Read his dispute over prosthetics in wikipedia. It's all well cited, at least from the bits I've read. CAS actually repealed IAAF's ban on him because they didn't present enough evidence to show he had an unfair advantage, especially when weighed against his disadvantages like his slower starts. (In the video you can see he's still behind everyone at around the 150m mark.
doesn't matter. he's NOT RUNNING. what he's doing is a different thing. the fact that his disadvantage in the start might make up for his huge advantage in the upright portion of the race doesn't deny the fact that the blades give him a huge advantage while moving forward at high speed.
plus it's only a matter of time before they come up with blades that eliminate the problems with the start. what, are they gonna calibrate the technology so it meets some random standard for correlation with human speed?
Whether or not you want to consider what he is doing as "running" or not is immaterial to the debate. The salient point is that blades dramatically change the dynamics of the race. Pistorius seems to be really passionate about track and field and it's very much a feel good story which gets track and field some more exposure (which it desperately needs). The CAS decision was purely political.
This will go on until Oscar (or another para athlete) runs a world leading time or wins a diamond league event. Only then will the able-bodied athletes federations whose medals and money he is taking point out the litany of differences between running on compressive blades...
I agree track and field is in need of exposure. My problem with this is, he is not competing on the same terms as everybody else. I dont care wether or not he has an disadvantage in the start or wether that is equal or not to his advantage with the blades. The reason track and field works as a sport is the fact that I can run 100m in Denmark and be compared to someone running in the US. All the rules and restrictions regarding the equipment allowed, how the track is build, what its made of, wind, etc. etc. This is what makes the sport possible at all. And he does NOT fit under those rules. If he is allowed to use those blades, then everyone should, and then we will see Usain Bolt running with tiny short blades under his shoes.
That he has a pasion for track and field is great. But I have a passion for track and field, but Im not blessed with the talent that Jurgen Schultz has, or the long arms of some other world class discus thrower. Should I then be allowed to use a speciel discus in competition or some lengthening device for my arms?
I hope I make sense. When it comes to discussions in english, sometimes Im lost for words.