Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - adarqui

Pages: 1 ... 1431 1432 [1433] 1434 1435 ... 1505
21481
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: March 29, 2010, 05:51:26 am »
3/28/2010

bw 165 lololoolloolool

couldn't stop pissing today, ate tons of banananas and milk, that wrecked me up


4 rounds shadow boxing:
- got two on vid
- speed was pretty good, pace was a little lower than what i wanted
- rained made me move the cam, got me a better angle tho, but then i moved it 2 other times and those angles sucked


RFI: 3 rotations


rfi pullup:
- 20,20,25

rfi pushup:
- 30,30,35

MR tuck jump:
- damn these were very bouncy
- 30,30,30
- they get your heart rate up soo much

stiff leg ankle hops:
- 10,10,10
- felt good, left achilles-area felt it a little so stopped it at 10
- got some nice bound, felt my quads finally locking up

single leg squat variation low-hops:
- 40 each leg, 3x
- make hammy burn



peace

21482
Crazy Weird Analysis & Stuff :) / Re: The Squat Thread
« on: March 29, 2010, 05:43:56 am »
50.7

thanks!




tally sorted:

43.9    (Nightfly)
47       (jumper5000)
47,8    (rip)
49,4    (miles)
49,5    (raptor)
50,5    (vag)
50.5    (LBSS)
50,7    (adarq)
50,75   (arowe)
50,75   (allstar)
51,14   (Volleybel)
51,3    (zgin)
51,39   (nba8340)
51,5    (tychver)
52       (nishan.a)
52,1    (kingfish)
54.1    (Adam)
55.2    (RJ)
55,9    (mattyg55)

21483
Program Review / Re: JackM Split
« on: March 29, 2010, 04:14:08 am »

why rhythmic? any reason? I personally prefer resetting between reps, dipping down and rising as explosively as possible.

Quote
Wednesday- Normal warmup-
high pogo jumps or something similar 3 sets of 5
Low volume (4-10) of max jumps 2LRVJ at rim/dunks
** Not sure if i should include max jumps on this day or not, any thoughts?

going to have to go by feel on that one, not sure how you will respond after that monday workout.. The dj's should have you balling but im not sure how jump squat + squat + GHR will affect it, even tho squat/ghr is light.. i'd imagine you would feel ok though, as long as hammies don't get toasted.


Quote
Friday- Normal warmup-
high pogo jumps or something similar 3 sets of 5
high volume (12-20) of max jumps at rim/dunks + ISO stim extension complexes

thoughts??

you should definitely be recovered by now.

get some dunks or PR jumps on friday man!!!!


peace

21484
Performance Training Blog / Re: Maximum Strength Effort Method
« on: March 28, 2010, 09:46:23 pm »
Nice article man. One interesting thing about that and a good example of how things sometimes get lost in translation is that's the original max effort method espoused by westside barbell, but I think most people interpret their version a bit differently. It can be tough when you read a bunch of different strength/performance texts because different researchers from different countries will often use different names and slightly different variations.  For example, the brief maximal tension method is much the same but I think you'll hear that from German researchers. I believe Bompa calls his the mxs method or something similar.

thanks mang.

Well the main difference is the rest between resp. West side's max effort days include sets of singles, doubles, or triples. They mention their ME days are extremely fatiguing etc, but from what I've found, MSEM with rest between reps is hardly that. They don't generally psyche up on ME days, which is good, but the multi-rep lifting definitely takes it's toll and requires that 72 hour recovery.

From what I see on sites/youtube, their ME method has become radically different. People want to rep shit out too. The thought of only performing singles with rest in between reps, would leave most people completely baffled. So ya, it's no wonder their ME days have changed so much. Also, they have hundreds of variations for their ME lifts. As far as performance goes, I don't see that as being a good thing. I don't even know where they got that? Accommodation can certainly happen, but there's just way too many variations of shit.

One thing I always found funny, is that WSB guys consider box jumps as shock. Well, they list it as a form of shock training. That is the furthest thing from shock that I can even think of.

Have you ever noticed that?

