Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - vag

Pages: 1 ... 297 298 [299] 300 301 ... 341
4471
Niceeeee , that's why i didnt fill anything in the data substruct.
The "athlete" data will be input on the beginning ( assesment func ).
But they will also be modified during the process.

ok , v1.1 patch:

struct UltimateTrainer
{
     int assesmentFunc();
     int trainingFunc();
    int updateAthleteData();
    int reFormTrainingPlan();
     int evaluationFunc();
     struct trainingData{
        uA_bioanalysis_t        bioanalysis; // height, weight, age, name.. contains pointers to muscleanalysis, boneanalysis, etc
        uA_injury_history_t    injury_history; // list of bone, tendon, ligament, etc injuries sustained
        uA_training_history_t training_history; // linked list of training programs/systems utilized, including sub-lists of training sessions per day, also including the pre-testing & post-testing results for each training program
        uA_muscles_t            muscleanalysis; // linked list of each muscle group, force & length/tension characteristics, dynamic/static/passive flexibility characteristics, injury history list, circumference/CSA - complete mapping, fiber composition, tendon lengths to insertion on bone
        uA_bones_t               boneanalysis; // list of bone lengths, csa's - complete mapping, bone density
        uA_braintype_t          brainanalysis; // the conscious & subconscious psychological aspects of the athlete
        uA_diet_t                  dietaryanalysis; // a list of days with sublists to each meal/snack/liquid intake for that day, based per 24hour period
        uA_sleep_t                sleepanalysis; // a list the sleep habits experien        ....
        ....
        ....
     }*data;
}



And the main function changes to:

runUltimateTrainer( struct UltimateTrainer *my_trainer )
{
    my_trainer->assesmentFunc( my_trainer->data);
    do{
         my_trainer->trainingFunc( my_trainer->data);
        my_trainer->updateAthleteData( my_trainer->data );
        my_trainer->reformTrainingPlan( my_trainer->data );// this will be just dummy if no change is needed.
    }while( my_trainer->evaluationFunc() != END_TRAINING );
}

 :P  :P  :P

4472
v.1.0

Uh-Oh , it's getting serious...  :o

Hahahahaha , epic x 2 , that's exactly what i thought you would reply , word-by-word! :D

I typed mine on the go too.  :D
Funny thing , i really liked the whole idea and afterwards my mind has been working on the complete design pattern of that shit. An object oriented design , where depending on user we will load the apropriate function , that will be pretty epic but it comes pretty close to what i do at work so it ruins the fun of being in here , LOLLLLLLLLLLL

Oh well, here's a fast version of it , on the go again:

struct UltimateTrainer
{
     int assesmentFunc();
     int trainingFunc();
     int evaluationFunc();
     struct trainingData{
        ....
        ....
        ....
     }*data;
}

int goGetIt( string *athlete )
{
    struct UltimateTrainer *my_trainer

    my_trainer = initAthletesTrainer( athlete );
    runUltimateTrainer( my_trainer );
}

struct UltimateTrainer initAthletesTrainer( string *athlete )
{
    UltimateTrainer *my_trainer  = malloc( ...);

    if( athlete == 'raptor' ){
        assesmentFunc = aquireListOfSafeExcercises( my_trainer->data );
        trainingrFunc = attemptFatLoss( my_trainer->data );
        evaluationFunc = checkIfFatLossAchieved( my_trainer->data );
    }
     return my_trainer;
}

runUltimateTrainer( struct UltimateTrainer *my_trainer )
{
    my_trainer->assesmentFunc( my_trainer->data);
    do{
         my_trainer->trainingFunc( my_trainer->data);
    }while( my_trainer->evaluationFunc() != my_trainer->data->user_goal );
}

HAHAHAHA , loving it!  ;D  ;D  ;D

Pretty geeky too  :-\ , LETS NERD THE FUCK OUT!  :headbang:


4473
v.0.2

adarq LEVELS IT UP!


