Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Daballa100

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7
46
Article & Video Discussion / Re: What's wrong with the barbell squat?
« on: February 04, 2012, 07:42:36 pm »
lol, yeah the hip capsule stretch really hits that hip hard, especially with that distraction.  Most people have femurs that come forward in the socket, because they sit all day, so that helps clear things up an reapproximate the femur.

Yeah, Frank is a cool guy, just terrible squat form.  Still strong, well, not so much anymore, because of his "get authentic" bodybuilding.

Do the sets on feel, one set is fine if you really work hard with it for a minute or 2 or 3.  Really try to spend quality time hunting around when you stretch, don't just hold it.  You should look to find tight areas, and really get uncomfortable, sometimes you might feel like vomiting a little(don't do it though), to really push your ROM.  I know this goes against what a lot of people are taught when it comes to stretching, but it's more effective, and time efficient, just make sure your not on any nerves, or feel any pinching.  If you ever feel sharp pains, or nervy pains, you should probably stop, or relocate your position.

On that static stretching pre-workout, it's fine.  Studies do show that power output decreases after static stretching, but in many of those studies, power output decreases by like 2%.  It really doesn't make a huge difference.  Besides, when you lose good position, you lose power.  You can't enter a workout broken(in terms of posture/position) and expect great power output.  In that case, you would be working against yourself, because your body is not in optimal alignment.  I've set many jump PRs on days where I static stretched pre-workout because I felt tight in my hips.  Just make sure you get a good warm up in after the stretching, and you do glute activation stuff, etc.

47
I've never tried that Kingfish, I feel like a pussy now, because I roll my quads with a lacrosse ball.  SMR work on the quads definitely helps with the pulling on the knee.

The Kelly B. article looks good too, it really helps to improve pelvic posture, and stretch the rectus femoris when your knees are fucked up.  I'm assuming it's real jumper's knee, because you squat 400+ lbs.

When you do SMR on the quad, you should also try some "tack and stretch" meaning you enter flexion and extension while SMRing.  You "tack" down the tissue using your implement, and then you flex the knee, to stretch the quad while it's pinned down.  You should focus mostly on the suprapatellar pouch.  It's very effective, almost like ART.

If that doesn't work you can also do some compression wrapping.  Basically you just take a single band(a strip, not an actual loop) and wrap it around your quad tightly(to the point where it almost feels numb), right above the knee, around the supra-patellar pouch.  Then you can proceed to do bodyweight squats, and other movements.  This is similar to the tack and stretch, albeit more effective.  You can even combine this compression wrapping with a Rectus Femoris stretch, to really get at that quad.

Don't be afraid to do extra hip mobility in your free time, and soft tissue work.  Really try to get aggressive with that stuff.

Oh yeah, if you don't have a band you can cut in half to make a strip, you can order them on jumpstretch.com, look for "PT strength strips."  If you're cheap like me you can buy a bike innertube tire, cut the stem off, and cut the thing in half, so you get strips as well.

48
Article & Video Discussion / Re: What's wrong with the barbell squat?
« on: February 04, 2012, 09:47:20 am »
Nahh, I meant this stretch: @ around 3:10 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SE-yVP691SA&feature=related

Those other stretches he shows in that vid you showed are nice too if you don't have space, don't have a band, or if you want to change it up.  You can still do that stretch at 3:10 without a band though.

Yeah that groin stretch I like a lot, you can do that on the floor too if you don't have a nice soft bed or couch to put your leg on.  You can even use lateral distraction on that too if you can.

For calf stretching this is what I prefer: @ around 1:15  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLj_VkfQzJI

Again, you don't have to use a band, but it's always preferred.  You can use a box like he does, or you can just use a wall.  You should probably wear a shoe(make sure it's a low top) so the foot can grip on the wall.


About that Frank Yang video.  He's strong, but his squat there is just atrocious.  His knee wouldn't go in as much if he shoved his knees out first before descending to the bottom.  Even if you have straight feet, you can still get a lot of valgus knee, but shoving you knees out WITH straight feet will get you the best results in terms of knee position/safety/power in my opinion.