Louie makes some pretty funny claims, sometimes I wonder if he's a serial exaggerator. He has helped a ton of people out so I'm not trashing him, but some of the "performance" stories he mentions to promote his system, just seem unfounded.

pc man

21485
Olympic Weightlifting / Benjamin Hennequin
« on: March 28, 2010, 08:31:27 pm »
Seriously jacked legs...









Viva La France!

21486
Yeah, I wouldn't mind learning more about "methods' of fatigue management.
Would you be able to elaborate on this some more Andrew? Possibly provide some sample guidelines? or what to look for? ie When is optimal to change phases, signs of too much fatigue or not enough.

Ya I should do a better write up on it and post it, I'll get around to it. Not sure how I would structure it, at this point, since i've moved from trying to calculate those things, to basically just using "feel" to cut sessions short or to go hard etc.

If you wanted to measure fatigue created by a session, you could use the drop off method & rule of thirds:

Quote
http://inno-sport.net/Training%20Basics.htm



Ok so, I went from caring about measuring to just going by feel. I've taken enough measurements to know that, if I perform low volume + high intensity lifts, such as a squat, I will be peaking 48-72 hours after. One tool I use to make sure I'm firing on all cylinders, is a stop watch. I can't find it atm but, it's a great brand for doing the "stopwatch double click". I'll double click it in the morning a bunch of times, based on these readings I know how I will be performing that day, so it helps me measure my "freshness". If i'm getting 0.07-0.1 on most of the double clicks, then I know I will be firing on all cylinders. If i'm > 0.1, then I know I still have some level of fatigue. This could either help me delay the workout to the next day, OR do some kind of light recovery workout (such as light jumps/glute stuff etc).

So, stuff I'll use for creating a nice delayed supercompensation effect of 48-72 hours on my vert:
  • Singles, doubles, or triples on squat: dropping off on bar speed or "feeling tired"
  • 4x5 depth jumps: Check my instant RFD part I for the graphs


I'll also make use of those things, in concentration, for blocks etc, to get an overall effect. I'll post my 2-week squat routine thing tonight, that's a good example of it. I've used that routine on myself and for a few others with great results. It's just a out of nowhere really concentrated strength block with skill maintenance, then you just fly out of it for a few weeks.

As for volumnous lifting, I have no "supercompensation technique" for performance. Meaning, if someone is doing 3x5, 3x8, 4x10, etc, the focus is on hypertrophy/strength, so I'm not really looking at supercompensation performance wise. To break out of that fatigue rut in such a block, I'd use multiple sessions of MSEM (squat singles), for about say 1-2 a week for 1-2 weeks. That would effectively help break you out of that fatigue rut, in a very short period of time. Much better than all of these complete deloads I see people doing.

Sorry for not posting more, I need to do a proper write up on this stuff. Plus I have to go I'll bbl, but I'll put that 2-week squat routine thing up & the results it had with one of the people I trained.



Quote
I know in Supertraining, Siff went into concentrated loading a bit, and different 'Strengths' ie explosive, acceleration, starting, absolute, max, etc, they would all decrease for a certain time and then rebound for up to a few months, and then you keep repeating this.

Ya man.. except, Absolute/Max can actually improve, because the time it takes to perform these lifts is long. Explosive strength (accel/starting) will definitely decrease for the most part, during concentrated loading. It may spike out of nowhere during a few sessions, but then it'll drive back down. Taking advantage of that rebound is then the key. You don't necessarily have to keep repeating this, but it can be done. Concentrated loading blocks can really take it's toll, so if you don't chain them together, the key would be to NOT detrain during the next gpp/strength block etc. The quality of the work would have to be better than the last time you performed gpp/strength, can't let it regress. Chaining concentrated loading blocks is definitely possible though, I mean I basically did it when I performed my first high frequency squat experiment (1 month), then realized gains for another month or so, then went back on high frequency (new protocol) for about 2 months if I recall correctly.

peace man

21487
Well, it worked just as you wrote above for me.
At the beginning, the strenght gains transfer into vert was quite significant. I was surprised to the point I actually thought I could have focused only on lifting hard and see results despite neglecting everything else. Then my vert kinda plateaued a bit. So I went into your "power-strenght" routine, doing some stuff I never did before and cutting the volume with the weights in order to be fresh + stim two days before a dunk session and I was able to jump like never before. So, basing on my personal experience, I can only say your words are gold. Period.

thanks, I was real happy that stuff was working so well for you :F

ya I remember, you had a great string of PR's with some very nice throw downs.

