361
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: The right and wrong way to squat
« on: December 18, 2011, 11:19:52 pm »
Nobody is focusing on the argument, how intelligent we are.
I made a revision to my argument; if you are squatting significantly below parallel, then it is good for thehips to go back, but above parallel, it is not since the quads become more involved.
And actually here is a more recent training video of mine:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_yOYQ1358c
My DL max has gone up around 100lbs in less than 2.5mos. I hit 425 a couple weeks ago pretty easily. Going for 3xbw.
Yes kingfish I like front squats, it's hard to lean forward but the same thing does apply. Your pelvis really should not be moving backwards once above parallel. Squatting to just below or exactly at parallel is definitely better for power development in the long run imo since the amortization is challenging the correct musculature in the correct way. In atg squats the amortization and muscle involvement is way different. I notice how atg or below parallel is almost easier than just parallel, or half-squats with the same weight, adarq talked about that before.
Edit: I'd like to congratulate Kingfish actually, good job. Squat form is heel-to-toe and you can see the difference in his knees, they don't move so much in the horizontal plane compared to the toe-to-heel squats, and the hips move forward above parallel. That's what I'm talking about. It feels better and works better.
I made a revision to my argument; if you are squatting significantly below parallel, then it is good for thehips to go back, but above parallel, it is not since the quads become more involved.
And actually here is a more recent training video of mine:
My DL max has gone up around 100lbs in less than 2.5mos. I hit 425 a couple weeks ago pretty easily. Going for 3xbw.
Yes kingfish I like front squats, it's hard to lean forward but the same thing does apply. Your pelvis really should not be moving backwards once above parallel. Squatting to just below or exactly at parallel is definitely better for power development in the long run imo since the amortization is challenging the correct musculature in the correct way. In atg squats the amortization and muscle involvement is way different. I notice how atg or below parallel is almost easier than just parallel, or half-squats with the same weight, adarq talked about that before.
Edit: I'd like to congratulate Kingfish actually, good job. Squat form is heel-to-toe and you can see the difference in his knees, they don't move so much in the horizontal plane compared to the toe-to-heel squats, and the hips move forward above parallel. That's what I'm talking about. It feels better and works better.