Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - vag

Pages: 1 ... 170 171 [172] 173 174 ... 341
2566
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: July 10, 2014, 03:15:51 pm »
^^^
Yes, that is the shoe, supernova glide 6. I chose this of all available boosts because according to the reviews it has the most 'firm' feeling of them. It has a thin layer of 'harder' EVA foam between the boost foam and the foot so it feels less mushy and deforms less, supposedly.

10 July 2014

Bodyweight@session : forgot to check
Soreness : none
Injuries/aches :  none

1km RUN: 5 minutes, averge speed = 12kmh , :personal-record:
Previous PR was 5minutes 21 seconds / 11,18kmh from a mile run.
That was not even close to max, i was saving for the sprints.

5 minutes rest

SPRINTS:

80m@100% : 11:50 ,  :personal-record: , previous was 11:90,

3 minutes rest

80m@100% : 11:30 ,  :personal-record: , previous was the above.

5 minutes rest

100m@100% : 15:30 ,  :personal-record: , previous was 15:50

5 minutes rest

100m@100% : 14:90 ,  :personal-record:  :personal-record:  :personal-record: , previous was the above.

:almostascoolasnyancat: , placebo or not i was flying! :D

Then i tried some jumps but only the 9'6'' rim was free and that ruined my mechanics. Can't jump well there, I can't judge the correct spot to plant, I can't time my highest touch well etc. Also i can't know what heights i got without cam, from where i felt hitting the rim it must have been 3'' below wrist so around 30''. We will have to wait for 10' jumps to know.

2567
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: July 10, 2014, 05:13:55 am »
9 July 2014

Bodyweight@session : forgot to check
Soreness : Chest, lats, calves sore. quads, glutes, abductors, hamstrings feeling something between sore and too stiff. 130kg speed halfs wrecked me, lol
Injuries/aches :  none

1km jogging

Dynamic warmup

TEMPO RUNS:
5x80m , building up intensity from 50 to 80%.
-Really bad. Feeling too stiff, like there was no energy transfer through my legs.

5 minutes rest

Then i wanted to do this:
1) 300m @ 100%

2) Some challenging lactate run
- could be 2x3x200 - 2 mins between the reps (200, 2min, 200, 2min, 200) & 10 mins between sets - start off trying to hit 30,30,30 & 30,30,28 and get better each week

300m@10% : 54 seconds
-Heh, not that bad. It is 3x100m@17s, so given my 15.5s PR, this was pretty good.

10 minutes rest

200m@100% : 34 seconds ( actually big  :personal-record:, i was at 38 seconds this April )
2 minutes rest
200m@100% : 36 seconds ( also  :personal-record: compared to April )
2 minutes rest
200m@100% : DNF ( gave up at around 150m, i just couldn't run anymore, i would have to jog )

Decided to call it a day and not try a second set given i could not even complete the first one.

5 minutes rest.

1km cooldown jog.

That was interesting. I am wasting my time on this 80x50 gravel football field though, the times I post are useless:
As discussed again here, those are not sprints, i have to decelerate much to take the 90 degree turns. Now what good is a 300m sprint if i have to do 4 such cuts? That's what i thought.
Still, i like the concept of the longer sprints, even if they are 'sprints'. Gotta get to the damn track and see how much my real splits deviate from those.

In other news, my boost shoes just arrived and they are sexyyyyyyy, can't wait to run&jump in them  :wowthatwasnutswtf:

2568
Interesting too. I doubt i will ever reach the stubborn fat stage as he describes it though (four-and-a-half-pack abs). Most of what he says applies for other fat ranges anyway.
IF is a totally different world from the one i thought it was, i am glad i asked.

2569
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: July 09, 2014, 07:10:30 am »
8 July 2014

Bodyweight@session : ~84.75kg
Soreness : none
Injuries/aches : none

Kelly Baggett's simple periodization routine

PHASE IV ( Peak )

Workout #7

9'' DEPTH JUMPS:
2x10
-Awesome.