Quote
Anyway, I'm actually training Upper body-core-doing calf raises right now.
 ;)

nothing more than that though.

nice..

Quote
I should have my MRI next week, so keep your fingers crossed for me.

ya man I definitely am.. hope you don't need surgery.

pc

21488
MOVIES & ENTERTAINMENT & SHeeT! / Re: Rise of the Footsoldier
« on: March 28, 2010, 04:45:33 pm »
Cool, never seen or heard of it.

I like the "snapshots" they do in film, snatch probably did it the best. It's a good technique.

21489
400m Sprinting or Shorter / Ben Johnson
« on: March 28, 2010, 05:21:19 am »
box squatting 10 years passed his prime, pretty ugly 495:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-K5An8qf1Q&feature=related#t=2m42s

21490
MOVIES & ENTERTAINMENT & SHeeT! / Re: Bronson
« on: March 28, 2010, 03:24:41 am »
Ok finally got around to watching it.. it was ok, nothing great.

blip.

21491
MOVIES & ENTERTAINMENT & SHeeT! / Re: Favorite Movies
« on: March 28, 2010, 12:20:51 am »
i thought the movie never back down was actually pretty awesome, on my list of top movies ever

i didn't even go see it in theaters or for like a year after till i saw it accidentally on tv bcs it just looks like one of those gay movies, but liked it a lot

ya it looked lame to me, but I heard it was good from a few people. If it's on tv i'll check it out.

shit, I just realized I never watched bronson, have to update that thread.

pc

21492
Article & Video Discussion / Re: Nice KellyB Interview
« on: March 28, 2010, 12:17:45 am »
how do you download it, it's not working for me?

this is just from a kb article on his higher faster sports site, the man says some fucking smart things

I heard that it was not good to squat because there is deceleration that occurs at the top of the squat that doesn't occur with the vertical jump?

Keep in mind when using exercises like the squat we're not trying to duplicate the exact execution of the vertical jump, we're just trying to strengthen the muscles involved. That's also why a deeper squat is better than a quarter or half squat. It strengthens more muscles. Besides that, by that line of logic we shouldn't walk either since there is deceleration that occurs with each stride. The body and brain are smart enough to differentiate various movements.

i dno how you dl, for me it's just right click and save in firefox.



at first i thought you were asking that, but then realized it was a q&a.

ya man, never listen to those deceleration at the top people, they are full of it.. It sounds great and everything, but it is complete mental masturbation taken to the extreme, it is not practical.

peace

21493
Bios / Re: THE ADARQUI BIO
« on: March 27, 2010, 11:12:46 pm »
that 2 handed dunk on the ultraviolet mix was sick, def. one of my favorites that you had

in those pics you are getting way above the rim, looks like a good foot

thanks man, ya I love that two hander.. my favorite dunk is in the ultraviolence mix, the one hander towards the middle, where the screen spreads out prior to it. That one felt so good.

ya, those pics are all misses though I think.. ALL of my best jumps during my dunk attempts came on misses. I'd just get up so high and try to murder the rim, the ball would end up flying out like a rocket.

The first & third pic from left are probably the highest. I need to get back up there, I miss it :F

peace man

21494
so basically
strenght base-muscle building+specific movement mastery+proper fatigue managing=success

Lack in one of those departments=FAIL

Am I forgetting something?

nope, you pretty much nailed it. There are times within a training protocol, where one of those components will be emphasized more than the others.  For example, early on strength & hypertrophy could be the primary focus, with movement prep/maintenance (reactive drills/plyo prep). If strength isn't rising significantly during this period, fatigue management will be the key. As you transition into peaking your performance, expressing the strength gained via higher intensity/lower volume training becomes the primary focus, so again, fatigue management becomes important.

