Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - TKXII

Pages: 1 ... 28 29 [30] 31 32 ... 37
436
I thought that's what you were hinting at; many people mistakenly believe fruit only contains fructose and so is bad post workout because you need glucose. Many fruits contain glucose, in high amounts. Fruit contains a wide variety of sugars not limited to just fructose, sucrose or glucose. Sorbitol, mannitol, ribose, xylitol are just a few other sugars.

http://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/19800383753.html;jsessionid=7239C87A49B3F1B5A6708F76C141720D

 Some fruits contain mostly fructose like apples, and you can easily tell that they fill up your stomach but you stay hungry craving the glucose. So again, if you follow your instincts you can figure out apples post workout is not good for refueling, but one will satiate you. I don't have research but since liver glycogen is depleted from stress there's nothing wrong with an apple or two or three depending on hunger post workout. Probably a great idea for joint health too. (aspirin is based off of acids found abundantly in fruit)

Watermelon is more what I'm thinking of and it has a ton of glucose. Dates, raisins, mangoes, ripe bananas, berries (tend to have more fructose but stil have glucose) will all satiate you. Ripe honeydew melons are fantastic. Fruit is also cooling to the body, and that's important in the summer.


I posted my pictures, I was fatter in that pic than I am now, but then I was drinking milk and fruit, and your insulin hypothesis did not hold up. We're talking at a kindergarten level really, carbs, fat, insulin, all brosciency shit. Once you look at the whole food you see theres a lot more to it than fats carbs proteins and insulin. Raw milk contains short chain fatty acids, and CLA which all burn fat, so raw milk isn't that fattening as long as you on't drink 1/2 gallon at a time, probably not good for your joints or health to take in that much anyway. The reason I recommend eating till you're full on whole foods is that they just don't store as fat as much as things like bread, chips, processed junk, and other empty calories. Starches I forgot to include in my list but brown rice is fine

MJ: I'm not in a caloric deficit ever I eat till i'm full. Not recommending fruitarianism here, but there's another myth that you can't get calories eating fruit.. that's because people's notions of eating fruit is like 1 banana,  or 1 orange, etc. After a workout I cut open a watermelon, and take a spoon, and drain 1/2 of it or more. Then I finish another 1/4 before bed, this is for like a 4 oclock workout. I probably got like 1000 cals form the watermelon.

http://caloriecount.about.com/calories-watermelon-i9326?size_grams=4518.0

If I eat half, that's like a good 6-700 right there.
3 dates could contain 120 cals, so you do the math. I would eat in the past 7-15 after workout with other fruit.

And dieting while squatting is a stupid idea for your HPA axis, for your thyroid, for your testosterone levels, and life in general. Just take short rest periods, get your HR up and you'll burn fat as long as you keep fat low PW get carbs in. I consistently overtrained the past 3 years (not this summer) due to not eating enough and trying to maintain a low weight, and heavy lifting/training. Not good for you for over like a day.


437
So perhaps explain what "you do not agree with" not what is "wrong with this post" because chances are you are "wrong."

I'm not a fan of dieting.

438
It's better to promote a discussion than use the gay emoticons. From my perspective, saying that fruit is bad after a workout really perplexes me, I've never heard that before and could similarly use stupid pictures to express myself but I'd like to understand where these beliefs come from. Sometimes opinions on matters like these are split into certain 'schools' of thought. So explain please

439
Tennis / Re: US open tennis fight
« on: July 26, 2011, 01:39:46 am »
my favorite part were the subtitles regarding the kid's friend. "the kid's friend is getting very uncomfortable at this point."

440
Peer Reviewed Studies Discussion / Re: Vertical Jump
« on: July 26, 2011, 01:20:22 am »
True, but I don't think I can half squat that much..well maybe I can I should try. Yeah they should have really tested vertical jump that would have been cool.

I guess the best extrapolation we can make is that it would probably go up since power increased the most in the 30JS group

441
Nutrition & Supplementation / Re: Eating late at night
« on: July 26, 2011, 12:26:13 am »
I guess we'll get into this discussion again.


NOT FUCKING REALLY.

442
What's your definition of dieting

Also, don't diet. Eat until you're full but eat things like fruit (especially after workout) raw milk, beef after wokrouts, eggs, more fruit, and vegetables. No bread or things that don't give you any energy and you'll notice you won't have to diet

443
Peer Reviewed Studies Discussion / Re: Vertical Jump
« on: July 26, 2011, 12:10:00 am »
Wow I didn't even notice the control group's gains in the 80JS. Maybe they entered their values wrong? THe control group is producing less power than the others at the 80%JS test but jump higher? Wtf..


Anyway here are some of my thoughts. Something to always keep in mind in these sport related studies is the athletic abilities of the participants. We have no data on their training experience or program other than that they play intamural sports. They seem to have high starting strength levels though, if you look at their 1RM, averages are above 300lbs.

So perhaps these participants had been perforing slower weight training already and so more slow weight training as in the 80%1rm jump squats, did not help them in jum performance.

