301
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: chasing athleticism
« on: August 20, 2012, 03:41:33 pm »Here's my argument for (F)SQ over BS
Have only been doing SQ for a short time but already
1. SQ is quickly catching up to BS, last wk I did 105x3 on SQ vs 110x2 on BS - very little to differentiate them
2. SQ form is better than BS form
3. progress in BS comes at the cost of form - squatmornings happen because legs are weak and back is much stronger, lighter backsquats do nothing for legs, and heavier backsquats are too much for legs and eaten up greedily for breakfast by much stronger back
4. SQ is remedial for squatmorning BS pattern - it fixes that and it teaches uprightness which will carry over to BS, in fact already has to some degree
fwiw, youre not nearly the only one thats come to this conclusion. As long as youre keeping balance in your legs with the hams and quads, go for it.