2176
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: The PR's/PB's, videos, pictures, and daily achievements thread
« on: April 05, 2012, 10:16:41 pm »
8rm Squat PR
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jT5VbgiN2_s
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
If drugs are really as far in front of the testers as this dude says they are than I guess I could believe it. However, if there was a decent chance they'd get caught I don't think they'd risk it. Imagine how much Usain Bolt stands to lose financially if he tests positive to PED's. Majority of his money would come from sponsers and endorsements and his profile would be shattered overnight. Same as any top sprinter coz the sprinters at the very top have the most to lose.
With that you somehow assume that Athlete A personally believes he would be able to perform as well even with-out drugs. But how can assume that? Maybe A's opinion is that he has some serious competition and regardless of whether this competition is doping, he might think that HE HAS TO in order to stay at the top. So while there is an obvious risk to taking banned substances the NET RISK is suddenly not as high anymore. Because what would happen if A's performance drops because of not doping?
I do not think it is an exaggeration.
In a kinesiology class I took we watched documentaries that exposed other horror stories, such as the scandals in East Germany.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2005/nov/01/athletics.gdnsport3
Those athletes did not know they were being doped until they started experiencing side effects such as facial hair growth and things of that nature (in female athletes).
I don't believe it's impossble to run 9.7 without drugs. But it may be a false hope because I understand that all sprinters are pretty much doping. That I have heard before.