Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - T0ddday

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 58
31
Shoes / Re: A shoe specifically for dunking
« on: September 04, 2016, 03:17:41 pm »
in my exp. the shoe weight makes no difference lol. unless you were wearing something as heavy as hiking boots thats when it counts, but all ball shoes weigh about the same, i guess the only difference is the placebo a light shoe would give you lol.

i'm weak af. when i put on my hyperdunks, i walk around for like 2 seconds, then i take them off. they feel horrible.

shoe weight definitely makes a difference for me.. it could all be mental, but that's still significant. All I know is I wouldn't want to run/sprint/"do plyometrics" in basketball shoes.. i'd rather do that in XC flats.. so if i'd rather "fly" in XC flats, why would I ever want to wear basketball shoes? ... especially since I don't actually play basketball anymore.

so that's why I have this problem with basketball shoes.. they have all of this extra support/protection/weight for playing basketball, which I don't play. If someone made a ~4-5 oz XC flat style shoe but, with a stronger sole for jumping, I think i'd be in heaven.

the lightest shoes I have right now are my NB 5000 v2 running shoes .. which I enjoyed jumping in until I hurt my heel. I kind of think jumping in those shoes was more risky than my XC flats because even thoug they have more heel protection (for running), it's this hard foam-like substance that I think shifted when I planted in my SLRVJ.. which caused some kind of damage to my "heel area'. Now it flares up slightly on occasion when jumping in my XC flats - but never to the initial extent when I injured it in my NB 5000 v2's. My XC flats are more like ~5 oz and have a strong rubber on the bottom, instead of that weird space-age foam material. I think it offers more protection.

I should have designed myself a damn shoe .. i'll do that in the future.  :headbang: :ibrunning: :ibjumping:

I want one shoe I can run, sprint, jump, and dunk in.. :D

Get puma biowebs.

My problem w true flats is that while I jump higher... I'm also shorter.  I'm 5'11 in flats and 6'1 in bball shoes... I jump moderately higher in flats (especially single leg and running jumps) but for drop step dunks I think it's kinda a stalemate... Jump an inch higher or be an inch taller?  What's best?

The ultimate shoe for jumping is a negative heel shoe.  Studies show this is by far the best thing.  Hard to find.  You can however make your own inserts w duct tape and insoles and it can be dramatic.  About half an inch higher at the toe that the heel and you will fly. 

32
Shoes / Re: A shoe specifically for dunking
« on: September 04, 2016, 03:14:44 pm »
Prob important when you're at the cusp of breaking into new territory. Maybe landing your first dunk or windmill or whtaever. But in my experience, there is a difference in where the weight is. Ive done weighted dunks at ~220lb while weighing ~165lb. But if i put on some ankle weights (around 3kg i think), it changes things a lot more than the weight vest did. It's hard to explain though unless you try it out. I think you do want your feet to be as light as possible.

First of all...

That's impressive as fuck. 

Doing 220lb dunks at 160 is ridiculous.  I don't know how many inches a dunk is for you but if I assume you need a 30 inch jump to dunk... Then taking off the weight should give you a 41 inch jump... How far is this from truth?

As far as where the weight is... Your totally right, I don't like ankle weights for this reason.  However any added weight should give a minimum boost of weight_vest/bw * weighted jump.  That's where I get the 41 inch jump from.  This is the least you should gain though... Weight hurts in different places besides this.  If your not getting this gain when you take the weight off you need to do "over speed" work.  Basically what sprinters do when we tow them.  Harder to set up for a jump but possible w bands.  Basically you need to work on producing them same force for a "lighter" (accelerating body).

IMO the most challenging weights are thigh weights.  Weight there just kills the jump. 

33
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: FP's log
« on: September 01, 2016, 09:26:35 am »
C2 rower intervals?

Yes.  A million times over biking.  Biking shortens the hamstrings and will have short term negative affects on your sprint speed.  And it doesn't really rest it...  And rollerblading just looks lame...

 I know you play frisbee and I know a lot of people might clown you for that - but after I got over the annoying white flight aspect of frisbee I accepted that there are some plays that are look absolutely ridiculously cool...  Rollerblading can be very impressive.  But it's never cool.