epic post, hall of fame status.






adjusted for raptor:

typedef struct exercises {
char * name;
int status;
} exercise_t;

exercise_t exercises[EXERCISE_MAX];


void fat_loss_phase( void )
{
    project_plan = init_fat_los_plan();
    init_exercise_list();
    do{
        iok = attemptFatLoss( project_plan );
        if( iok != continue_current_plan ){
             project_plan = adjust_project_plan()
        }
    }while( iok != fat_loss_achieved )
}

int attemptFatLoss( int project_plan )
{
    int iret;
    exercise_t * ex;


    ex = provide_safe_exercises();
    if(ex == NULL) { puts("you're fucked, relax"); exit(1); }

    if( doFatLoss( ex, project_plan ) != succesfull ){
         iret = needs_adjust;
    }else{
        if( isFatLossComplete() ){
            iret = fat_loss_achieved;
        }else{
            iret = continue_current_plan;
        }
    }
    return iret;
}

#define EXERCISE_CURRENTLY_SAFE 0
#define EXERCISE_CURRENTLY_UNSAFE_AND_PROBLEMATIC 1
#define EXERCISE_CURRENTLY_UNSAFE_DONT_FUCKING_DO_IT 2

exercise_t * provide_safe_exercises(void) {
exercise_t * ex = NULL;
int i; for(i=0;i<EXERCISE_MAX;i++) { if(!(exercises.status == 1 || exercises.status == 2)) { ex = &exercise; break; }}
return ex;
}





ok typed that out real quick, hope it compiles.

lulz

4474
v.0.1

The idea being born talking about raptor's fat loss phase :

Well I don't feel like there's another way... I don't see one. It's not like I'm competing in powerlifting, 3 months should be "enough" for strength training.

3 months is not that much but its not little either. From personal experience your main concern should be the cutting phase , it is imperative to maintain strength in order to avoid yo-yo.
So connecting that to JCs post , IMO 3 months of bulking are enough to put some serious mass and strength , but then yo umust plan the fat-loss phase really good. I would suggest caloric deficit and increased cardio combined with heavy singles ( MSEM ) workouts & big eating. It should be more like a try-catch approach , start with a scheme ( low eating + MSEM ) , see how your body responds to it , adjust , retry and so on...

void fat_loss_phase( void )
{
    project_plan = init_fat_los_plan();
    do{
        iok = attemptFatLoss( project_plan );
        if( iok != continue_current_plan ){
             project_plan = adjust_project_plan()
        }
    }while( iok != fat_loss_achieved )
}

int attemptFatLoss( int project_plan )
{
    int iret;

    if( doFatLoss( project_plan ) != succesfull ){
         iret = needs_adjust;
    }else{
        if( isFatLossComplete() ){
            iret = fat_loss_achieved;
        }else{
            iret = continue_current_plan;
        }
    }
    return iret;
}


Note that this programm deliberately doesn't have an abort case , it will continue forever untill you succeed!

GO GET IT!


4475
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: 3x8 or 3x5?
« on: November 07, 2010, 05:25:34 am »
dude this is epic, we need to create a separate thread for this.. re-post your little pseudo's in this thread:

http://www.adarq.org/forum/strength-power-reactivity-speed-discussion/advanced-theory-programming-of-the-human-organism/new/#new

i added your initial post to topic hall of fame thread, check it, because the pseudo code actually crashes safari, how funny is that..



hahaha , yup , that whole concept is very funny :D
on the other hand its very serious too , applies the KISS method , as long ass you know what to pick from the infinite pool of S&C info around... but it allways comes down to doing 2-3 simple things.
You acutally tried to compile it? its not pseudo , its C , just some funcs missing because i was too bored.

