Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - adarqui

Pages: 1 ... 1439 1440 [1441] 1442 1443 ... 1504
21601
Crazy Weird Analysis & Stuff :) / Re: The Squat Thread
« on: March 21, 2010, 03:32:09 am »
from allstarNZ on TVS:

SHR: 50.7 (36/71)*100
Squatting deep: Easy, some minor lower back rounding when VERY deep.


(expletive), EXACTLY the same SHR as you adarqui haha.

21602
Crazy Weird Analysis & Stuff :) / Re: The Squat Thread
« on: March 20, 2010, 09:04:35 pm »
PLEASE PARTICIPATE, POST YOUR SHR : Here

I got:

SHR = (sitting height / standing height) * 100 = (37 / 73) * 100 = 50.7

:D

21603
Crazy Weird Analysis & Stuff :) / Re: The Squat Thread
« on: March 20, 2010, 08:53:04 pm »
nice

ya that's all i could find too: 'skelic index' = SHR

shit i need to do some measurements ill brb..

My SHR is 50,5%. Long legs...
Here comes the half-squat fiesta! :D :D :D

where did you get the "anything under 50 = very long legs"? can't find it. Or is that data from some other reference?


21604
Crazy Weird Analysis & Stuff :) / Re: The Squat Thread
« on: March 20, 2010, 08:51:53 pm »
PLEASE PARTICIPATE, POST YOUR SHR : Here

Quote
Sitting Height Ratio (SHR ).
Sitting Height = height from head to buttocks , sitting in a chair.
SHR = ( sitting height / standing height ) * 100.
From what i see in SHR the chart for adlults: 52 to 53 = average , anything under 50 = very long legs , anthing over 55 = very short legs.

LOL




HOW TO MEASURE SEATED HEIGHT: 90 Degree hip angle






JUST FOR REFERENCE:











21605
Crazy Weird Analysis & Stuff :) / Re: The Squat Thread
« on: March 20, 2010, 08:32:07 pm »
Finaly , i found a kinda useful article about leg length evaluation:

http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/7/3/1047/pdf

Long story short:
There is not much global data about leg length ratios.
The only data available is about Sitting Height Ratio (SHR ).
Sitting Height = height from head to buttocks , sitting in a chair.
SHR = ( sitting height / standing height ) * 100.
From what i see in SHR the chart for adlults: 52 to 53 = average , anything under 50 = very long legs , anthing over 55 = very short legs.





nice

ya that's all i could find too: 'skelic index' = SHR

shit i need to do some measurements ill brb..

21606
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: no bounce, need bounce
« on: March 20, 2010, 05:48:47 pm »
what do you think your DLRVJ is at right now?

21607
Introduce Yourself / Re: Adarq bio?
« on: March 20, 2010, 03:07:43 pm »

Some people cant drink milk... or take whey protein ( mike? ;) )
Did someone stop and think how shitty his training would be without milk and whey? nop! He just takes it for granted.
Human nature is greedy...

not sure what you meant here? But ya his training would be alot better if he didn't have those allergies & knee issues. However, I have been chronically "injured" my whole life, so those issues he has I would pretty much ignore. He's probably better off health-wise by not pushing through as intense as I would, but I know for myself, that the only way to success is to bulldozer over any obstacle I was facing. I mean, all of my biggest PR's in RVJ came after my debilitating hamstring tendon injury, which when reinjured, would sideline me for at least a month. That anger became some pretty intense fuel.

pc

Thats what i meant.
That everyone should try to get advantage of his own personal pros , not look to what he doesnt have (such as , say, a natural 40'' RVJ ) , but what he does have and can get him where he wants ( such as work capacity , motivation , his own gym , easy access to roidz :D , whatever... )
Were getting too off-topic though...



lol ya..

what's funny is, my "good endurance / work ethic" helped me build a good work capacity. This ability to train hard & often, allowed me to do 3 blocks of high frequency training very effectively.

  • First time I did it: 2 week squat routine, front/back squatting 4x/week, PR'd RVJ after two weeks
  • High frequency squat experiment: 1 month, PR'd DJ's, RVJ, and 1-2 step lead in RVJ's
  • High frequency block: ~2 months, my last PR's on RVJ, no vertec access so I couldn't get exact data
  • CURRENTLY: experimental high frequency system, ~1 week, so far so good


:)

pc

21608
Introduce Yourself / Re: Adarq bio?
« on: March 20, 2010, 02:50:37 pm »
i hate genetic freaks too.  ;)   but at least im on my way

Without the genetic freaks, you wouldn't have much to look up to. If all you saw were white people (or anyone) jumping 35 off a run, you'd be very close to maximum at this current point in time. You would be content. Instead, you're not content, you want 40+. So, thank the genetic freaks for motivating you.

peace



Agreed!!!
Genetic freaks = respect & admiration.