34
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Two Hands Two Feet
« on: September 01, 2016, 09:21:52 am »
^^^ The sad thing is that while I don't blame Bolt he probably just reversed the stereotype such that every 5'6"  would be Trindon Holiday lookalike will now be doubted when they try to run the hundred because they just aren't tall enough...

I mean I get its human nature but the medias need to have things be obviously and simple is really part of the problem... The two most frustrating new stereotypes Bolt has created are:

1) Hes a poor starter cause his he is so tall.

2) His advantage is his long legs. 

Both totally false. 

1) He has the fastest recorded 30m, 40m, 50m, etc. Of all time (2009).  He may appear to be a poor starter because of the stupid automatic dq after false start rule... Since it bit him in 2011 Bolt has decided to be extremely cautious - I mean why risk any chance of a false start when you can win without a good start...  The new rule just ensures that faster people will "have" poor reaction times simply because the faster you are the more the risk reward ratio increases...

2) Bolt is fast because he has far more power than anyone else.  At high speeds our stride is hardly limited by our leg length - in fact he performs worse in the one part of the sprint where long legs provide the biggest advantage - the back straight in the 200m.  After already accelerating around the turn and fatigue setting in longer legs can start to make a minor difference in this part of the race (just watch Christophe Lemetrie long leg (his are longer than Bolt btw) his way to a bronze in rio)... Does Bolt have a great back 100?  No.  Yohan Blayke has run the fastest split of all time in the back stretch.  Number two is still Michael Johnson.  Bolt owns the record in the first hundred.  By a ridiculous margin.  He runs a faster turn than anyone else!  The turn! The part of the race where long legs don't provide a disadvantage if anything!  He is just simply more powerful than anyone else.

Maybe stereotypes get created partially cause we need to explain away others greatness because of our own ego?

Maybe it's just hard to say Bolt is simply the most powerful sprinter ever and I'm in awe of how much faster he is than me so instead I say "yeah he fast cause he has a huge advantage on me cause of his long legs".

Fine.  Maybe we need this.  I get it.  But let's just agree to make our excuses based on reasons that are illogical enough that they won't stick.  Bolt is faster than me cause he has access to magical yams.

35
Shoes / Re: A shoe specifically for dunking
« on: August 31, 2016, 01:47:56 pm »
I'm actually pretty happy with my Kobe's they're not heavy at all and lowtop, comparable to my running shoes .. the only problem is, and this is a deal breaker ... is that they're not flexible on the top so i dont get much dorsiflexion (?). if i can find a pair of shoes that have that as well i'll be super happy for a dunking shoe (and general basketball).

i've never had kobe's.. and i'm still tempted. I think I need to get a stronger shoe for MAX EFFORT slrvj... i can submax in my flats but, max effort, might be risking it a bit.. I just don't want to F up my heel.

pc!

Neither, it's my first pair and i normally wudnt get a name shoe, just dont care about that stuff. KDs stuff looked good to me but i cant be bothered paying the premium for a name. Anyway about the Kobes, i didn't get the highend pair Kobe 12 or whatever they're up to now. But i do wanna know if theyre better in the regard of flexibility up top. Lemme know if you find a good pair - i think Kobe's are close if only for the inflexibilty up top.

I jump in Puma biowebs.  I had a deal with them where I got them for nothing and I have 30 pairs.  They are in all my dunk videos.  Highly recommended.

36
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Two Hands Two Feet
« on: August 30, 2016, 11:53:43 pm »

Yeah that's the beauty of using a belt. And it purportedly makes your abs bigger too. It's a panacea for some. I have an article on the training board about a study showing the use of a belt allows you to train your legs better!

ahahahahahahahahahahahaha no.

^ya, abs contract harder, that's the claim

LBSS, standard dogma says it gives your abs something to push against and this works them harder. IDK, dont have a horse in this race, dont use a belt but that;s what they claim.

I have heard this but the way it was explained to me was the belt gives your abs something to push against which gives you immediate feedback and the ability to brace your core better. Not sure how this plays as far as making them bigger/stronger though.


Lol.  This is funny.  This is one of the half truths that has morphed into some myth.  Physical pressure on a muscle increases activation.  Best example I can think to explain activation is bench press.  Take a kid who has never bench pressed.  Ask him to flex his pecs and he will wiggle his shoulders.  Now get him to bench press for a year.  Ask him to flex his chest and his chest muscles will contract visibly.  Is this proof that he is stronger.  No.  This is an improvement in muscle activation (given that he was a beginner and started benching he is most likely stronger even if the gains are mediated through neuromuscular activation rather than actual tissue adaption) but the point is improvement in activation does not equal strength.