You also have to consider that he's stopping at parallel so there are 2 things going wrong: 1) The bottom A2G recieving position, to get some soft tissue bounce(I say soft tissue because, you don't want to bounce on your ligaments or capsule alone, you should use a combination of muscle tension, muscle capsule, AND ligaments to receive load)  2)  Stopping at parallel means the knees are at 90 degrees of flexion, which is the weakest position for the knee(the strongest being in full flexion, and full extension), so he reverses when his knee is at it's weakest point.

I'm not saying you have to use A2G when squatting for athletic performance, I'm just saying that A2G is nice when you want to squat and receive  heavy loads(when trained right, it's actually easier going A2G)

For your alternating exercises shiz, I'll post later, on that board, I don't want this to look like another wall of text.

EDIT:  Oh yeah, didn't see the stretching thing at the bottom, I'll post that hear, because it's more relevant.

Stretching for minutes is fine, as long as it's not like 10+ min. spent in one position.  You should however, go on feel.  You couldn't possibly performs all the stretches he talks about(on his mwod project he probably has a couple dozen) for a good quality 2 min.  Everyday, and after your workouts(and even before you workout if you need the extra ROM) you should spend 10-15 minutes on stretching or soft tissue work.  Pick 2-3 stretches and do them for 1-4 minutes each.  Make sure you pick body parts that need more ROM or are getting real beat up.  The rest of the time remaining can be for soft tissue work and stuff like that.  Quality stretching(spending a couple minutes on what is bad), instead of quantity(stretching every muscle in the body everyday).  Stretching should not be like exercising like you "just do it"(like a routine).  It should be based on how you feel, and where your really banged up.

49
Article & Video Discussion / Re: What's wrong with the barbell squat?
« on: February 03, 2012, 01:36:18 pm »
@PointerRyan I like the Split squat stretch, it hits the rectus femoris and other tissues well.  Other than that, all the stretches aren't as "good" as the stretches from mobility wod.  They are still effective, but honestly I've seen way more results in terms of ROM with those stretches, they're almost magic.  You'll definitely liberate more range of motion if you learn those stretches, it's definitely worth it.

As for the rest, hamstring stretching is dependent on the case, but if you can feel the stretch in the middle of the hamstring, you can keep going with that if you want.  The external rotation stretch isn't TOO useful if you don't apply FADIR(flexion, adduction, internal rotation) but isn't  useless.  In that external rotation stretch you're in extension still, so it's not as effective.  If you do stretch using a position using FADIR, make sure you do not feel any pinching or impingement, or else that could be femoral acetabular impingement. 

The adductor magnus stretch is decent, but I prefer going into a lunge, and driving the elbow to the floor, but it doesn't matter as much.

Definitely omit the spine twist dude, bad idea for the lumbar segments, they shouldn't have excessive mobility.

... I'll answer the rest later, and I like LBSS's idea, squatting with a small amount of weight in the bottom position definitely helps, you can even do it with a dumbbell going with a "goblet squat."  It really helps put you down into a new ROM, sorta like a PNF stretch.  It really helps to use your elbows to shove your knees out when you do these goblet squats too.

Edit:  So yeah, just do what you can with your current ROM, and then maybe you can change your stance, foot position, etc over time.  I would say the most ideal foot range would be 0-10 degrees out, but like I said, it depends on your current ROM, and you can improve it over time,  and yeah hit your calves like what LBSS said too.  Try to use the wall stretch, where you put the ball of your foot on a wall and push your knee to the wall.  Much more effective other calf stretches, because your calf does not have to work during the stretch.

That part about the knees/toes, kind of hard to understand what you are saying, but I think you said that you will ignore your knees being over your toes?  If so, then yeah, no restrictions there, just make sure you shove your knees out too.

Arches collapsing just means your foot goes flat lol,  Weight gets distributed unevenly on your foot, causing the arch to collapse(going flat), letting the ankle collapse, affecting things upstream like the knee.  The opposite is also true, if the knee collapses, so do the ankles and arches of the feet.