4476
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: 3x8 or 3x5?
« on: November 07, 2010, 05:08:44 am »
Hahahahaha , epic x 2 , that's exactly what i thought you would reply , word-by-word! :D

I typed mine on the go too.  :D
Funny thing , i really liked the whole idea and afterwards my mind has been working on the complete design pattern of that shit. An object oriented design , where depending on user we will load the apropriate function , that will be pretty epic but it comes pretty close to what i do at work so it ruins the fun of being in here , LOLLLLLLLLLLL

Oh well, here's a fast version of it , on the go again:

struct UltimateTrainer
{
     int assesmentFunc();
     int trainingFunc();
     int evaluationFunc();
     struct trainingData{
        ....
        ....
        ....
     }*data;
}

int goGetIt( string *athlete )
{
    struct UltimateTrainer *my_trainer

    my_trainer = initAthletesTrainer( athlete );
    runUltimateTrainer( my_trainer );
}

struct UltimateTrainer initAthletesTrainer( string *athlete )
{
    UltimateTrainer *my_trainer  = malloc( ...);

    if( athlete == 'raptor' ){
        assesmentFunc = aquireListOfSafeExcercises( my_trainer->data );
        trainingrFunc = attemptFatLoss( my_trainer->data );
        evaluationFunc = checkIfFatLossAchieved( my_trainer->data );
    }
     return my_trainer;
}

runUltimateTrainer( struct UltimateTrainer *my_trainer )
{
    my_trainer->assesmentFunc( my_trainer->data);
    do{
         my_trainer->trainingFunc( my_trainer->data);
    }while( my_trainer->evaluationFunc() != my_trainer->data->user_goal );
}

HAHAHAHA , loving it!  ;D  ;D  ;D

Pretty geeky too  :-\ , LETS NERD THE FUCK OUT!  :headbang:

4477
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: My calves.
« on: November 07, 2010, 04:47:54 am »
That's interesting. So you are against the negative part? I do my calve raises on those elevated pad machines , so i go from negative to full extention , should i switch them to feet flat on the ground and just raise?

4478
Bodybuilding / Re: Old School Physiques
« on: November 05, 2010, 06:57:15 pm »
Honorable mention , he is old school by now  ;D






4479
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: 3x8 or 3x5?
« on: November 05, 2010, 06:50:21 pm »

Hahaha , no copyright , its a gift to the adarq.org community 8)

4480
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: 3x8 or 3x5?
« on: November 05, 2010, 06:23:46 pm »
Well I don't feel like there's another way... I don't see one. It's not like I'm competing in powerlifting, 3 months should be "enough" for strength training.

3 months is not that much but its not little either. From personal experience your main concern should be the cutting phase , it is imperative to maintain strength in order to avoid yo-yo.
So connecting that to JCs post , IMO 3 months of bulking are enough to put some serious mass and strength , but then yo umust plan the fat-loss phase really good. I would suggest caloric deficit and increased cardio combined with heavy singles ( MSEM ) workouts & big eating. It should be more like a try-catch approach , start with a scheme ( low eating + MSEM ) , see how your body responds to it , adjust , retry and so on...

void fat_loss_phase( void )
{
    project_plan = init_fat_los_plan();
    do{
        iok = attemptFatLoss( project_plan );
        if( iok != continue_current_plan ){
             project_plan = adjust_project_plan()
        }
    }while( iok != fat_loss_achieved )
}

int attemptFatLoss( int project_plan )
{
    int iret;

    if( doFatLoss( project_plan ) != succesfull ){
         iret = needs_adjust;
    }else{
        if( isFatLossComplete() ){
            iret = fat_loss_achieved;
        }else{
            iret = continue_current_plan;
        }
    }
    return iret;
}


Note that this programm deliberately doesn't have an abort case , it will continue forever untill you succeed!

GO GET IT!