Also, consider the kid after he has only been benching for 2 months.  Ask him to flex his pecs.  Maybe one side his chest moves slightly but he isn't all the way there yet.  Now take your index finger and press firmly against his pec.  Ask him to flex.  He will be shocked at the contraction. 

Your sensory cells (specifically pressure receptors) turn on in response to pressure and send a signal to the brain.  While this signal is being sent we get a multiplicative effect of signals sent back toward the muscle.   This IS useful.  This is why coaches should put their hand on athletes and good coaches use this trick a lot - putting your hands on someones hipflexors during a march get them to actually fire - I have had athletes that are try to do a straight leg pull back and don't figure out how to use the hamstring to initiate it until I press on it. 

So back to the argument at hand.  Will a tight belt increase abdominal activation slightly?  Maybe.  If you didn't have the coordination to activate your abs this might help...   But your trying to jump high without a belt.  The goal is to learn to coordinate your abs and contract them without pressure - a belt can be  a teaching tool - but it's not going to make your abs bigger!  In fact if anything it is a crutch that you will rely on and you won't learn to contract your abs without pressure any more.   

So, yes pressure applied to a muscle does increase activation.  Great trick to learn  how to activate muscles.  Pressure and bands are great in every toolbox for this reason.  But neither is very good for making muscles bigger.

37
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Two Hands Two Feet
« on: August 30, 2016, 07:21:51 pm »
This quick point is related to T0ddday's post about dads, stereotypes, culture etc..

If we are subjected to those stereotypes as we grow up, there's a good chance we will believe them. And by simply believing them, it goes from being a stereotype to a "physical barrier" in our brains. I think our brains are full of those barriers, in all kinds of different forms - not just athletics. So if all of a sudden we want to "defy our genetics", which might actually just be - realize our true genetic potential, we have to destroy such barriers in our brains as we attempt to progress. I've been guilty of it myself by saying "defying my genetics". I try not to mention "whiteness" as being a limitation, though it is somewhat implied when I say defying my genetics. As a coach, I would make sure not to use such stereotypes in front of kids/athletes, and also make sure to call out athletes or their parents for using these stereotypes etc.

TLDR: stereotypes become physical barriers in our brains if we end up believing them. I'm not a neuroscientist, but I imagine an "inefficient series of dendrites" and such that weaken the "go get it" signal.

As for myself, I often think about my brain being a limiting factor: especially for running. For jumping/sprinting, I often tell my brain to "let go" and "give me more". Maybe i'm just nuts, but I really feel like my brain holds me back more than my muscle/tendon physiology. One reason I think this is, when i'm feeling REALLY GOOD MENTALLY, I can get much more out of my jump/sprint/run sessions. If I let any self doubt creep in, the quality of jumps/sprints/runs decrease dramatically (sprints less so, jumps/running more so). So I kind of feel like i'm in a battle with not only the physiological factors related to muscle/tendon/nervous system, but also with my brain. I feel like there's things in there "blocking me" from turning it up a notch ... perhaps protective mechanisms given my current fitness/strength etc. I mentioned a "governor device for engines" in a previous post... that's kind of what it feels like.. how to remove the governor and inject the NOS???  :ninja:

I'm finding that more and more difficult with my own kids.  I had never really thought about the impact of stereotypes because I try not to use them but when your kids ask you a question related to it you really have to think and be careful about not giving the easy answer. Also, it's very hard to control what teachers, coaches and other students and parents are saying because that's where a lot of stereotypes can stem from. Nearly all of it unintentional too.

Yeah I mean this is a really complicated issue especially when dealing w kids.  It's basically that we have to balance three things - barriers, stereotypes and realistic expectations/limits.

