Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - vag

Pages: 1 ... 193 194 [195] 196 197 ... 341
2911
Consistency on what used to be short random peaks is a big achievement!!!

2912
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: December 17, 2013, 04:44:36 pm »
17 December 2013

Bodyweight@session : ~91,5kg
Soreness : none
Injuries/aches :  none

5/3/1 beginner template
Wave 3 :: Week 3 :: Day 1

HIGH BAR FULL SQUAT ( 5/3/1 day ):
5@75kg
3@85kg
6@95kg
-Awesome! Predicted 1RM  :personal-record: (~110kg).
6RM  :personal-record: too obviously.
Also first time repping above bw after ~1,5 year.

BENCH PRESS ( Light day ):
5@42,5kg
5@50kg
5@57,5kg
-Paused. Easy. Strong.

STANDING SHOULDERS DB LATERAL RAISES.
12@8kg each hand
12@8kg each hand
12@8kg each hand
-Less challenging, should have used 10s.

SEATED CHEST SUPPORTED ROW MACHINE:
10@75kg
9@75kg ( -1 rep )
8@75kg ( -1 rep )
-Hands were sweating and it ruined grip. FML.

PAUSED STANDING CALVE RAISES MACHINE:
20@60kg
19@60kg ( +1 rep )
17@60kg ( +1 rep )
-Damn hard. Progress very slow but at least steady.

WEIGHTED CRUNCHES MACHINE:
20@100lbs
20@100lbs
20@100lbs
-Stayed at same load because i didn't do them last week.

2913
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: December 15, 2013, 07:41:34 am »
@rapror : Yes, you are right, the higher depth is better. Inspecting the videos, the higher rom ones are much more explosive and stable. The others are slower, it is actually a strength exercise, they are not half squats, they are cheating full squats.

@ian459: Yes they are. The depth varies on what you want to get out of them. For example, adarqui that used them as his main strength exercise went lower, like in my first pic. But you are doing full squats for strength and halfs as a vert-oriented power exercise ( which is the best combo imho ) so do them higher, somewhere around the 2nd pic depth. Here, found a video of Lance coaching them, he discusses the depth too ( 3'' below SVJ depth ):
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoD5ditPmJo" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoD5ditPmJo</a>


2914
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: December 14, 2013, 07:03:59 pm »
So this is my depth at half squats the previous week:



I suppose this is too deep, i remember Lance saying that the ideal depth is a little lower than your RVJ plant depth.
So this week ( today ) i did them like this:



What do you guys think? Is this too high? Which depth should i use?

2915
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: December 14, 2013, 08:51:08 am »
14 December 2013

Bodyweight@session : ~91,5kg
Soreness : none.
Injuries/aches : none.

5/3/1 beginner template
Wave 3 :: Week 2 :: Day 3

BENCH ( 5/3/1 ):
3@52,5kg
3@60kg
8@67,5kg
-I had to do 9 reps to beat last week's 9@65kg PR since 8@67,5 gives slightly lower 1RM. Couldn't, 8th rep was too hard.
Still good though. Also being 0,5 kg lighter than last week gives a silly all time predicted 1RM/BW  :personal-record:

HIGH BAR FULL SQUAT ( Light day ):
5@55kg
5@65kg
5@75kg
-Easy, 55 are actually REA squats, 65 and 75 speed squats.

HALF SQUATS:
3@90kg ( +5 kg )
3@100kg ( +5 kg )
3@110kg ( +5 kg )
-Tried to go a bit higher but not too high. Mechanics still off. Stronger although heavier loads though.

CHINUPS:
10@BW+5kg ( +1 rep ) ,  predicted 1RM :personal-record:
8@BW+5kg ( +1 rep )
6@BW+5kg
-10@BW+5kg is the most ive ever done but i was 3kg lighter back then.
-24 total reps ties the most I've done @BW+5kg and i was also 3kg lighter back then, so double  :personal-record:

LANCE CALVE RAISES ( DL concentric, slow SL eccentric ):
10 each leg@40kg ( +5 kg )
10 each leg@40kg ( +5 kg )
10 each leg@40kg ( +5 kg )
-Very strong despite load increase.

ABS COASTER MACHINE:
20@BW+12,5kg front  ( +2,5 kg )
20@BW+12,5kg left ( +2,5 kg )
20@BW+12,5kg right ( +2,5 kg )
-Reps 15 to 20 were damn hard. Still very strong.

2916
Bios / Re: Animals
« on: December 13, 2013, 01:27:35 pm »

2917
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: December 12, 2013, 01:37:47 pm »
^Thanks, i am having steady progress indeed. But i was coming from ~4 months of no lifting and i gained about 10kgs since i re-started, so it was rather expected. Plus my numbers are still weak. But i am pushing all time PRs on every lift currently so happy with that.