4481

THE RATIO TECHNIQUE BIG EXPERIMENT:






BLUE = current
RED = pending
GREEN = done



5 November 2010

PHASE 1 - Cycle 3 - Hypertrophy Workout 3

Bodyweight@session : ~195 , grrrr , 10 days of reduced gym frequency and i lost 1kg ,  :pissed:
Injuries/aches : none
Soreness : none

SQUATS :
1x6@187
1x6@209 , ( +deeper ROM )
1x6@231
1x6@264 , ( +11 lbs , 6 rep PR tie )
187 & 209 sub-parallel , 231 & 264 half-squats.
Very happy with the 209 ATG set and of course the 6-rep-PR tie.

BSS:
1x8@176
1x8@198
1x8@220 , ( +deeper ROM )
220 better than last time , still not full though.

LEG CURLS:
1x8@99
1x8@110
1x8@121
1x8@132

SINGLE LEG STANDING CALVE RAISES:
1x12@110
1x12@121
1x12@132 , ( +1 rep , LOL )

2 more workouts to end phase-1 but its explosive &MSEM, so END HYPERTROPHY ORIENTED WORKOUTS!

4482
Basketball / Re: Did we all just get clamantfever'd?
« on: November 05, 2010, 04:29:07 am »
Oh man tell me about it, I gotta find those comments now that you reminded me haha. My best comment battles were with adarqui himself tho lol oh man just ask him about it. But yeah thanks for the love yo, I'm definitely way more chilled, some dude posted a hate comment on my latest vid that was completely untrue, but i just left it whereas I used to reply furiously to like every hate comment. 

I don't have something specific in mind , it was the whole era , from the first 540 video and then all the next vids.
But anyway , its history now , just do your thing and stay chilled.

4483
Basketball / Re: Did we all just get clamantfever'd?
« on: November 04, 2010, 05:27:58 pm »
Yup , that jump , its insanely high , ~42'' or more , legit , word!

DAMN , i just checked his account, he removed all the old vids! That's a real loss to the dunking youtube community!!! :( :( :(

NOT kidding , those vids and comment battles were epic...


lmao tell me about it, i still have those vids too i just made them private lol but i can put them back up if you want. Just curious, who are you and wats ur youtube username? I wonder if you were one of the seemingly hundreds of ppl i used to talk shit to. By the way to everyone here I'm not here to start shit or anything, I know i did a lot of stupid shit when i was younger but i'm different now

Hey clamant,  :welcome:

You can see my youtube link at my singature down here , you know me , we comment each other's vids.

We never talked shit , i am not into that. In the beginning i supported you when everyone dissed you, then i was irritated from your arrogance but that was all. Anyway , thats history , its jsut that those comment fights with UH etc are "cult" , you need to bring the vids back :D

FWIW , I believe ure far different ,  its obvious , youre taking it easy , doing ur thing , not freaking out , you look much more chilled and your jumping and dunking is much more legit now.


4484
4 November 2010

Weight@session : forgot to check  :-\
Injuries/aches: left shoulder bugging , its permanent ( arthritic ) , triggers whenever it likes.
Soreness : none

Upper Body Workout.

BENCH PRESS:
1x8@121
1x8@132
1x8@132
1x6@132 ( -11lbs ), ( +2 reps )

INCLINE BENCH CHEST DB FLYS:
skipped

WIDE GRIP LAT PULLDOWN:
1x8@154
1x8@165 , ( +11lbs )
1x8@176 , ( +11lbs )
1x8@187 , ( +22lbs )

SEATED ROWS:
skipped

SHOULDERS OHP ( Smith machine , slightly incline seat , lowering in front of head , ROM = bar at chin level ):
1x8@99
1x8@110
1x8@121
1x8@132

EZ BAR STANDING BICEP CURLS:
1x12@55
1x12@66
1x12@77

TRICEPS PUSHDOWN ( ROPE ):
1x12@77
1x12@88
1x12@99

4485
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: November 04, 2010, 05:48:19 am »
So how high is the backboard? Looks damn high and you got your forehead there , awesome!  :highfive:

Also , that dude wears a backpack and yet he is so explosive soaring to the rim , WTF ?!?!?!  :o

Pages: 1 ... 297 298 [299] 300 301 ... 341