I think the barriers that Andrew talks about are totally real and their is a bunch evidence to support how damaging they are... Just think about Roger Bannister and the four minute mile.  Before he ran it people just were so sure it couldn't be done...  Then he went out and did it only training 3 hrs a week (he had limited time due to his schedule as a medical student and only did 400m speed repeats on his lunch break)... Within 10 years highschool kids had done it and somebody had run a sub 8 minute 2 mile!  He broke through the barrier for everyone and then it no longer had power over people and now it's not looked at as an amazing thing at all!  These barriers really hold us back from make individual progress or progress as a society or human race!  I hate when people have political ideas and people say things like "well a world without war is unrealistic cause humans are naturally violent war loving creatures"... It's like yeah maybe... But for sure if you keep saying that!!!

As far as stereotypes about race go they are mostly harmful if they involve any trainable quality...  There are a fun non harmful ones - over here we have a stereotype that Samoan people are generally really nice guys.  I don't see much harm in that - people expecting others to be nice is a good thing (we are far too fearful of others due to shows like CSI that make people think the world is full of psychotic killers) and if Samoans are effected by the stereotype and be nice rather than mean - well I don't really see much harm in that!  What's important to realize is that stereotypes can be harmful without being explicitly negative.  People don't see the harm in the stereotype that black people run faster or Asians or good at math cause they don't understand how it effects others. It's harmful for members of the race that the stereotype is about because of the pressure it puts on them.  In the case of math - the stories about Asian students committing suicide at MiT because of the immense pressure is an obvious reason why it is bad.  Or the fact that a black athlete who isn't fast will get branded as a lazy person who won't work hard while a semi fast white athlete gets praised as being extremely hard working!  That's wrong and damaging to everyone!  And then of course there is the contradiction that people are using empirical data as justification for believing some positive things like being good at math or running fast but claiming to not believe it at all for negative things.  I am always like "wait you think it's completely clear that whites are slow and blacks are fast cause a black guy won the 100m but you don't think poor test scores indicate that black people are not as smart?" Hmm.. I don't believe you, I think you think there is truth to both but you just don't want to admit one of them!" 

The problem though is that if we ignore stereotypes and limits completely and tell kids to do this we risk giving people unrealistic expectations.  This balance is so challenging.  I don't want white kids to believe that they can't run fast but at the same time I don't want any kids telling themselves that they don't need to do their homework because they have no natural limit and if they train they will be the fastest man in the world! 

Balancing this is hard.  They way I try and do it is emphasize that we do have limits - both genetically and lifestyle imposed.  However you don't know what the limits are until you work hard at something... The harder you work the closer you get to figuring being able to get a handle on limits and when you do get some idea of what your limiting characteristics are you shouldn't necessarily just ignore them because your filled with self confidence that barriers are always bad! 

In fact, part of the cruel irony of this is that while believing in your limitations and barriers can keep you from reaching your potential - so to can completely ignoring them...  One of the greatest examples of this is Andrew himself!  Think about Andrew's accomplishments and how he reached them.  He tried to get strong and jump high.  He read and researched and realized that he was limited in using the full squat to build his strength for his vertical - he recognized that limit and ignored dogma and half squatted and quad jumped his way to become a white guy jumping almost 40'' inches and blasting through barriers and making dunk videos.   Getting near 40'' is an accomplishment.  He power jumped his way to doing a DLRVJ that was damn near elite level through hard work.  Could he have got to 42?  45?  50?  Who knows.  But along the way he realized some limitations (or a better way to phrase it might be some areas where he was less advantaged rather than more) and is now embarking on reaching the elite 40/40 dunking club.  But he realized that he might be limited in how far he can progress jumping with a power two footed jump and realized that his best strength might not be carrying the mass and muscle necessary to jump like this and accumulate injuries - so he is switching to jump off one leg.  This is achieved only by working hard and being realistic and knowledgeable about ones strengths.  In the beginning there is no need to consider limits - he kept gaining cause he kept improving...  without self-belief that he could jump he never would have made these gains... But at some point blind self belief that he can achieve his goals however he wants if he works hard could keep his focus on two footed jumping exclusively and he wouldn't be able to jump as high in the long run...  This is why you have to be realistic with your body and know where you excel.  It's also why you should have a general goal (like dunking or running fast) rather than a specific goal like running an incredible 200m or jumping high via squatting and two footed jumping only...

