3391
ADARQ & LanceSTS - Q&A / Re: Age vs Vertical :: various Q&A ( programming , exercise form etc )
« on: November 01, 2012, 10:11:25 am »
^Thanks , that covers this part of my query:
But if i wanted to take the other way and attempt a recomposition staying at the same weight , would the way i set it up be correct?
Or there does not really exist such a thing as a steady-weight recomposition?
I am insisting because I pulled that mixed bulk/cut plan right out of my ass so i need to know if it has any proven/studied base or i should dump it and go typical bulk/cut cycles.
Is my approach valid? Would it be better if i took an approach of first plain cut and then plain bulk, or it wouldn't really make a difference?
But if i wanted to take the other way and attempt a recomposition staying at the same weight , would the way i set it up be correct?
Or there does not really exist such a thing as a steady-weight recomposition?
I am insisting because I pulled that mixed bulk/cut plan right out of my ass so i need to know if it has any proven/studied base or i should dump it and go typical bulk/cut cycles.