Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - vag

Pages: 1 ... 175 176 [177] 178 179 ... 341
2641
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: June 16, 2014, 04:52:05 am »
Awesomeness, I love your weight loss. It's an interesting coincidence that I decide to focus almost entirely on weight loss and then I read this post the very next thing.

Thanks!
According to the curves of the so far progress ( which is more ore less linear, so i can trust the trend-lines ) i will reach 15% bodyfat at around 83,5kg and 14% at 81kg.
I can relate to your post a lot, i am very curious too to see what will happen to everything if i am (relatively) light and lean.

2642
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: June 15, 2014, 01:33:32 pm »
15 June 2014

MORNING:

Body composition measurements:

Net morning weight : 84,7kg / 186,35lbs , broke the 85 kg barrier!  :wowthatwasnutswtf:
Waist : 88,5cm / 34,85''

Online bodyfat estimation : 16.5%
BI scale bodyfat estimation : 15.6%
AVERAGE bodyfat estimation : 16.05%

Previous:
Net morning weight : 85kg / 187lbs
Waist : 88,5cm / 34,85''

Online bodyfat estimation : 16.5%
BI scale bodyfat estimation : 15.9%
AVERAGE bodyfat estimation : 16.2%

Measurements maybe a bit skewed because i had breakfast and morning coffee. Maybe 84,5kg and 88cm waist would be more realistic. More or less there though, we will see next week. It is going good for sure...

EVENING:

Bodyweight@session : ~86kg
Soreness : glutes and hamstrings.
Injuries/aches :  none

1,5km STEADY PACE JOGGING:
10 minutes 2 seconds.
That gives a pace of 9km per hour or 6minutes 40 seconds per km.
This is a  :personal-record: , last year that i did steady pace jogging for a while best i got was 6:50 and i considered it a great one. This is awesome because i was going totally shutdown now, those tempos that i have been consistent with do work!

5 minutes rest

TEMPO RUNS:
10x100m @ 50%
-1 minute rest between runs. Times steady at around 23 seconds.
Awesome. Feeling very light on my feet and having very good recovery too.

I will use such ( very low impact ) workouts for the following weeks, gonna use them as recovery workouts between gym and jumps. It is going to go like:
-Day 1 : gym ( peak workout, supramax half squats + jump squats )
-Day 2 : recovery workout ( steady pace jog + 50% tempos )
-Day 3 : ME jumping ( possibly a couple of ME sprints after the jumps too )
-Day 4 : rest ( this may be skipped, or done on-off )
-Repeat.

2643
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: June 14, 2014, 01:05:18 pm »
14 June 2014

Bodyweight@session : ~85,5kg , season low
Soreness : none
Injuries/aches : none

Kelly Baggett's simple periodization routine

PHASE III , Week 3/3

Session B:

27'' DEPTH JUMPS:
4x5
-Very good.

JUMP SQUATS:
2x5@20kg
-Very good.

HIGH BAR FULL SQUAT 3x3 with 5RM:
3@95kg
3@95kg
3@95kg
-Hard but nice.

HORIZONTAL LEG PRESS CALVES 'RAISES':
10@495lbs ( +5 lbs )
10@495lbs ( +5 lbs )
10@495lbs ( +5 lbs )
-Reached machine's stack. Turning it to 3xF now. 3x10@495 felt like pretty close to max anyway.

CHINUPS:
8@BW+12kg ( -3kg )( -1 rep )
8@BW+12kg ( -3kg )
10@BW
-Belt has disappeared from the gym so had to use DBs. That ruined my mechanics as shown by the numbers.
Added an unweighted back-off set, adding a 3d set to all upper body stuff now.

DIPS:
10@BW  , ties :personal-record:
9@BW
8@BW
-Strong here.

So it has ended, i have reached the peak phase, finally. Everything is timed right, including BW, let's wait and see what happens!

2644
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: June 13, 2014, 03:05:13 pm »
13 June 2014

30-40 minutes lower body static stretching.
Was very tight, really needed it!

2645
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: June 12, 2014, 02:24:30 pm »
12 June 2014

Bodyweight@session : 86,5kg
Soreness : calves still a bit sore
Injuries/aches :  none

ME RIM JUMPS:
SVJ : ~26'' , ties season best
Dropstep : ~29'' , ties season best
1-step-DLRVJ : ~30'' , ties season best 
2-steps-DLRVJ : 29''-30'' , dropoff
Full runup DLRVJs : ~29'' , booooo
-Legs got tired too soon, after the 1-step ones everything felt too awkward/stiff/uncoordinated. I was frustrated and disappointed because i wanted 31'' but then i took a look at my log and saw that previous ME jumps session was 10 days ago and before that it was another 2 weeks.
So how can i expect progress at something i am not practicing? That's right, i can't!  :pissed:
Anyway, i've got one more workout on Saturday and then i enter the peak phase, so based on programming i am gonna be jumping much more often.

2646
Russian Squatting Routine, http://www.exrx.net/WeightTraining/Weightlifting/RussianSquatProgramGenerator.html, he did it earlier this year with great success.

2647
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Two Hands Two Feet
« on: June 12, 2014, 06:14:27 am »
Worked out that I need about 2,400 cals per day (BW in lbs x 12). I want to try a bit of a recomp so am going to shoot for 3,000 cals on training days and 2,000 on rest days.

I am interested in this approach. Have you ever tried it again? How did it work for you?