I had a track teammate who would dominate in practice and usually beat me in the 200m.  The guy only wanted to run the 100m though. He was full of self confidence and in someways it served him well.  He believed so strongly that if he worked hard (and he was the hardest worker) he would be great. He insisted he was a 100m guy but in meets would always near 11 and only broke 11 one time.  He was full of excuses and mad that he dominated us in practice where we were fatigued and couldn't bring it in competition.  FINALLY, his last year he ran the 400m with little training and ran 46.1.   The were so many signs that he would excel at the 400m but he refused to do it because he ignored his "limits" or strengths and had to specific of a goal.  If he just wanted to be fast he could have probably achieved so much***.

*** Just to illustrate how hard this can be it's important to consider who should make the switch or make a training change.  It should only be you or someone you know extremely well...  This is why it's so important to be mindful and aware of your training, your strengths, what works for you, etc.  You have to balance patience with your coaches training and progress and work extremely hard while also being aware of what specifically works best for you... I have seen this happen countless times - a young sprinter comes to college after he had a good career in highschool running fast times in the 100, 200 and 400.  Perhaps he runs 10.9 off of highschool training that includes cross country, basketball, and some poor track work.  He hasn't lifted at all or done any real speed work.  If he is lanky and white the coach will take him after the first day and use stereotypes to make the decision that he is a 400m or even 800m guy and force him to do an event where he never excels simply because the coach imposed a racist limit on him rather than give him the speed work and strength training that could have made him into a great sprinter...  I truly believe that if someone like Christophe Lemeitre had grown up in the US he wouldn't be the first white guy to go sub10 because some idiot college coach would have forced him to run the 800m.  If the athlete isn't aware he won't put up a fight when someone imposes limits based on stereotypes or limited data and it will cost him his ability to succeed...

We can look no further for an example than Usain Bolt.  There is some terrible myth that Usain is lazy - but the truth is that it's just a myth - the guy pukes at practice daily.  His coach used stereotypes (that he is tall) to decide he could only be successful in the 400m and maybe the 200m despite the fact that he ran an out of shape explosive 200m in 20.5 as a 15 year old...  Bolt struggled at the longer distances and gave it a shot but at some point he knew his body and his ability well enough to ask/beg his coach for the chance to run the 100m....  His coach allowed him to and the rest is history...

TL;DR - Racial stereotypes suck.  Stereotypes that involve achieving something that takes hard work are terrible for everyone.  Ignore them and believe in yourself and know that you can do anything - but in the back of your mind be mindful that you might not be able to do ANYTHING but that you surely won't achieve it if you don't believe it...  As you evolve as an athlete don't let limits and barriers effect you BUT be mindful of where you might be more successful if it is a change in technique, training, strategy or even and keep your goals general enough so that you are afforded the flexibility to achieve them in whichever way works best for you...  In short, it's kind of like religion or faith in god.  Love sport and athletics and believe that you can succeed and be great - but realize that (god) success works in mysterious ways - you will get your goal if you believe in yourself but it might not be how you envisioned it or exactly the same goal you had when you started out!

38
the high temp in DC today was 96, the high humidity was 88%. currently it's 4:30, 94 degrees and 39% humidity.

i do seriously think about moving to LA or somewhere else when i come back from pakistan.

Well.... The only positive is you do run faster and jump longer in a humid climate... So there is that... But beyond the weather Los Angeles is one of the most pleasant cities in the country... None of that east coast old money racism, less nepotism, everything except driving...  But it is now possible to live in DTLA without a car which I have been successfully pulling off since I totaled mine...

39
Try 35'C + 70% humidity, it's a nightmare, all you want to/can do is hide indoors with A/C at full blast!

otherwise known as a typical summer day in washington, dc.

srsly, maybe I should think twice before going to the states.

Sounds like a day that never happens in California.  The us is big.

40
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: FP's log
« on: August 29, 2016, 04:33:19 am »
Season is over. We were seeded 9th and got 6th, top 5 teams are going to regionals. We had our whole team together for the first time in a while so I played starting D-line and only a few O-line points. I played mostly shutdown defense, wasn't able to get too many poaches cause i was usually covering the best cutter. 0 layouts, 0 true D's. I didn't get beat deep at all but I gave up short unders occasionally, twice i got beat up the line: this is a sign that either my footwork is bad or that I don't accelerate fast enough, both problems I need to address. I know I played good.. Just wish the captain let me play O-line I could have contributed a lot. I got a few tips on run-through D attempts and 3 touches on pointblock attempts. Got lots of goals.

