Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - vag

Pages: 1 ... 165 166 [167] 168 169 ... 341
2491
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: August 26, 2014, 05:22:35 am »
Do you roll your feet? If not do. I use a golf ball.

Golf ball? Who are you, Chuck Norris???  :P

But yeah, i should roll much more often. You will find endless posts in here where i rant against myself for not stretching/rolling. I do it frequently only when injured and then randomly once every 2 months on average. Dumb, must change it.


Some people don't even have a plantaris :D

I know , there are even some people that can't say "sch"  :trollface:

btw, i am sure you are not aware that this Greek "sh" discussion, it is a repost:

Ella!

I work for a Greek company... I could never understand why greeks can't say "sh" or "sch" as in Porsche.

:motherofgod:

2492
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: August 25, 2014, 07:36:43 pm »
We can say it, easily. I don't know why you think we can't.
You won't hear us say it  though, because indeed it doesn't exist, I can't recall any sch or whatever 'fat' sh pronounced word.
You may hear it in a few local dialects but it will be words that were supposed to be pronounced with s, they wrongly pronounce them with sch and they are mocked for it (redneck style).
 Everyone happy? Anybody want to help me with my plantaris/upper calf pain?
 ;D

2493
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: August 25, 2014, 03:12:09 pm »
25 August 2014

Bodyweight@session : ~83.5kg
Soreness : none
Injuries/aches : weird random pain at left... plantaris? see description later.

-45 minutes of bball stuff ( dribbling, shooting, layups etc ). Including a couple of hard tomahawks on the 9'6'' rim.  8)
Tons of fatigue, tons of sweat, aeons out of shape. Expected.

ME JUMPS:
SLRVJ : ~26''
SVJ : ~26''
Dropstep : ~28''
1-step DLRVJ : ~29''
2-steps DLRVJ : ~29''
3-steps DLRVJ : ~29''
-Best i could get was wrist at 9'8'' rim. Not too bad, not too good. Uncoordinated and stiff at runups. Expected.

ME SPRINTS:
3x80m : 13.2 , 12.5 , 12.2
2x100m : 16.2 , 16.1
-Again uncoordinated, all good up to 50-60m but maintaining top speed felt too unnatural and tiring at the same time. Expected too.

Overall though, jumps are ~1-2 inches lower and sprints ~1 second slower than pre-holidays PRs. So it was rather good.

Now, the pain, i get this random sharp ( but not too intense ) pain on my left leg, right under the knee, at the back side. It appeared randomly during holidays too, can't find what triggers it. Also it is not daily, it disappears and reappears after 3-4 days, once, then leaves again. Today it didn't bug at all during bball and dunks and jumps, it appeared at the 80m sprints ( only at acceleration phase, not at top speed ) and disappeared again at the 100m sprints. Any ideas what it could possibly be, anyone?

2494
MUSiC anD SHeeT! / Re: What Are You Listening To Right Now?
« on: August 25, 2014, 02:54:21 pm »
^ blocked also here.

2495
^Up-voted this, not for the migraine of course, for having an awesome time and for  :welcome: back! :D

2496
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: August 25, 2014, 06:08:20 am »
Aaaaaand, i am back! :D

Body composition measurements:

Net morning weight : 82.2kg / 181.2lbs , season low , :wowthatwasnutswtf:
Waist : 86cm / 33.85'' , ties all time lowest measurement ,  :wowthatwasnutswtf:

Online bodyfat estimation : 15% , ties all time  lowest measurement ,  :wowthatwasnutswtf:
BI scale bodyfat estimation : 14.8% , not 100% sure but this also has to be all time  :personal-record: , :wowthatwasnutswtf:
AVERAGE bodyfat estimation : 14.9% , broke under 15% on this average value ,  :personal-record::wowthatwasnutswtf:

Previous:
Net morning weight : 82.4kg / 181.6lbs , same with last time, ties season low!!!
Waist : 86cm / 33.85'' ,  new all time  :personal-record: , broke the 34'' barrier  :wowthatwasnutswtf:

Online bodyfat estimation : 15%
BI scale bodyfat estimation : n/a
AVERAGE bodyfat estimation : n/a

Not bad at all for not having done anything even moderately challenging for 3 weeks.