Who got me into jumping? Was it watching sub par athletes jump?

No, it was t-dub & frank yang.



Quote
Also , something we seldom think is that we may appear genetic freaks ( or just a little gifted ) to other people too.
In things like motivation , dedication , staying healthy etc.

Ya. Steve Nash is one of the best examples here. His lack of power is made up for by his work ethic. He does have "freak abilities" in other departments, such as hand eye coordination and very fast decision making.

I don't have any power genetically, instead I make up for it by having naturally good endurance, work ethic, consistency, hand eye coordination, good hand speed, and a combo of abstract/logical thinking. Also, my self-taught computer science background integrates highly with my s&c background.

Sometimes as athletes, we want to be something we aren't "meant to be". That's fine though, but it requires alot of work to overcome it. Everybody's body/physiology lends itself better to a certain type of performance, whether it is boxing, sprinting, high jumping, long distance, middle distance, archery, etc. Becoming something you're "not" takes alot of work, but it's possible to completely defy our genetics.


Quote
Some people cant drink milk... or take whey protein ( mike? ;) )
Did someone stop and think how shitty his training would be without milk and whey? nop! He just takes it for granted.
Human nature is greedy...

not sure what you meant here? But ya his training would be alot better if he didn't have those allergies & knee issues. However, I have been chronically "injured" my whole life, so those issues he has I would pretty much ignore. He's probably better off health-wise by not pushing through as intense as I would, but I know for myself, that the only way to success is to bulldozer over any obstacle I was facing. I mean, all of my biggest PR's in RVJ came after my debilitating hamstring tendon injury, which when reinjured, would sideline me for at least a month. That anger became some pretty intense fuel.

pc

21609
Introduce Yourself / Re: Adarq bio?
« on: March 20, 2010, 02:09:50 pm »
i hate genetic freaks too.  ;)   but at least im on my way

Without the genetic freaks, you wouldn't have much to look up to. If all you saw were white people (or anyone) jumping 35 off a run, you'd be very close to maximum at this current point in time. You would be content. Instead, you're not content, you want 40+. So, thank the genetic freaks for motivating you.

peace


21610
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: March 20, 2010, 02:05:44 pm »
sry to ask again, i know i asked a few times about the shoes already,  just still not sure about this what are track flats exactly?  Are all track shoes called track flats.  I found track shoes that are called ...waffles, but don't see any shoes that are called flats, so trying to figure out what exactly they go under.  thanks man

waffles are flats. waffles are track shoes without spikes.



Quote
what exactly are your goals now, trying to increase single leg jump as well as get conditioned like you used to be?

Ya basically.

To get in insane condition, while improving my jump again (double and single leg), broad jump, sprinting ability, etc.

To become a much better all around athlete, rather than just focusing on running vert.

I have to do all that without reinjuring my hamstring tendon, which is always on the verge of popping. I also have to do that while working through my sacral spine issue, which is aggravated with lots of glute work (ie sprinting/lifting). This issue (& a low back injury issue) is why I had to come up with alternative methods for getting my RVJ up, without huge increases in squat strength. Without these "issues", I might have never entered the world of frequency :)

peace man

21611
Introduce Yourself / Re: Adarq bio?
« on: March 20, 2010, 01:59:47 pm »
haha

ya that shit bugged me so bad. I can't stand all these "FastFoodAthletes". First of all, the kid claims he's been training 2 years, yet he's 15. He hasn't been "training for 2 years", he's been preparing. He's young and doesn't know anything, so even if he was "training", it's not really training, it's just working out, because he can't really understand the training process.

Unfortunately (or fortunately?), people with that mindset usually go nowhere. Always looking to the genetically gifted and whining about "why me".

You have to LIVE the training process. You have to LEARN your body. You don't just walk into a weight room, lift a few weights, and expect to transform yourself into an elite athlete.

For someone to become elite, from "weak genetics", is an insanely tough process, but it can be done. The process is organic, it relies on feedback & adjustment. It can't be store bought.


peace man :F

21612
Crazy Weird Analysis & Stuff :) / Re: GALLERIES: 40 Yard Dash
« on: March 20, 2010, 01:52:49 pm »
so his hips shouldn't be coming up higher when he brings them forward and up, about how high should they be going when trying to get to and maintain max speed, 90 degrees?

well they are pretty close to 90 degrees throughout the entire run.. his right hip seems to get to around 90 throughout, left hip doesn't. Could just be camera angle but I doubt it.