For athletes with lower starting 1RMs, we might have seen a better result from the heavier jump squats. It would also be interesting to see if we took athletes with 40 inch running verticals and tried this protocol on them to compare light fast training to slower and heavier training. The fact that their sprint times decreased is nothing new though. SPrinting is something totally different

Edit: i think most atheltes here would agree with my analysis. But I tend to disagree with this conventional wisdom. I think lighter training may be a better idea. A lot of us really believe in maximal strength training, when the forces in vertical jump aren't near what is seen in maximal strength training. Maximal strength increases will only help one jump higher by increasing their power output in the short time of a ground contact, so a better term is maximal exploive strength expressed in 200 milliseconds or less. Once ai get to a 50 inch vertical I'll talk more though.

444
ADARQ & LanceSTS - Q&A / Re: Sprint deceleration
« on: July 25, 2011, 11:58:55 pm »
It's not the same thing as running backwards but in relation to that article it's probably eccentric/isometric

445
Peer Reviewed Studies Discussion / Re: Vertical Jump
« on: July 25, 2011, 02:47:09 am »
00:21 in the TDUB video is insane. Looks like he has a lot of strength, that's the first time I've seen him jump without his usually 3 step approach.

http://faculty.fullerton.edu/leebrown/PDF%20Files/Academic/McBride-heavy%20vs%20light%20load%20training.pdf

THis study found that jump squats using 30% 1RM were way more effective than at 80% 1RM. They did not test vertical jump, but they tested performance on jump squats using 30, 55, an 80% 1RM using a force plate. THey also tested 20 meter sprint. Problems is that they used a smith machine, and were told to lower the weight in a controlled manner (wold like to see the video), but subjects were instructed to accelerate the bar as fast as possible.
Results:
-1RM increased as expected more in the 80% jump squat group more than the 30%, and relative strength increased as well.
-The 30% JS group increased jump height more than the 80% at all weights tested, that means the 30% jump squat was more effective at increasing jump height in the 80% jump squat even compared to the group that actually trained with 80% jump squats- pretty crazy results.
-Peak force improved more in the 80% JS group in testing post-study, however peak power and peak velocity improve much more in the 30% JS group.

"The JS30 group had
an overall trend of improved velocity capabilities regardless of the load in the jump-squat tests."

Very nice tables to check out in there.
Edit: especially table 3 page 80. Notice the 30js group is producing more power in the 80% 1rm jump squat test than the group that trained with 80%.

446
SquatDr was just used as an example. Obvious troll is obvious.

You have a tiny mental capacity. I could have said athlete X weights 200 lbs and squats 600+. If things are obvious to you you are an i.d.i.o.t.

447
I'd just like to say that my 2 footed one step vert has been responding very well to bounding (max bounding, max height or distance) this summer. I believe it is because it's working my hips more than I traditionally have and my vert in the past was not very hip dominant but is becoming more now.

448
I don't understand why you would have to feel heavier, i think you would feel lighter, especially if CNS firing improves

If you suddenly lose mass, then yeah.

So what do you think about the Squat Dr. guy, 200 lbs squatting 600+, while still developing forces at a high rate (he sprinted as well and reported fast times, believing it or not is another thing). His body seriously thinks he is "heavy" when he is developing such forces? Of course there are countless other examples of people like this, such as many football players, sprinters (maurice greene, chambers (who has a huge vert, huge squat, and a lot of muscle mass).

If I move to Jupiter for 3 months, then come back here, I should feel lighter, not heavier despite gains in muscle mass. If I go on a spaceship flight to the moon, and lose bone/muscle mass, i will be lighter, but feel heavier.

If I jump around on a trampoline for a while, I feel heavier even though I perceived myself to be lighter while on the trampoline. After a set of 3 of squat jumps, I feel lighter, despite feeling heavier with a lot of weight on my back.

Which systems coordinate these 'feelings' is my real question.

I see the analogy of higher muscle mass compared to an engine, but it seems like you're comparing the CNS to that engine with is not analogous, it should be the heart you're talking about, and the CNS the driver of the car. If your strength, especially explosive strength keeps increasing, how can the muscle mass be considered a burden? Furthermore if we are performing explosive strength training the tendons are hypertrophying as well and this results in further strength gains so the discussino should not just include muscle.


449
I use my sofa. You can do a GHR too, but if your sofa is not heavy enough it doesn't work. So I do single legged partial GHRs with the sofa, more of an isometric deal though

450
ADARQ & LanceSTS - Q&A / Re: Sprint deceleration
« on: July 24, 2011, 10:57:06 pm »
Nice man, glad you liked it.


I tried the rapid deceleration today and I felt a burn in my quads, even though I think I decelerated more quiclky than i ever have before. I'm definitely gonna keep it up although I may need more recovery time.


On a serious note, I've always been a risky person attempting, or at least thinking about attempting dangerous things. Also I'd like evidence that this shit is actually bad for your knees, and bending them past say 90degrees is also bad. Also if you look more closely at my first drop jump, I shift my momentum forward very quickly so the load isn't on my knees as much as it seems since I push forward with hips.

Also the goal is not to crush the ball in the eccentric pistol squats. It is simply to train the nervous system to handle large loads, and overload the movement eccentrically. The ball is a form of cheating since you use it's momentum but you will still generate more tensino than you would in a box single legged squat since the weights you use are much greater. I don't even do these anymore though. It should be a box squat on one leg on a swiss ball.

Pages: 1 ... 28 29 [30] 31 32 ... 37