Anaerobic Endurance wasn't a problem at all because I only played about half the D points (long rests between points) and there were no marathon points. I was slow though: not explosive at all. I really should have done more short sprints during the last 2 weeks, 5 interval sessions at submax speed with not a whole lot of speed work to balance the fiber counts was poor planning.

Gonna start thorough GPP asap, all hamstring stuff on hold cause I'm almost positive my hamstring pain is tendinitis. I thought it might be DOMS but it's only in 1 leg and only bothers me directly after intensive running (but not 24-48 hours later like doms). It's a very dull and achy pain. Similar symptoms to groin tendinitis. After I get my hamstring problem sorted out I wanna do 1:1 weight room GPP: speed/power session. I have 6 months of offeason to train for spring.

Eventually going to write out a more detailed plan.

I dunno about frisbee but in football when I have a corner who never gets beat deep and keeps giving up plays underneath or in the flat... It's not athleticism but it's just poor strategy...  Is frisbee not the same?  In football I try to remind players that you want to get beat deep 0.99 times per game - if that makes sense...

41
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: August 28, 2016, 11:11:54 am »
As for sprinting goals, my #1 goal is to simply hit 20 mph on my watch. 18.4 mph felt crazy fast....... I love how that felt. I'd love to "feel" 20mph.

Man that's already fast compared to me. I had a max speed of 26.6 km/h (16.52 mph). Only need to get to 27.8 mph to match Usain (and keep it for that distance  :o)

when did usain hit 27.8 mph? ~70m?

i honestly think the watch will help immediately, somewhat. once I saw my max speed on it, it became almost like a vertec. Obviously we can do the same with timed sprints etc, but that measures the entire run; that's one reason I also like flying sprints.

So far, I personally like using the watch "as a vertec", simply trying to build up to max speed .. then checking all of the 'spikes' when I get home, to see if I PR'd anything. It would be nice to see that data as i'm doing it, but I don't like running/sprinting with a phone. So the only thing I could do is put the watch on the screen that shows "current pace", which is pretty nice.. but just too hard to check when you're sprinting max speed. That screen is absolutely great for submax runs.

Also since I mostly run on the sidewalks etc, a GPS watch is such a great tool

Usain can hit and hold 27 mph the entire race after 50m.  I posted this somewhere else but the deceleration portion of the 100m is pretty much a myth.  Good sprinters reach top speed at about 50-60m (women a little later) and they hold this speed the rest of the race. 

As far as the watch... First of all what is it?

Second... I agree that it could be an amazing training tool just like a vertec... But I just don't trust gps.  I tried using GPS on the track and 100m is like 101-107 meters... So I don't know how accurate the speed is for a 150m sprint... Is that how the watch works?   Or does it have an acceleromter and some fancy hardware.... I mean it should be possible to get it accurate but the gps apps on phones are really no good for sprinting...

But yeah like a vertec feedback is important... It's why I use the old school technique for sprint speed feedback of running with someone else...  Still not perfect though... I saw a thing about some training center where they had a little train track mounted robot that supposedly moved along the track exactly like you... So you could race 100m, then set the tool, then continue to race against your "shadow" from that rep!  Like racing for time in mariokart... That would be amazing...

42
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: August 28, 2016, 05:35:57 am »
As for sprinting goals, my #1 goal is to simply hit 20 mph on my watch. 18.4 mph felt crazy fast....... I love how that felt. I'd love to "feel" 20mph.

Man that's already fast compared to me. I had a max speed of 26.6 km/h (16.52 mph). Only need to get to 27.8 mph to match Usain (and keep it for that distance  :o)

To be fair... Using a watch like this will probably underestimate times... A 26 km/hr sprint is about 7 m/s... Your true instantaneous velocity is probably higher... That's a 10 second 70m without the start... So if you go sub 9 in the sixty your faster than this...

Closer to usain but still not close to usain...