COMPLEX :
C1 : HALF SQUAT:
5@130kg
5@130kg
-Easier than last time. Kinda fast actually, awesome!

C2: JUMP SQUAT:
2x5@20kg
-Awesome.

PAUSED STANDING CALVES RAISES MACHINE:
18@75kg
17@75kg
15@75kg
-Same reps with last time. Did not do 80kg by mistake, goal is 3x15 here so was above it already.

BENCH PRESS:
4@72,5kg , ties 4RM  :personal-record:
9@62,5kg ( +1 rep )
14@52,5kg ( +1 rep )
-Some progress so nice.

PULLUPS:
8@BW + 5kg ( -2 reps ) , ( +5kg ):personal-record:
8@BW + 5kg ( +5kg ):personal-record:
8@BW  ( +1rep )
-PRs are because it is my first time ever doing them weighted.

4th week of peaking. Kinda losing its meaning. Also bored of it. Half squats get better and better but  i don't know, i feel the crave to do deep ones too.
New shoes are supposed to arrive this week so i will wait to have a couple of 'peaked' ME jump sessions in them and then end it.

2570
Futbol (soccer) / Re: The WC 2014 thread
« on: July 09, 2014, 06:54:42 am »
I hope Argentina wins like in 1978

LOL, not gloriously and with universal acclaim like in 1986? But shamefully and manipulated and like in 1978?

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/argentinas-1978-world-cup-win-052800565--sow.html
http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jun/28/world/fg-mundial28

At the same mundial that this happened? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle_of_Cordoba

Nice choice!  :P


Speaking of Argentina, and Brazil's defeat...


2571
Enlightening.

2572
The stubborn fat thing is legit. It increases blood flow to stubborn fat cells or something like that. Also boosts growth hormone. It's not as simple as more frequency, more anabolic.

Ah, that's what i was asking in my first post.
now it is a mechanism again, not a method. I am very interested, both about stubborn fat and even more about the GH factor. I will try to read more to it.

Entropy, i don't really fall for the single digits story bro, sorry. Going from 15 to 14% or from 10 to 9%, I believe that frequent meals in whatever quantities to meet your daily caloric plan is the optimal way, because of the much greater time of the day that you stay on anabolic state.

this is broscience of the purest, highest grade.

It is??? WTF, you are destroying my perception about diet/nutrition.
Maybe i did not elaborate enough, by 'whatever quantities to meet your caloric plans' i meant your pre-specified daily diet plan divided ( not necessarily equally ) in meals, not random calories and nutrients. So, if you were to eat 1500 kcals with 150g protein ( random example, also predetermined fats and carbs but too bored to include them in the example ), i thought that doing three 500kcal-50g meals would be anabolic-wise better than fast and eat them in one. Could be 800-60 / 350-30 / 350-60, no big fuss. But sure better than one-off. I also know that there is too much hype around the meals number, e.g. 4 to 6 meals is no real difference, but 2 to 4 is. I know that anabolic/catabolic is not a time switch, you were not 100% anabolic for 2 hours and 59 minutes and turned 100% catabolic at 3 hours and 1 minute. But i thought the whole thing works like that, the more time passes from your last meal , the more the percentage switches from anabolic to catavolic state, that well-known curve, you know it, too bored to post it. Is that a myth???

2573
LBSS, that's what i thought. It seemed to me more like a method. In the same lines of 'drink a ton of water before lunch so you won't be so hungry'. I dont get it because although i love food and eating big, i can be very consistent with any diet plan, whatever it is, fasting, many small meals, force-feeding, no prob. But i understand many people are not like that so they need their methods.
Entropy, i don't really fall for the single digits story bro, sorry. Going from 15 to 14% or from 10 to 9%, I believe that frequent meals in whatever quantities to meet your daily caloric plan is the optimal way, because of the much greater time of the day that you stay on anabolic state.
But it doesn't mean fasting doesn't work. If it is more convenient for you, i am with you. I mean if without fasting you may slip and eat more, or it is too much trouble to track nutrients and count meals and have meals too, or for whatever reasons you feel better when fasting, then you are right to choose it. In my eyes it is a ( slightly? ) less effective fat loss method but for many people it may be much more convenient and easy to keep at, so in the end they will get better results.
Carry on :D

2574
Do you think that fasting is more effective for fat loss than regular reduced caloric value meals?
I mean, if you are going to intake the same amount of kcals one day, say 1500, why fast? I would expect regular meals that keep you in an anabolic state more time to be better.
Is there a mechanism i am not aware of that burns more fat? Or is fasting just a way to be sure you got a bigger daily caloric deficit?
LBSS, what's your view on this?