50
Article & Video Discussion / Re: What's wrong with the barbell squat?
« on: February 02, 2012, 08:22:30 pm »
1) Yeah it would be very painful at all times, most likely.

2) About having your low back stressed out, it may be due to overactive erector spinae.  That is, your erectors tighten up and are hypertonic to compensate for having a weak L2 segment.  This is only an assumption, many people go on for years with back pain and never get a good diagnosis with proper treatment.  If you want a good diagnosis you would need hands on work with someone who is very well informed, but people like that are rare.

3) You pretty much wanna hit everything around the hips first, prioritizing that, and then hit the t-spine.  When addressing mobility you don't wanna hit "muscles" really.  Just certain movements.  It gets too complicated because the hip joint has a complex system of muscles that performs multiple tasks. 

The most effective stretches I've used were taken from a guy named Kelly Starrett on Youtube.  Look up Mobility Wod, and it will pop right up.  Don't be offended that he's crossfit, he's got some decent stuff.  I can't really give you the vids without it being a complete mess, because many of his vids have more than one topic, and he addresses some issues more than once(there are 300+ videos to boot).  Just skim at the first 10-15, and he'll give you some of the basic ones for the hip.

Try these:

Hip flexor stretch w/anterior band distraction*

External rotation hip capsule stretch w/ lateral distraction

Internal rotation hip capsule stretch w/lateral distraction

Rectus Femoris stretch (split squat with foot elevated on bench/chair)


*Band distraction (by this i mean hook a band on something sturdy like a power rack, couch,etc. and load up your hip by using band tension) is optional, but really helps in the case of any impingement, and is more effective.

Yeah, make sure you do SMR/soft tissue work too(this is very important if you want healthy tissues), with a lacrosse ball(very cheap 3 for like $5), and a foam roller($20-30 after shipping usually).

Don't be afraid to hit a lot of these hard for more than 2min. if you have time/want to.

4) Yeah... dude keep doing the glute activation work, it definitely helps pre-workout.  Activation stuff + stretching + soft tissue work may seem like a lot, but it helps in the long run.  Just make sure you don't just "do" the stretches or soft tissue work.  Do that based on how you feel, and how your joints feel.

5) Toes out opens up the hips and knees a lot, allowing you to shove the knees out and for greater depth when lacking range of motion.  Toes forward will allow you to generate more torque, and more tension in the bottom position(assuming you shove your knees out here too), but is much harder to pull off because many lack proper joint range in the hips.

Think about it like this, when you squat toes out, you open up the hip naturally, because external rotation tends to follow the feet pointing out, however at the cost of the knee being unlocked medially.  Many argue that you need to point your feet out because you when the femur is externally rotated, the knees move out, so the feet out will allow the "knees to track with the toes."  Although this may be a good idea, if the hip ever loses external rotation, that means the knee will come with it as well.  This internal rotation will cause the knee to twist in, causing misalignment in the femur/tibia, and then you can possibly tear an ACL or MCL.

When you squat feet straight,  you can still externally rotate if you have proper hip range in both internal rotation and external rotation, but like I said, that is difficult for some.  The plus here is that, even if you lose external rotation during the movement, your knee is locked, meaning you cannot "twist" it in, because it will only move back to neutral because of your foot position.  This also creates more torque in the bottom position, which can be good or bad depending on how flexible you are.  If you are very flexible you can take advantage and use a more powerful "bounce" out of the bottom using the soft tissues like the adductors, instead of bouncing off passive tissues.  Many argue that "the knees do not track the toes" in this type of squat, but most people have excessive valgus(knee caving in) anyway.  The knee is in a much more stable position when the knees come out anyway, we shouldn't have to worry about excessive varus(knees out) angle for most individuals.

Wide vs narrow stance depends on how much muscle capsule length(hip capsule) you have.  Wide puts more stress on the capsule, which is not necessarily good or bad(really depends on individual's mobility).

A lot of people will argue, but both squats are fine imo, as long as the knee does not internally rotate.  You should also watch out for arches of the foot collapsing during a toes out squat too, but that isn't as important as knee position

Sorry if this is long, lol.  Let me know if there are questions you want answered or any mistakes in there, typing stuff all at once isn't my thing.