Ok, NEW SEASON. Still thinking about it.
Want to change things around a bit. Not gonna bulk for now, will stick to what i said, attempt to stay at this BW and get stronger/leaner.
Gonna start with GPP style gym, then switch to volume-intensity alternating. I want  to be 'athletically functional' all year round this time, as opposed to the previous years tactics ( bulk to 92+kg / ~20% bf all winter, neglect running & jumping, start cutting and jumping in the spring ). I will try to go out and do sprints and jumps and bball stuff as often as possible. As i also said, there is also the option/possibility of joining a track&field team, but gotta contact them to learn more. I would like to have a great bball endurance this year, i want to be able to use my -whatever mediocre- strength and jumping ability all around the game, not for the first 10 mins, lol. So what i was thinking was to use more bball sessions, instead of going out and doing tempos and jumps and sprints, go and do up-tempo bball practice. Maybe start with that, give some rest and then do some ME jumps/sprints for a finisher.
Dunno, will see , still trying to set it up in my mind.

:lololol:

2497
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: August 14, 2014, 12:29:40 pm »
But i'm done with this discussion/debate, it's utterly pointless so i'm bowing out. No ones mind will be change today or ever, you gotta learn the hard way and then it's always obvious that the best advice was the one we didn't want to contemplate.

Very much disagree with the first part ( useless debate ) , love the last part ( best advice is the one you didn't follow ).
Those debates are always very useful, as long as you see them as training philosophy and understanding evaluation/readjustment and not internet flame wars that you have to convince the  world you are right and everyone else is wrong. Not saying you do that, talking generally. In our case, you are right that you can't convince me to go to 8% to bulk again and i can't convince you to start bulking right away. But maybe you have planted a seed in my mind and i will not start at 14-15% but try to get a little lower , like 12-13. And maybe i did the same to you, maybe you will not wait to go to 70kg/8% but start a bit higher, like 75/10. And that would most probably be very much beneficial for both of us. It is a try and catch process, chasing the 'golden mean'.

2498
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: August 13, 2014, 09:50:48 am »
Fair arguments. But you guys do take it to the extreme.

raptor, there does not exist only 9% and 18%. There is also 85kg/15% which compromises the two words pretty well, and is much more realistic for my case anyway.

entropy, i agree with your bulk&cut logic, i agree a lot. But your examples are evidently wrong and skewed to make your case strong:

Starting a bulk at 85kg means now your bodyfat goes up from ~13kg (~15%) to  18kg (~20%). Now you have 10kg more bodyfat than your athletic bodfat amount shud be. Oops. Good luck cutting 10kg off, which wins you not much.

In contrast suppose you cut to 75kg and now have a bodyfat of 7.5kg. You bulk up 10kg, maybe gain 5kg of lean mass (not muscle either, just lean mass which is water etc).

In the first case, the 85kg 15% guy became 20%bf with 18kg of fat, so he is 90kg. So his added weight was 100% fat?
In the second case, an 75kg-10% guy bulked 10kg and MAYBE 5kg of them was not fat?
Also, i did not cut from 90 to 85, i cut from 92 to 82 and that does make a huge difference.
Also, you are not 15%, you cut from ~95 to ~75, you log that you have a six-pack and visible veins in your abs.
For god's shake, get your numbers stairght!!!

But i still agree with your logic. And yes, bulking is more efficient the leaner you are so you do serve your goals better if you start leaner. But that does not mean 70kg-8%, the threshold that lyle sets for an effective bulk is 15%.

So here is my perspective :  I have done many bulk and cut cycles, and it seems that the efficiency for me is around 60% for both. I track it, i log it too if you search. That means that when i bulk it is 60%LBM-40%fat gain, and when i cut it is 60%fat-40%LBM loss. That means that in every cycle i end up 20% better. This is what i do. And it works, i end up at the same weights ( bulk or cut ) every time at a better bf%. Previous year i was 92kg/19%, this one  i was 92/18, previous year after cut i was 82/16%, now i am 82/15%. Next year i will bulk to 92/17% and cut at to 82/14%. And i will still be at the bodyweight i like being for most of the time and my clothes will fit me well too.