2648
Why are you getting annoyed? People are trying to help you. Would you prefer it if it was a desolate journal and you had no feedback?
Also i refuse to believe that you called for help and nobody replied. But say it happened. So what? Maybe nobody noticed it. Maybe nobody disagreed with what you said back then. Also, you seem to react too intense and defensive to all advices that deviate from what you had in mind, so that may discourage people to interfere, but that may be just my wicked perception. Who cares anyway, now people noticed and they tried to contribute.
ANYWAY, back on topic, nobody told you to not squat, not do RSR, not chase 180squat@85kg. People were trying to tell you ( i think, i can't speak for everyone ) that it would be very beneficial if you did some work to preserve some movement efficiency and 'athleticism' while pushing your squat up.

2649
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: June 11, 2014, 07:19:42 pm »
^Yes, most probably because I went deeper.

2650
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: June 11, 2014, 02:33:46 pm »
11 June 2014

Bodyweight@session : ~86kg
Soreness : glutes, calves, chest.
Injuries/aches :  none

5' jogging

Dynamic warmup

3 mins rest

TEMPO RUNS:
5x87m @ 60%
3 mins rest
5@87m @ 60%
3 mins rest
5@87m @ 60%
-45 seconds rest between runs. Times consistent around 17:50.
Took this really easy, wanted to use this mostly as a recovery workout with a tad of conditioning.

2651
You might want to read this:
http://www.higher-faster-sports.com/reactiveability.html

You might want to focus on this part:
Quote
Don't Screw Up Your Natural Reactive Function

One way we screw up reactive function is by inactivity. This is illustrated by comparing the technical running ability of the typical 16 yr old Playstation freak to that of a kid on the playground. As we get older we become less and less active and "play less". Playgrounds and furniture are used in pursuit of the opposite sex instead of playtime. This process isn't helped any by the huge growth spurt that occurs during adolescence - a time when most start to become less active and when they really need to become more active.

Another way we can detract from our reactive functions is by engaging in too much of a good thing regarding strength training without regard to function. I know I've preached about the importance of strength but now I need to qualify a couple of things here. Strength training is capable of doing some very magnificent things when it comes to improving the level of force we can take in and put out in our movements, but, used haphazardly and without attention to function, it is also capable of changing our movements from what naturally should be a reflexive dominant movement into a muscular dominant movement with the result of this being inefficient movement and injuries.


Come on man, you know much better than that:
im really really skeptical of what these guys say/claim regarding reactivity. I don't believe it. IF i was to quantify my belief in it, i'd say maybe they're 2-3% correct. Unless I see proof i'm not going to change my mind, there is a lot of bs info in training, including jump training and otherwise on the internet.


2652
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: June 11, 2014, 04:49:24 am »
10 June 2014

Bodyweight@session : ~85.85 , season low
Soreness : none
Injuries/aches : none

Kelly Baggett's simple periodization routine

PHASE III , Week 3/3

Session A:

27'' DEPTH JUMPS:
4x5
-Very good.

JUMP SQUATS:
2x5@20kg
-Very good.

HALF SQUAT @ 85%:
6x3@100kg
-Awesome: deeper, faster, more robust.
Half squats are so much easier/better for me. Everything feels easy, 'right', it is a movement my body favors, in contrast to the full squat.
Have i done wrong to focus on fulls? I think not. But should i have kept some halves variation in my programming? Probably yes.

PAUSED STANDING CALVES RAISES MACHINE:
20@70kg ( +5kg )
19@70kg ( +5kg ) , ( +1 rep )
17@70kg ( +5kg )
-It looks like i have done a big mistake chasing 3x20 all year long. I was stuck at 55-60kg forever and now at 70kg i am getting the same reps.

BENCH PRESS:
4@70kg
8@60kg
15@50kg
-Got fed up of being stuck forever at 2x8 so decided to change things up, go for a 'heavy' set and then do two back-offs.
Wanted 5 reps for the 70kg and 10 reps for the 60kg, failed both. Liked the 15-rep finisher though. Lets see how this progresses.

PULLUPS:
9@BW ( +1 rep ) , :personal-record:
7@BW
-Ugly slow exhausting 9th rep, but PR is PR. Also obviously 2-sets-total-reps  :personal-record:

2653
Just for the record, i am with raptor here. Good fail or bad fail , it is a fail and it fucks up your CNS plus increases injury risks. Not that you should never fail or that your progress with that programming was not jaw-dropping anyway, but imho failing too often is not optimal. You could have achieved even more.
According to your preferred style of training, i think you could benefit a lot going kingfish-style:
Not daily, you will AREG the frequency. But whenever you train, build up to a heavy single ( 90%+ ) and try to evaluate how much more you had in you like he does. When you repeat a couple of +20lbs sessions, advance. If you need the volume, add a back-off set, but look again how much he reduces the weight, he singles 450lbs and does back-off with 315. Also look at how patient he is to get a PR, he might wait for weeks or months. Finally look how he AREGs the whole thing, carefully deloading and waiting for his body to recover when beat, constantly attacking when strong.
Just another possibility to consider :D

2654
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: beast
« on: June 09, 2014, 07:30:18 am »
^^^ Her thigh circumference is comparable with her waist!  :P

2655
i upvoted a bunch of adarq's posts to restore the natural balance of things.

A noble act but in vain, you aquiring the reputation throne is inevitable...

Pages: 1 ... 175 176 [177] 178 179 ... 341