51
Injury, Prehab, & Rehab talk for the brittlebros / Re: Rehab Mode + Results
« on: February 02, 2012, 03:36:19 pm »
Shouldn't you also consider you were injured when you were jumping lower?  I won't argue against you in the motor patterns and glute activation work, but I'm very sure doing heavy squatting AND improving motor patterns will get you the best results. 

52
Article & Video Discussion / Re: What's wrong with the barbell squat?
« on: February 02, 2012, 03:33:06 pm »
I'll answer more in depth later on what you asked.  I gotta go hit the gym.  I'll probably get to it tonight

53
Article & Video Discussion / Re: What's wrong with the barbell squat?
« on: February 01, 2012, 04:57:12 pm »
@PointerRyan Your "tail bone" has no growth plates.  Growth plates are only present on the "long bones" of your body.  Those are the bones like your femur, tibia, humerus, etc. which have considerable length in comparison to other bones.  The tail bone is an irregular bone, so it has no growth plates.  Also, regarding pain with growth plate injuries, it's a part of your actual bone, so I would imagine it would feel like fracturing your bone normally.

About squatting, many of you know this, but I'll say it anyway.  During the squat forces on the lumbar are more dangerous when the lower back is rounded.  Regular human spines can usually take 12,000-18,000N of compressive force(back is straight) before buckling but can only take 1800-2800N of sheer force(back is rounded).  Thus, it is very important to limit as much lumbar motion as possible when under load.  Compressive force really isn't as much of a problem in my opinion.  Compressive forces can be mitigated through good core strength, and decompressing the spine.  Hanging from a chin up bar can help decompress the spine a bit.

My advice would be to not only get a squat vid up, but also to stretch regularly and do soft tissue work.  T-spine mobility and hip mobility should be staples in an athletic program, especially when the athlete has issues with the lumbar.  Get a foam roller(or rumble roller), lacrosse ball, some bands, and go get it.  They are all very cheap.  Without mobility in the hips, alterations to the pelvis can occur(anterior pelvic tilt, femoral acetabular impingement, blah blah blah, etc.) which will obviously throw off good position in the squat.  Without thoracic mobility you won't be able to "keep your chest up" during the squat.  Doing all of this may sound tedious, but it's definitely worth it, because you will feel better and move much more fluidly.

Also, you might want to drop stretches that involve back rounding(touch your toes stuff like that).  There is a reason why many chiropractors are getting lawsuits for using flexion-distraction techniques.  Always stretch with respect to the spine, and treat the spine like one joint when doing so(keep your back straight!!).

54
Article & Video Discussion / Re: Hang Snatch Alternative
« on: January 26, 2012, 05:52:44 pm »
About the low bar vs high bar shenanigans, like what others said, it probably doesn't matter as long as you're strong, but I would agree with TODDAY.  High bar is more specific and has a little more carry over than low bar for olympic lifts.  Olympic lifting is already so "quad dominant" and relying so much on being upright, that one might say high bar IS the p-chain exercise of choice for an olympic lifter.  It depends on your dimensions, but I know high bar gets plenty of p-chain for me.

The back angle and the starting position of the low bar squat and the classical lifts(steven brought it up) could be argued, but the first pull usually isn't a problem for a lot of people.

For regular athletes, front squat and high bar back squat might be a little redundant.

Are you an o-lifter? Where do you get the information from that o-lifting is about "being upright"? This could not be further from the truth. Also, standing up after you made the catch is not where most of the difficulty is either for the majority of lifters.

Nah, I'm not an olympic lifter.  What do you mean about by, "further from the truth?"  By upright I meant the catch position.  If you're an olympic lifter, I would like to hear your opinion.

Edit: I would like your opinion regardless, but it would be nice to know if you're an o-lifter.

55
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Random rant
« on: January 26, 2012, 05:17:43 pm »
I personally loved squatting everyday after I tried out some stuff from Adarqui's LTMP post.  I never went heavy on the LTMP sessions, but squatting everyday was fun.  My squat went up, because my technique always felt dead on.  My jumps went up a little too, but there are a couple problems for me.

