Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - TheSituation

Pages: 1 ... 32 33 [34] 35 36 37
496
Bodybuilding / Re: Old School Physiques
« on: November 05, 2010, 06:44:29 pm »
Real men aspire to look like:


497
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: 3x8 or 3x5?
« on: November 05, 2010, 06:00:50 pm »
Well I don't feel like there's another way... I don't see one. It's not like I'm competing in powerlifting, 3 months should be "enough" for strength training.

Slowly bulk up or do 2 weeks bulk/1 week cut instead of bulking for 3 straight months and you won't have to do a long ass cut that will burn all your muscle.

You don't need to put on tons of fat to put on muscle. Most peoples' problem is they are so afraid to put fat on they don't eat enough to put muscle on, so they think they have to get fat. Eat the right amount and you'll be golden.

498
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: 3x8 or 3x5?
« on: November 05, 2010, 03:33:53 pm »
Why?

Not enough time to put on significant muscle, and if you are doing an all out bulk, you're gonna end up burning all the muscle you gained to get off the fat unless you take 6 months to cut.

499
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: 3x8 or 3x5?
« on: November 04, 2010, 11:27:19 pm »
Well my plan is to eat a lot and strength train for ~3 months and then start to cut off fat.

You'll probably end up right where you started

500
Basketball / Re: ripped dunkers
« on: November 03, 2010, 10:52:48 pm »

501
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: 3x8 or 3x5?
« on: November 03, 2010, 08:36:52 pm »
And weight gain is primarily about aesthetics, so I guess you are right and I am wrong. My fault. Everything is about looking good, right? It has to be...

Shirtless Pictures = Showing off aesthetic gains
Pictures of the scale = Showing off weight gain



And to get back on topic, Raptor you don't really have to put a lot of fat on. I went pure bulk for most of my time and then I did 2 weeks bulk/2 weeks cut. I think KellyB suggests 10 days bulk/4 days cut. Same idea. My results weren't spectacular, but I didn't eat enough during the beginning, but I think you'd be satisfied with 20 pounds in a year and a half.

502
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: 3x8 or 3x5?
« on: November 03, 2010, 08:23:27 pm »
I did not comment on it because I have no interest in speculating about Rippetoe's motives to post pictures of Zach. Your perception is that he did that to brag about aesthetic aspects - as if that was the only thing in the world people would have an interest in bragging about. Rip has posted his opinion on training for physique more than once and his thoughts about that lead me to believe that he does not have a motive to brag with anything related to training for aesthetics. But as I said, there is no point in discussing this and I am also not interested in your opinion on the matter.

I also see little value in this "what is more impressive" debate and I think you fail to see the point. You obviously lack the ability to imagine that there are people training for different things then to look good in the mirror and that those people don't train with the goal in mind to impress you with their amazing abs and low body fat percentage. They might not even care how much they weigh, they only care to get stronger. But I am sure this did never occur to you.

P.S.: A box squat is not a squat.

If you aren't trying to impress us with your bodyfat % or your weight, then don't bring it up.

http://startingstrength.com/resources/forum/showthread.php?t=15386


What does he talk about the most in that post? His gain in his squat? No. He talks about how much muscle he gained and how "lean" he is. If the only thing he cared about was getting stronger, he wouldn't have posted any of that. Look at the comments on that forum post. They are talking about his weight gain, because that is what Rippetoe was bragging about. But no, just because anyone in their right mind can tell he just became a fat fuck, to you Rippetoe wasn't bragging about the weight gain at all, just the squat gain.


And I only pushed myself on box squats, so come at me

503
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: 3x8 or 3x5?
« on: November 03, 2010, 07:32:08 pm »
And gaining 65 pounds but only putting on 200 pounds on your squat is pretty lousy imo.

And your best squat was what again?



355 box squat at 182. Not impressive at all, but am I bragging about that? No. All I care about is aesthetic progress, which is why I post shirtless pictures. I don't post shirtless pictures to brag about my squat.

My point is that: You did not even get near his rate of progress in terms of strength, even if you don't care about this aspect, but yet you critique his "poor" squat gains in face of his bodyweight, although you don't even know what it means to make such progress.

I think squatting 355 at 182 is more impressive than 345 x5 (i think he did that) at 242, but to each his own.

Is gaining 200 pounds on your squat impressive? Yes. Is it impressive when you gained 70 pounds and "46 pounds of muscle". No

And I like how you try and pick apart one thing I said (unsuccessfully I might add) and ignore everything else.

504
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: 3x8 or 3x5?
« on: November 03, 2010, 06:55:08 pm »
And gaining 65 pounds but only putting on 200 pounds on your squat is pretty lousy imo.

And your best squat was what again?



355 box squat at 182. Not impressive at all, but am I bragging about that? No. All I care about is aesthetic progress, which is why I post shirtless pictures. I don't post shirtless pictures to brag about my squat.

505
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: 3x8 or 3x5?
« on: November 03, 2010, 06:36:26 pm »
Yeah, I'd be terribly disappointed to gain 100 lbs on my squat while packing 32.5 lbs more weight on me. ;D

I'd be at ~100 kg squatting ~185. ;D

This kid probably never squatted before either, so take into account the neural gains, its even worse.

