:09 am »
You mean, 
time 
time
5907
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: beast
« on: April 21, 2011, 04:06:56 am »
It's actually Young Hollywood and it's a screenshot from a clip.
5908
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: beast
« on: April 20, 2011, 03:51:29 pm »holy jesus wtf is that.
Don't know. Squat DR with a tan?
5910
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: April 20, 2011, 06:17:37 am »i like the idea of moving the unracking pins down gradually over time.. not crazy low but enough to get some extra work in at slightly deeper rom.. did that tonight, was good.
Me too, you could even hold it one inch above pin height and do some sort of an iso.