He obviously has good genetics for the SVJ. I understand your point though, but I was merely complementing him--not putting myself down in any way.
IMO what seems like a complement is backhanded belittling. Complementing someone while mentioning their genetics is implicitly suggesting that their results are less a result of their training/hardwork and attributing it to their genetic advantage. As a mixed-race track and field athlete I heard this all the time... I would run a fast time, people would be impressed, and then ask "what are you?". I cannot tell you the amount of crestfallen white people who would say "oh.... ok well impressive but THATS why". This defeatist idea of racial speed superiority is IMO why almost every fast white american sprinter I have come across is a natural - because if they were not fast to begin with racial stereotypes got in the way of their self-belief to develop speed...
I am a geneticist. It's what I do. I am not claiming that genetic variation doesn't play a part in our performance - but I am saying that suggesting that we have absolutely no way of knowing the component it plays in any individual and it's a waste of time to make such claims.
I was not belittling my own genetics, but clearly having a 40" SVJ is something most people cannot accomplish through hard work.
Sorry, I'm not going to agree with something that you state "clearly" but have absolutely no way of knowing. Consider what kingfish has done and consider what evidence you have for your claim. When I see a longitudinal study that takes a large group of healthy 25 year old men and subjects them to almost daily heavy pause squatting, an almost flawless diet, daily heavy back extensions, mobility work, and positive belief that it is possible (basically the kingfish protocol) for five years and tests their vertical THEN we can make claims about whether or not a 40'' SVJ is something most people cannot accomplish through hard work. Until then we do not know whether this statement is true. CLEARLY a 40'' SVJ is something that
some people cannot accomplish through hard work. The question is how large is this group? If we take 100 subjects will 20 of them accomplish it? Will 40? 60? I do not know and neither do you. I will admit that because I train athletes and believe that the mind and belief are an extremely large component of your performance ceiling that if I had to guess how many athletes could achieve it I personally would err on the side of overestimating the percentage of people, but in truth we don't know and such a study is not likely to happen...
The study isn't likely to happen because it takes an extreme amount of work and dedication and it's a lot to ask of people. In fact it's quite clear that KF's biggest advantage over the average trainee is not his genetics but his lifestyle. He is lucky to have a job which has a gym and a squat rack and a schedule that affords him the ability to squat daily and be as focused as he has been. He is lucky to earn enough money to satisfy his nutritional needs and not have to travel often for work so he can be focused. Of course he still has to put in a ton of work. And for that he deserves a lot of praise.
Really, for you the only question is what can you achieve if you put in the work? Maybe only 5 out of 100 men would get a 40'' SVJ after 5 years of dedicated training... Maybe 70 out of 100 would... But all that matters is whether you are in that group of 5 or 70. I don't know the size of the group or whether you are in the group that can achieve it. BUT what I do believe is that even if you are not - the belief that you may be is paramount to your success - and it's not binary - failure has a few levels. Maybe you believe 100% that a 40'' vertical is within your capabilities and put in the work that KF has. Maybe your wrong and after five years you top out at 37'' or 38.5'' in the SVJ. But that's not to shabby now is it? But a not to shabby failure will only happen with the positive belief that you can achieve much more. That's my two cents.