PS : what part of my last post made you both think imma bulk and led you to prompt me not to? I said i do NOT intend to bulk yet like i did all other years, i said i want to explore what happens in this low bw and reconsider:

Still cutting though, and i will not start bulking when i go back to gym in 10 days. Gonna try to stay at 81-82 that i will be by then and improve as much as i can strength and movement efficiency at that weight to see what will happen.

:lololol:

2499
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: August 12, 2014, 06:32:09 pm »
@LBSS : just when that thread was opened here. Might redo it, was funny.

@raptor: one reason is the stated, my wardrobe will be useless. But as i have said many times, i prefer being heavier, carrying more muscle. I just like it. If i could choose i would much prefer to be like NFL guys and lebron( the 270ish, not the current ) over high/long jumpers and durant. Still cutting though, and i will not start bulking when i go back to gym in 10 days. Gonna try to stay at 81-82 that i will be by then and improve as much as i can strength and movement efficiency at that weight to see what will happen.

2500
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: beast
« on: August 12, 2014, 06:22:35 pm »
^To make this even more impressive, he is 6'3''/250. NFL is the shit!

2501
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: chasing athleticism
« on: August 12, 2014, 06:20:04 pm »
IIRC, kellyb said that to get potentiated you need to wear it all day, to really trick your CNS that you are heavier. Also he said that it can't be used all the time, CNS catches up with the trick. But it does work. Too bored to find the abstract now but i can if you are interested.

2502
You NEED to step your game up, 2 sprints per training day won't get you anywhere.

2503
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: August 11, 2014, 09:50:24 am »
Body composition measurements:

Net morning weight : 82.4kg / 181.6lbs , same with last time, ties season low!!!
Waist : 86cm / 33.85'' ,  new all time  :personal-record: , broke the 34'' barrier  :wowthatwasnutswtf:

Online bodyfat estimation : 15%
BI scale bodyfat estimation : n/a
AVERAGE bodyfat estimation : n/a

Previous:
Net morning weight : 82.4kg / 181.6lbs
Waist : 86.5cm / 34.05'' ,  new all time  :personal-record:

Online bodyfat estimation : 15.4%
BI scale bodyfat estimation : n/a
AVERAGE bodyfat estimation : n/a

Woah, it is working.
Same weight but smaller waist. Maybe water ( or whatever ) retention because i cant see how my bodyfat dropped and my weight is the same, you don't add muscle while sitting on your butt and dieting every day.
I look leaner too. Abs are now 2-and-a-half-pack in the morning, cuts more visible in shoulder muscles, bicep veins a bit more visible, vmos and back kinda more toned too.
Still, gonna go entropy style and say that to be truly lean ( not 10% or anything close to that, just typical lean looking, legit 13-14 ) i should be below 80, probably closer to 75. And there we have a problem because i don't want to be that light, not to mention that my clothes wont fit me.
We will see, carrying on as i am for now, IF FTW!!!!

2504
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: chasing athleticism
« on: August 11, 2014, 09:36:34 am »
I think you are faster now too. In that 'intermediate' video, IIRC, you were more powerful and you were getting higher too. But now you look so much lighter on your feet, you are bouncing. Ive had it happen to me too, after a small time of cutting ( including jumps practice of course ) you get the best jumps, sudden loss of weight with minimum loss of strength. As the cut continues you get more smooth, light on feet, reactive etc but eventually the jumps suffer because of the strength loss. Could be a personal thing though, cant generalize, just my n=1.

2505
And i got pretty much into sprinting the previous month too. Was even considering joining a track&field freshly opened class from September in a part of a 'functional athlete' focus shift, not sure if the hours fit me yet though, but the track does drag me more and more.

Pages: 1 ... 165 166 [167] 168 169 ... 341