43
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Two Hands Two Feet
« on: August 27, 2016, 03:45:29 pm »
26/08/2016 - 1pm

Track Day
3xstrides
SL Supine Bridge  x 10
Knee to Elbow Walking Lunge x 10
Knee to rear foot walking Lunge x10
Walking Spiderman x 10
Rev Walking Lunge with posterolateral Reach x10
straight Leg skip
Rudiment Hops (all legs)
DL hops (3x10)
L/R leg bounds (2x5)
Alt leg bounds (2x10)
Speed Bounds
5x20m sprint   
3x40m sprint   
3xflying 30m sprint
2x60m sprint
2x3x100m sprint

Back to the track for the first time in weeks. Bloody thing was being used by school kids again so I was relegated to the soccer field next door. All things being equal I didn't do too bad. Have some footage of bounds which I may upload if I can get over my embarrassment. 2x3x100s were brutal as I didn't take too much rest between. No real point till I get fitter anyway. All in all felt good though.

Edit- Just looking at footage and I look so damn slow. It's ridiculous. I think I'm going to change my name to Glacier. I'm white and slow as fuck!  ;D

Lol.  Got no problem with you making fun of your whiteness or slowness... But if u make a nickname that sounds like two go together then you will be suggesting that racist and ruining athletics in America so stick to one!

Lol can't tell if serious or not.

I'm not sure how it could be racist though. I'm white which is a fact and I'm also slow which is a fact. It's also self imposed which is more self deprecating than racist imo.

Half joking...

Noticing that your slow isn't racist...
Noticing that your white isn't racist...
Getting a nickname that combines those isn't racist...

The belief that both of those traits occur together because of some innate relationship is racist! 

And it is frustrating because I deal with it a lot.  I got a chance to train a basketball prodigy recently... Was humbling how good this kid was.  White kid.  6'3" 140 pounds.  Amazing jumper, hesitation, dribbling, smart little moves with his hands, sneaking push offs and pull backs... Amazing.  Training him for speed... As much better as he was than me I could still guard him in drills pretty well... He splashed a few deep threes right in my face but I also got a piece on a bunch... Simply put he is too slow and weak...  I did play pretty handsy and redirect him a little but he would still get me on moves and I would recover everytime and keep him from getting by... I am pretty fast laterally (it's probably my best sports skill is lateral on ball defense in basketball or man defense as a cornerback in football) but any other player with even a bit of athleticism would dust me if they had this kids moves...

But I mean 6'3" 140.  15 years old.  Can't touch the rim.  I'm 5'11 215 and I was scared to body him cause he might break...  I was explaining to his dad how fuckkng amazing he will be if he just has a tiny bit of strength and speed and his dad kept insisting that I don't know what it's like to be white and that he is slow cause he is white... His dad even had the audacity to tell me that I got my leaping ability from my fathers side after I reminded him I'm Irish!  Ridiculous.  His kid heard it all and it's a racist message and it's bad for everyone to propagate that stereotype...

Of course your in Australia... I dunno what it's like there...  The stereotype is definitely more pervasive in America.  It's why you see the third place in the 200m in the olympics by a white guy and lots of great white sprinters and athletes but they are never from America...  If they are from America they never grew up around white people...

But here it's a bad sterotype... The dad is gonna make his kid more of an Adam Morrison than a Manu Ginobili - you think if Manu had grown up in America being told he is white and slow he would have been shamgodding people and dunking on them?  Lol.  Let that stereotype die!  It hurts us all!

44
Basketball / Re: A WHOLE BUNCH OF DUNKS AND SHIT.
« on: August 27, 2016, 03:31:47 pm »
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6U0icnGAwLg" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6U0icnGAwLg</a>

that first dunk is  :wowthatwasnutswtf:

Omg.  I say this humbly as a two footed jumper...

Single leg dunking is just about a million times more beautiful...  Graceful, beautiful, just better in every way...  A powerful two legged  dunk is ugly and brutish wheras a powerful single legged jump is an absolute work of art - combination of grace, fluidity and power...   Wow.  I want to be able to jump off one leg soooo bad...

45
Basketball / Re: A WHOLE BUNCH OF DUNKS AND SHIT.
« on: August 27, 2016, 03:25:35 pm »
wtf.. never saw this before.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jl7m8GgG9Lw" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jl7m8GgG9Lw</a>

I know that gym in Seattle... It's not 12 feet... But it's damn high... I couldn't touch the rim... It's tilted up though so it's hard to say, gotta be more than 11 feet though... Nate still the greatest athlete I have ever competed against in life hands down not even close.   

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 58