506
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: 3x8 or 3x5?
« on: November 03, 2010, 06:26:36 pm »
Gaining 45 pounds of muscle and 20 pounds of fat should look pretty good aesthetically. IDC what rippetoe thinks the calipers said, the kid did not gain 45 pounds of muscle. I think taking pictures of the kid without his shirt on his bragging about the aesthetics, or at least trying to show how he progressed aesthetically. I don't know too many people who brag about putting 200 pounds on their squat by posting a shirtless picture, where they look like theyve gained no muscle.

And gaining 65 pounds but only putting on 200 pounds on your squat is pretty lousy imo.

507
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: 3x8 or 3x5?
« on: November 03, 2010, 03:49:53 pm »
The reason Zach gets made fun of is because Rippetoe bragged about how much muscle and how little fat he put on.  Rippetoe is the reason the kid gets made fun of online, because he was bragging about the Aesthetic part of it. If he just talked about how he got his squat up 200 pounds in 6 months, then nobody would care.

Rip was claiming like 45 pounds of muscle and 20 pounds of fat or something ridiculous like that.

508
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: 3x8 or 3x5?
« on: November 03, 2010, 03:37:41 pm »
Yes. 4 in a pack for 7 dollars, yes sir.

509
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: 3x8 or 3x5?
« on: November 03, 2010, 02:36:45 pm »
N00bem, how did I contradict myself? I said macros don't matter as long as you get the right amount of protein. 160 grams of protein is about 640 calories. That's not a full diet. You need to get at least 2000 calories from other places if you plan on bulking. That's the part that doesn't matter (imo). Sure you got other factors like the thermal effect of certain foods, gi index, insulin sensity, etc. But I don't think that makes a significant difference.

And you can think it's dumb, I really don't care. My body was made on pizza, whole milk, candy, soda and cheeseburgers and I'd say I'm pretty lean. Once your body makes the maximum amount of muscle it can naturally (this number is debated, but let's say 2-3 pounds a month), anything excess calories will get stored as fat. It doesn't matter where those calories came from. You're not putting on 10 pounds of muscle a month just because you ate only "clean" foods






Dirty bulking makes you fat right? That's about a 20 pound difference from the first to the 4th pic. How much of that do you think was fat? And those aren't noob gains either. My noob gains came before the first picture. I was skinny as fuck.

(If the fourth picture doesn't load for you, go to my log)

510
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: 3x8 or 3x5?
« on: November 02, 2010, 07:56:12 pm »
Because in order to get a high caloric intake, I need carbs and shit. Fat is going to increase. I can't worry "OMG I don't want to gain fat, so I won't eat that and that". I'm already taking just a protein shake with no carbs, maybe I should plus on the carb thing with that as well.

I'm not really a fan of dirty bulks, this guy is massive & has a pretty good grasp on gaining lean mass, so he's more of an authoritative figure than myself:

http://www.adarq.org/forum/nutrition-supplementation/a-post-by-mountain-man-on-body-composition/msg19994/#msg19994

^^ here's who is giving that advice: http://www.adarq.org/forum/bodybuilding/scary-motherfawkers/msg19988/#msg19988

just saying, you can eat cleaner & gain muscle without putting on very much fat at all, you just need to eat more of the right kinds of foods (eggs/meat/chicken/milk/protein supp/green veggies) & less of the bad kinds of foods (junk/sugars/huge servings of pasta/bread etc).. You can of course eat pasta/bread, but it should be in smaller portions. Stuffing your face with carbs is never a good idea for bulking imo.

Anyway, any time you think about just stuffing your face with trash to put on muscle, just look at this pic, it'll save your life:



dirty bulking = lame.

pc







Quote
The advantage that I see for the olympic lifts and their variants over exercises such as jump squats is that they are better scalable and also involve a more complete pattern of hip flexion/extension. That does not mean that jump squats are a bad exercise, Kelly Bagget posted a nice variation here a while ago where you make jump squats and try to touch a band overhead with each rep. I like this idea since it makes progressing in that exercise a lot more quantifiable.

nice

I disagree. I only dirty bulk (and when I cut I dirty cut) and I'm leaner than I ever have been. The reason dreamer got so fat is because he ate way too much and lifted with 0 intensity (if he even lifted at all). Rippetoe's kid lifted hard but ate way too much. He did Gomad on top of what he was already eating. So if he was eating enough for maintenance, add 2400 calories to that. About 500-750 max will go into muscle building and the rest goes into fat storage. It has nothing to do with the dirty bulk. Adding 2400 calories of chicken breast would have given him the same results.

For me, it's always been a matter of calories in, calories out (as long as you get the "right" amount of protein. Eating 15 twix bars may have the right amount of calories (3750 which is pretty good for bulking purposes) but it won't give you the results of a balanced diet). It may be different for others, but that's how its been for me. Obviously I'm just talking about weight gain/loss, not overall health. A clean diet would be way better for my health, but for muscle building purposes, who knows.

When I say dirty bulk, I'm saying eat whatever you want as long as you get the right amount of calories and enough protein (maybe 1g per pound of bodyweight. that's more than enough). I'm not saying eat whatever you want and disregard calories, acquire muscle.


And the easiest way to get calories in is to eat fat. You can do it easily with few carbs.

Pages: 1 ... 32 33 [34] 35 36 37