1) Lack of easy access to a power rack, squat rack, stand, etc.
2) Driving to the gym takes up tons of gas money (commercial gym)
3) Auto regulation can be risky sometimes

I've been thinking of just getting a power rack at home, but then I wouldn't have money for a gym(and there goes my access to an indoor court during the winter).

I agree with you on moving heavy weights helping you out, even if improvement is just movement efficiency.

56
Article & Video Discussion / Re: Hang Snatch Alternative
« on: January 26, 2012, 05:05:23 pm »
About the low bar vs high bar shenanigans, like what others said, it probably doesn't matter as long as you're strong, but I would agree with TODDAY.  High bar is more specific and has a little more carry over than low bar for olympic lifts.  Olympic lifting is already so "quad dominant" and relying so much on being upright, that one might say high bar IS the p-chain exercise of choice for an olympic lifter.  It depends on your dimensions, but I know high bar gets plenty of p-chain for me.

The back angle and the starting position of the low bar squat and the classical lifts(steven brought it up) could be argued, but the first pull usually isn't a problem for a lot of people.

For regular athletes, front squat and high bar back squat might be a little redundant.

57
Article & Video Discussion / Re: Hang Snatch Alternative
« on: January 25, 2012, 08:03:41 pm »
@TODDAY No, Steven's back squat is very deep.  It's the one Mark Rippetoe teaches I believe.  Low bar with oly lifting shoes.  Not like a geared powerlifting squat barely hitting parallel.

58
Article & Video Discussion / Re: Hang Snatch Alternative
« on: January 22, 2012, 07:30:09 pm »
@ Steven I understand your point I guess.

@ Avishek Wow, that's crazy.  I've read all that Joe D. stuff on oly lifting, but I always thought of it as defending himself for not using oly lifts, not saying weighted jumps are better for performance.  Those studies look interesting, and I agree, most power with 0% 1RM wtf??  Wouldn't that mean that your 2 studies contradict each other?  The first study says bodyweight is better, 2nd study says that power cleans are better than heavy squats and bodyweight jumps together.  I'll take my time with these studies later.

59
Article & Video Discussion / Re: Hang Snatch Alternative
« on: January 22, 2012, 04:09:16 pm »
@Avishek thanks, I didn't know it was that simple, I'll keep that in mind when I post in the future.

@Steven IMO it's safer for someone who can't drop the weight.  Failing/missing a lift with the weight overhead can be worse than failing with it on your upper back.  I don't think I've seen Raptor squat heavy without safeties, but without spotters yes.  Commercial gyms are more likely to have at least one power rack as opposed to platforms and bumper plates.

It's just an alternative for someone without equipment, it's not better than the snatch and it's variations.  You say that you didn't need to drop weights until you hit 100kg in your power clean, but what happens after that?  They just keep using 100kg for there power cleans?  Eventually you would have to look somewhere else for your strength speed exercises.

60
Article & Video Discussion / Re: Hang Snatch Alternative
« on: January 20, 2012, 06:31:24 pm »
Just saw this vid posted by Daniel from JumpScience.com.  Looks like a good alternative until one learns how to do a snatch properly.  Maybe even better for jumping purposes?  Has anyone ever tried these before or know what they're called (I doubt this is a new exercise)?

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jb2llL7TE8M" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jb2llL7TE8M</a>

It's clear that the individual in the video would be unable to perform a snatch/powersnatch with okay form. That does not mean that the same applies to you though. Just learn how, it works better than what he does and it is a scalable exercise. Therefore snatches and their variations allow training to happen. Jumping around without a clue is not training.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unIULU43XpY&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL

Don't know how to embed video, but Daniel's Power Snatch looks okay.  Daniel recommends Hang Snatches, and other oly lifting moves in his jump programs, but I think he uploaded this for people who didn't have equipment. like bumper plates, or for people who have strict gyms that don't allow olympic lifting or stuff like that.  I agree that the Hang Snatch is still better, and can be self taught.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7