2575
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: July 07, 2014, 07:11:43 pm »
Try one leg jumps in your frees and see what you get.

I always do SLRVJs too in my jump sessions this year, just don't log them. They are steady at around 27''.
In frees it is the opposite of DLRVJs, the extra flex makes them feel more natural and fluid and with a more powerful toe off. Still 27'' though.

2576
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: July 07, 2014, 03:00:55 pm »
7 July 2014

Bodyweight@session : ~84,75kg
Soreness : none
Injuries/aches :  none

ME RIM JUMPS:
SVJ : max = 26''
Dropstep : max = 30''
1-step-DLRVJ : max = 31'' , ties season best!
2-steps-DLRVJ : max = 31'' , ties season best!
Full runup DLRVJs : max = 31'' , ties season best!

Mixed emotions. Getting season best heights but not PRing. Not gonna happen without new shoes, my Kobes are totally worn out, the traction is terrible and i think the zoom bags blew off too. Can't jump good on my running shoes either, i tried it, they are frees and the too much flex ruins my mechanics. Pity, i would have PRed for sure today, 30'' was all voluntary, getting it easy off 1 step.
New trainers are on the way ( adidas supernova glide 6 boost ) , i got the most 'firm' boost shoe out there, lets see how that overhyped TPU magic foam will work.

2577
DAY 6/7
1) 300m @ 100% ***If you are up to doing this twice a week do it first on this day or else it won't be a good test.

2) Some challenging lactate run
- could be 2x3x200 - 2 mins between the reps (200, 2min, 200, 2min, 200) & 10 mins between sets - start off trying to hit 30,30,30 & 30,30,28 and get better each week

Niceeeee! Gonna start doing this.

2578
- DLRVJ x ~15
not the best but consistently 34-35, mid-palm. approach still a bit inconsistent, not getting as much out of it as i can sometimes.

This sentence shows how much you have progressed!
Gets even better when you consider you are unable to squat for quite some time now. Or was that a good thing to an extent, a forced break from too much squat focus?

2579
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: July 06, 2014, 03:50:48 pm »
6 July 2014

Bodyweight@session : ~84,75kg
Soreness : none
Injuries/aches :  none

1,6km ( 1 mile ) STEADY PACE JOGGING RUNNING:
Total time = 8 minutes 35 seconds ( -40 seconds )  :personal-record:  :personal-record:  :personal-record:
Average speed = 11,18 km/h ( +0.85kmh ) , broke the 11 km/h barrier
Pace  = 5 minutes 21 seconds per km ( -26 seconds per km )
-Huge PR!!! But i can't call it jogging anymore, it was running, not max possible pace but at least 80%.
Delighted with 8:35, that is an amazing time for my unfit old fat ass.

5 minutes rest

100m TEMPO RUNS ( 1 minute rest between runs ):
5x100m@60% + 1x100m@80%
-Times for 60% : 20-21 seconds.
-Time for 80% : 17:50
Wanted to go 50% but i couldn't, my legs denied, i could ether jog or go 60%. Weird.

Wanted to do another set of tempos but legs felt tired so called it a day because i want to do ME jumps tomorrow.

2580
Article & Video Discussion / Re: Boingterd???
« on: July 05, 2014, 04:28:49 pm »
Much boing, very vert, so tdub, wow.

Extended info and lulz here:
http://www.adarq.org/call-em-out/boingvert-lmfao-boingvert-com-scam-fraud/

Pages: 1 ... 170 171 [172] 173 174 ... 341