5581
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: June 18, 2011, 04:19:53 am »
Only two footed attempts? Tch tch 
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
5582
ADARQ & LanceSTS - Q&A / Re: Weight lifting shoes
« on: June 18, 2011, 04:15:58 am »
Where could I get some that ship in Romania... anybody knows? Eastbay doesn't have any.
5583
Nature, Wilderness, Hiking, Travel, and Misc Outdoorsy stuff / Dunking Elephant
« on: June 18, 2011, 04:14:21 am »
5584
ADARQ & LanceSTS - Q&A / Re: Weight lifting shoes
« on: June 17, 2011, 09:05:28 am »
I'm for weightlifting shoes although I never wore any... they just look like they're good for lifting. I think Tychver and Kingfish have some.
5585
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: acole14's journal - DUNK OR DIE
« on: June 17, 2011, 03:20:54 am »
How much do you weigh right now?
5586
Injury, Prehab, & Rehab talk for the brittlebros / Re: In Defense Of WRAPS, Especially For Beat Up Knees
« on: June 17, 2011, 03:03:47 am »
I have found out that whenever I use some form of straps on my right knee I always mentally start to "ginger" that knee and load the right leg less. For example in a squat, I can feel the weight moving to the left side just because I feel that strap there and I "believe" I need to load that knee less. It happens pretty much automatically, so...
5587
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: acole14's journal - DUNK OR DIE
« on: June 16, 2011, 09:20:49 am »
411? What kind of monster are you? 
5588
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: Hang Clean Form check please
« on: June 16, 2011, 04:36:42 am »Trying to focus in what lance is teaching in his video.
Focus in JUMPING with the bar...
and I lift like this today:
http://vimeo.com/25169031
100x better man. good work.
Yeah it's actually looking really good in my opinion, especially as that is a dead hang clean and not a hang clean as far as I'm concerned.
5589
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: June 15, 2011, 06:02:52 pm »
Some of those jumps look 40+ by how high your arm is over the rim, is that 10'?
5590
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: beast
« on: June 15, 2011, 01:47:00 pm »
Randy Culpepper:
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8u8oNgbtSAo" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8u8oNgbtSAo</a>
5591
Basketball / Re: LEBRON TO MIAMI HOLY SHIT I AM IN HEAVAN,DONT WAKE ME UP FROM THIS AMAZING DREAM
« on: June 15, 2011, 05:54:15 am »5592
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Why The Lifeline Power Jumper Worked For Me / Greedy For More Gains
« on: June 14, 2011, 04:51:59 pm »
Very interesting. I'll start using my powerjumper again and see what happens. Will probably limit it's use to low box depth jumps and two-leg bounds and broad jumps, since in a one-leg bound, because one leg is flexed, it won't have any effect (or even worse - make the bound imbalanced).
5593
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Starting Strength - Incorporating Half Squats Link..
« on: June 14, 2011, 05:16:44 am »I started at 27 and have more than doubled my SVJ. Although to be fair I was almost intentionally de-training SVJ type qualities by running long distance (20km plus) and being weak as fark (no strength training).
When I first read it I was like "oh man, this guy has a 54 inch vert!".
5594
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Starting Strength - Incorporating Half Squats Link..
« on: June 13, 2011, 04:28:14 pm »
Very unique physical traits? Wait, what?
5595
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Starting Strength - Incorporating Half Squats Link..
« on: June 13, 2011, 10:59:55 am »
I don't think there's such a thing as a "typical" improvement, unless typical means "the guy reaches ~2.5x squat", since that's the squat value were more strength usually won't transfer too good to explosiveness. If you take a guy from a 0.7x squat and get him to 1.5x squat and he improves by 6 inches and stops his squat improvement to 1.5x instead of continuing to get it up to ~2.5, then how can you say that that's his near max ceiling of improvement?
So in reality you could say "your limit in terms of strength to SVJ improvement is probably a 2.5x squat" instead of throwing a number of inches or a % of the original SVJ around.
So if a guy has a 2.5x squat and jumps 26 inches, besides that he must be humongously unexplosive (and he should train that), then yes you could say that maybe the structure is very bad for jumping and therefore he doesn't have much ceiling to improvement.
But if you take formerly weak people, regardless of structure, with say a 1x untrained squat and get them to 2.5x, wouldn't you expect them to improve a lot? The only factor at that point becomes if they ARE ABLE to get to that ~2.5x number.
So in reality you could say "your limit in terms of strength to SVJ improvement is probably a 2.5x squat" instead of throwing a number of inches or a % of the original SVJ around.
So if a guy has a 2.5x squat and jumps 26 inches, besides that he must be humongously unexplosive (and he should train that), then yes you could say that maybe the structure is very bad for jumping and therefore he doesn't have much ceiling to improvement.
But if you take formerly weak people, regardless of structure, with say a 1x untrained squat and get them to 2.5x, wouldn't you expect them to improve a lot? The only factor at that point becomes if they ARE ABLE to get to that ~2.5x number.