Adarq.org

Quote from: dirksilver on March 31, 2011, 02:51:58 pm

Quote from: JC on March 31, 2011, 12:53:56 pm

Quote from: ARowe on March 30, 2011, 09:07:20 pm

philray is natty. He has progress pics of himself since he started lifting... looks natty, no huge jumps. He's also the oldest and has been working out the longest.

Babo claims he's natty. Skeptical though because he blew up just like zyzz/chestbrah in the same time period and they are open about using gear. Babo says his grandpa or something was some successful bodybuilder or something though so he claims he has very good genetics.

Manlets ftw

None of them are natty. And all of them "look natty". None of them have impressive physiques that you couldn't get naturally.

can we have a rule on this forum to never use the term "natty" again? just such a bro douche bag thing to say

x2

That's because your associating it with a favorite of bros everywhere, natty ice and natty light.

I ate chicken. Am I roided? Should I give up on sports?

I know, no and yes.

Chicken isn't made in laboratories

inb4 dem hormones in chicken

Remember Rashard Lewis?

DHEA. Not even a PED in real world sense of the word.

Quote from: JC on March 29, 2011, 10:42:20 pm

If they are saying you are 5-8% year round, that's enough to know they are inaccurate. Pro bodybuilders can't even stay 5% year round on tons of drugs.

Come on man, your comparing my lifestyle to the caloric intake/training of a bodybuilder.

Seriously now.

I guess the drugs can't negate the effects of massive caloric consumption/too small amount of cardio activity.

Weren't you blabbing about calories in/calories out before? Now cardio matters?

Quote from: DamienZ on March 29, 2011, 07:17:43 pm

What height/weight? And are those 5-8% internet-bodyfat or real bodyfat?

6' 0", around 160 lbs. I use body fat calipers to test.

Building for power.

I bet you're higher than 10%

the more extreme you want your results to be (according to your body/genetics) the more the "keep it healthy and basic" does not get the job done..

Not necessarily

Calories in, calories out.

Its not rocket science, it's the most simple thing on earth.


"At 325 pages and containing over 600 scientific references", lol.

He's just blagging peoples heads with irrelevant info.

You have no idea what the keto diet is. Calories in, calories out is true for total weight loss, but if you want to retain muscle without anabolic assistance, it's a little more advanced than that.

http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/improve_basketball_speed.htm

http://www.t-nation.com/free_online_program/sports_body_training_muscle_anaconda/anaconda_protocol#i-bodybuilder-program/guidelines