12 December 2013

Bodyweight@session : n/a
Soreness : glutes and VMOs.
Injuries/aches :  none

1,5 hour of full court basketball.
Endurance : Felt a little improved this time finally. However VMOs and glutes gave out on me after a while, not recovered from lifting both yesterday and the day before.
Jumps : Only 1 rim jump at the end ( exhausted ), got an embarrassing 10'2'' dropstep ( 27'' ).  :uhhhfacepalm:

2918
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: December 12, 2013, 06:28:39 am »
11 December 2013

Bodyweight@session : ~91,5kg
Soreness : none
Injuries/aches :  none

5/3/1 beginner template
Wave 3 :: Week 2 :: Day 2

ROMANIAN DEADLIFT ( 5/3/1 ):
3@75kg
3@85kg
9@97,5kg , all time predicted 1RM  :personal-record: ( ~126kg )
-Awesome! Previous predicted 1RM PR was ~123kg ( 10@92,5kg ).

STANDING OVERHEAD PRESS ( 5/3/1 ):
3@35kg
3@40kg
8@45kg , all time predicted 1RM  :personal-record: ( ~56kg )
-Awesome! Previous predicted 1RM PR was ~53kg( 10@40kg ).

BARBELL LUNGES:
8 each leg@20kg
8 each leg@30kg
8 each leg@40kg
-Feels like the limiting factor here ( for now, 2nd session doing them ) is getting used to the movement.

BICEPS EZ BAR CURL:
12@34,5kg
12@34,5kg
12@34,5kg
-Felt a bit harder than last week.

TRICEPS CABLE PUSHDOWN:
12@35kg
12@35kg
12@35kg
-Felt a bit harder than last week too.

2919
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: beast
« on: December 12, 2013, 04:44:10 am »
^Yup, obvious size diff is obvious, from what i see in wikipedia Brian Shaw is 6'8''/440lbs, Phil Heath is 5'9'' competing in the light heavyweight division ( over 176-1/4 lbs. up to & including 198-1/4 lbs ).
Check out this thread that LBSS created: www.adarq.org/basketball/yao-ming-is-fucking-huge/

2920
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: chasing athleticism
« on: December 11, 2013, 11:06:33 am »
Yeah, that looks 10-12 to me. I guess the answer to my question is that your bulk was much more efficient than mine indeed. I thought you were 38'' at a wet 94kg weight, 37'' at 94kg dry already changes much. Also well said, waist circumference is not the start and end of all regarding bf, just a rough indicator. I would bet you look much leaner than the 'obese' person you describe yourself recently, or to what 38'' waist brings to our minds.

2921
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: chasing athleticism
« on: December 11, 2013, 09:46:50 am »
Btw, why have you gotten so fat, 38'' waist sounds too much. No offence , i am more or less the same fat but also much weaker ( relatively and absolutely ). I ask because you started from a pretty lean state, you were at something like 12% judging from the pics? I started this year's bulk at a much fatter state of around 15% and now ( morning dry weight ~90kg, workout wet weight ~92kg, bulk gain ~7kg in 3 months ) my morning waist is around 36''. I would expect your bulking to be much more efficient, mostly because of the original lean state as Lyle preaches. Maybe you were bloated when you measured? Or maybe it was a ( too ) dirty bulk? Mine was pretty clean FWIW.

2922

2923
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: belts are for pussies
« on: December 11, 2013, 05:58:57 am »
Wore belt at my top set last night, it felt great. It was a true 7RM , so there was lot of effort and probably some form breakdown in the latter reps. It was those latter reps that i felt it make a difference, it felt like the belt was taking all the stress from my lower back, making the squat more leg driven. Also indeed i had that feeling more intense at the sticking point ( somewhere between half and quarter depth ), didn't feel something at the eccentric or at the hole. Just a n=1 though, i think i have never ever squatted with belt again, also i am not even close to the strength requirements of the study.

2924
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: December 11, 2013, 05:47:51 am »
10 December 2013

Bodyweight@session : ~91,75kg
Soreness : none
Injuries/aches :  none

5/3/1 beginner template
Wave 3 :: Week 2 :: Day 1

HIGH BAR FULL SQUAT ( 5/3/1 day ):
3@70kg
3@80kg
7@90kg
-Great! Predicted 1RM a tiny bit lower than last week's 9@85kg, but 7@90kg is a 7RM PR, also in last wave's 90kg maxout i could do 5.

BENCH PRESS ( Light day ):
5@42,5kg
5@50kg
5@57,5kg
-Paused. Easy. Strong.

STANDING SHOULDERS DB LATERAL RAISES.
12@8kg each hand
12@8kg each hand
12@8kg each hand
-Those are starting to feel less challenging.

SEATED CHEST SUPPORTED ROW MACHINE:
10@75kg
10@75kg ( +1 rep )
9@75kg ( +1 rep )
-Hard but strong.

PAUSED STANDING CALVE RAISES MACHINE:
20@60kg
18@60kg ( +1 rep )
16@60kg ( +1 rep )
-This is so hard to progress because of the pauses.

WEIGHTED CRUNCHES MACHINE:
Skipped, run out of time.

2925
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: belts are for pussies
« on: December 10, 2013, 10:34:52 am »
Good timing! I was planning to squat with a belt tonight, because apparently i slightly tweaked my lower back on Saturday. Tweak is gone now but i will squat belted, precautionary and out of curiosity from this read.

Pages: 1 ... 193 194 [195] 196 197 ... 341