How high the knees get is going to depend alot on hip flexibility & acceleration style. Check these vids:

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vf12x5WSLN8" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vf12x5WSLN8</a>

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vf12x5WSLN8" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vf12x5WSLN8</a>

In the beginning, you see bolt getting his knees up higher than tyson. Then as they reach Max V, tyson's hips flex the least, bolt's 2nd, and asafa is #1 (highest knees).


21613
Crazy Weird Analysis & Stuff :) / Re: The Squat Thread
« on: March 20, 2010, 01:39:09 pm »
That is a very interesting topic , great work again Andrew!
Ive been in this dilemma many times...
I feel much better and stable on the half squat , and i can add weights linearly there.
In deep squats i seem to struggle in the hole , and i cant add weight linearly, it takes about 3 sessions with the same weight until i feel i can really add.
But everyone insisted deep is better so i kept trying to improve deep.
Many times i ended up doing naturally what you mentioned above... going very deep in warmups and gradually decreasing depth as the bar got heavier.

Ya that's why eventually I started half-squatting after seeing eddie's gains, but making sure I hit the walking lunges/stepups very hard. I had to stop doing stepups because my glutes were getting too big, it would aggravate an issue I have in my sacral spine.
wow, i hope we can all have that problem with the glutes

how do you feel about low vs. high step ups, like which do you like to use, and when, and why.  i feel like the higher the box the more likely it will become more hip flexor/quad movement



Well here are the variations i've used:

  • low stepups: ~12" box
  • normal stepups: ~18" box
  • high stepups: ~24" box


Keep in mind, a high stepup for someone who is < 6' might be around 22" though, we're looking at a <90 degree angle.

I implement normal stepups for the most part. In novices, I only implement normal stepups, but for intermediate/advanced, we take advantage of high & low.

In the preparatory phase, you'd use high & normal. As you transition to a peaking phase, you'd use normal & low. Low stepups of course allow for more weight, which can get pretty high for SL jumpers, so you have to be prepared & progress properly.

High stepups are hardly quad/hip flexor dominant though, if form is strict. A high stepup has similar joint angles between the hip & knee as that of a dip squat. The key is to push through the heel, actively pulling back the femur. If you let your femur shift forward, you will be attempting to overuse the quads in the movement.



As far as set/rep ranges, when trying to gain mass in the glutes/hams/quads, I prefer to do stepups using the same leg in a row, not alternating, for about 8 reps each leg. When trying to put on strength, we're looking at same leg OR alternating, using 3-5 reps each leg. When trying to produce alot of power without too much fatigue, I use only alternating stepups, of 1-3 reps each leg, singles would be done for a bunch of sets, max accelerationg of the heavy weight.

peace

21614
Bios / Re: Animals
« on: March 20, 2010, 12:37:02 pm »
greyhound looks a bit quad dominant...

were you kidding? :)

greyhound has big hamstrings on the hindlimbs, check it:


2003: Functional trade-offs in the limb muscles of dogs selected for running vs. fighting

The physical demands of rapid and economical running differ from those of physical fighting such that functional trade-offs may prevent simultaneous evolution of optimal performance in both behaviours. Here we test three hypotheses of functional trade-off by measuring determinants of limb musculoskeletal function in two breeds of domestic dogs that have undergone intense artificial selection for running (Greyhound) or fighting performance (Pit Bull). We found that Greyhounds differ from Pit Bulls in having relatively less muscle mass distally in their limbs, weaker muscles in their forelimbs than their hindlimbs, and a much greater capacity for elastic storage in the in-series tendons of the extensor muscles of their ankle joints. These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that specialization for rapid or economical running can limit fighting performance and vice versa. We suggest that functional trade-offs that prevent simultaneous evolution of optimal performance in both locomotor and fighting abilities are widespread taxonomically.




so, they have "less muscle distally", ie, the muscle belly is higher towards the origin of the bone, which means they have longer tendons, especially in their lower leg (ankles, ankle extensors specifically).

very similar to humans and elite sprinting.

peace

21615
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: March 20, 2010, 04:31:00 am »
3/19/2010

felt weird all day..

yesterday before training, i had to help my grandpa do something, which "strained my heart" somehow.. felt real weird. so it gets a bit better I train, come back/ice etc.

I wakeup and my head/heart feel real odd... bad headache all day.. body very achy like im getting the flu.

odd

was going to rest today anyway but this definitely forced me to do it.

peace

Pages: 1 ... 1439 1440 [1441] 1442 1443 ... 1504