Gains rely alot on how fatigue is managed, there should be some kind of overall plan. If the plan is to go hard for 4 weeks, knowing full well that performance may suffer, then following the 4 weeks, during a realization phase, one would expect to rebound significantly from that 4 week block, for at least 4 weeks, perhaps even longer depending on how concentrated the block was. A fatigue block could be 1 week, 4 weeks, 1 session, etc. One must understand that, while improving strength or adding muscle using moderate to high volume routines, performance may suffer, this could be due to RFD decreasing (due to a decrease in starting strength) or other factors such as inadequate recovery / nutrition etc. Starting strength will decrease because of how potent the multi-rep lifing stimulus is, why would the body give you everything in rep 1 when it has learned that there are 4-7 more reps left? It won't, it adapts. Type IIx fibers will shift more towards the characteristics of IIa fibers. This leads to a "slower profile". Even though this occurs, you can still actually make gains in vert, because, regardless of starting strength decreasing, peak strength is improving, and vert takes a considerable amount of time to express. Once you reduce fatigue & peak, starting strength will improve resulting in an improved RFD compared to the initial level, type IIa fibers will overshoot to type IIx fibers, and power will peak. Fatigue is going to effect speed alot more than vert, considering the importance of RFD, ground contact times & need for optimal limb quickness.


Quote
Andrew, I'm serious man, I must  stop reading your posts for a bit. If I really care about my health, I just have to.
I mean, it's not fair to be so motivating.
all of those infos, principles and concepts... damn! I'm injured, I should be patient, and all I can think about right now is "gotta start training again no matter what"

Again: not fair.

I apologize... hahaha! Can't wait to see you healthy again.

Maintain some kind of upperbody strength would be my advice. I personally would also perform leg exercises that do not hurt your knee, such as double leg glute bridges and/or calf raises. If you are planning on doing anything like that for your hips, ask your doctor first of course. There's always something we can do while injured to improve our abilities, that's just how i've always approached it.

peace man!

21495
Mixed Martial Arts / UFC: Hardy Vs GSP
« on: March 27, 2010, 09:45:57 pm »
brucelee making the worst fight pick ever, worse than my clottey over pac pick:

[9:31pm] brucelee: god
[9:31pm] brucelee: nate diaz sounds like a retarded child
[9:31pm] brucelee: dumb fucks like that never succeed in anything
[9:31pm] brucelee: markham by whatever he wants
[9:31pm] brucelee: markham by whatever he wants
[9:32pm] blackbart: brucelee is wrong
[9:32pm] ABRAHAM: uh
[9:32pm] ABRAHAM: nate diaz is a tough fuck
[9:32pm] brucelee: markham by decisuion
[9:32pm] ABRAHAM: diaz by sub round 2
[9:32pm] ABRAHAM: so stfu
[9:32pm] brucelee: markham by decisuion
[9:33pm] blackbart: no way markham wins by sub
[9:33pm] brucelee: no decision
[9:33pm] brucelee: tough street of stockton cali
[9:33pm] brucelee: rofl
[9:34pm] brucelee: that place is some safe ass suburb
[9:34pm] brucelee: i live 30 minutes from it
[9:34pm] ABRAHAM: hah
[9:34pm] ABRAHAM: im sure its got very badsareas
[9:34pm] ABRAHAM: areas
[9:34pm] ABRAHAM: it was in a snoop song
[9:34pm] blackbart: did you go by the diaz residence??
[9:34pm] ABRAHAM: ....
[9:35pm] blackbart: they smoke weed & kill people
[9:35pm] brucelee: rofl...
[9:35pm] brucelee: its near oakland
[9:35pm] ABRAHAM: u should go hidden cam them, watch purpdank giving them bj's
[9:35pm] brucelee: markham didnt make weight
[9:35pm] brucelee: THIS IS OVER
[9:35pm] brucelee: THIS IS OVER
[9:36pm] ABRAHAM: hes a bitch thars y
[9:36pm] brucelee: markham is walking around at 230 lbs
[9:36pm] ABRAHAM: thats
[9:36pm] blackbart: 177.. not even close
[9:36pm] brucelee: markham is walking around at 230 lbs
[9:36pm] ABRAHAM: hes gonna get choked to sleep
[9:36pm] ABRAHAM: ......
[9:36pm] brucelee: its over for nate diaz
[9:36pm] brucelee: his career is over
[9:36pm] brucelee: I CHANGE MY DECISION
[9:36pm] brucelee: TO KNOCKOUT
[9:36pm] brucelee: MARKHAM RD1 KNOCKOUT
[9:36pm] ABRAHAM: lol
[9:36pm] brucelee: MARKHAM RD1 KNOCKOUT
[9:36pm] ABRAHAM: sleep
[9:37pm] brucelee: predictions in
[9:37pm] brucelee: ok
[9:37pm] brucelee: all in
[9:37pm] brucelee: too late
[9:37pm] brucelee: no change
[9:37pm] brucelee: HE DIDNT EVEN PHASE MARKHAM
[9:37pm] brucelee: with all his power
[9:37pm] brucelee: god markham looks like some stupid newbie
[9:37pm] brucelee: what the fuck
[9:38pm] brucelee: he fights like a wuss
[9:38pm] ABRAHAM: hahahahah
[9:38pm] ABRAHAM: hes gettuing raped
[9:38pm] ABRAHAM: hahahahaahahahah
[9:38pm] ABRAHAM: ggggG
[9:38pm] brucelee: wt
[9:38pm] ABRAHAM: HAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAH
[9:38pm] ABRAHAM: AHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
[9:38pm] brucelee: wtf
[9:38pm] ABRAHAM: AAAHHAAHAHAHHAAHHAAHAHAHAHHAAHAH
[9:38pm] brucelee: wtf
[9:38pm] blackbart: whyy
[9:38pm] brucelee: GOD
[9:38pm] brucelee: THIS GUY
[9:38pm] brucelee: NEEDS TO GET CUT
[9:38pm] brucelee: NEEDS TO GET CUT
[9:38pm] brucelee: NEEDS TO GET CUT
[9:39pm] ABRAHAM: AJAAJAJAJAJAJAJ
[9:39pm] ABRAHAM: AHAAHHAAHAHAHAHAH
[9:39pm] brucelee: omfg...
[9:39pm] ABRAHAM: AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
[9:39pm] brucelee: are yoU KIDDING ME
[9:39pm] ABRAHAM: AHHAHAHHAAHAHAHHAAHAAH
[9:39pm] brucelee: ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME
[9:39pm] ABRAHAM: AAAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAH
[9:39pm] brucelee: god....
[9:39pm] ABRAHAM: AHAHAAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHHA
[9:39pm] brucelee: what the FUCK
[9:39pm] ABRAHAM: AHAAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHHAA
[9:39pm] ABRAHAM: AHHAHAAHHAAHAHAHAHAHHAH
[9:39pm] brucelee: OK WE WERE BOTH WRONG
[9:39pm] brucelee: OK WE WERE BOTH WRONG
[9:40pm] brucelee: rd1 knockout
[9:40pm] brucelee: TKO
[9:40pm] brucelee: TKO
[9:40pm] brucelee: u said sub
[9:40pm] brucelee: we were bothj wrong
[9:40pm] ABRAHAM: hhaahahaahahaahahahaahhaaahaha
[9:40pm] blackbart: not me i was right
[9:40pm] ABRAHAM: u = fail
[9:40pm] brucelee: hahaha
[9:40pm] brucelee: YOu didnt even make a prediction blackbart
[9:40pm] brucelee: god markham is a joke
[9:40pm] blackbart: yes i did
[9:40pm] ABRAHAM: best nate ive ever seen
[9:40pm] ABRAHAM: .........
[9:41pm] blackbart: yeah his stand up lookd good, more on par with nicks
[9:41pm] blackbart: i used to think nick had way better stand up than nate
[9:41pm] ABRAHAM: ya
[9:41pm] ABRAHAM: more power................
[9:43pm] brucelee: THAT FUCKING WUSS FUCK
[9:43pm] brucelee: markham
[9:43pm] brucelee: god..
[9:43pm] brucelee: that was such a waste of time
[9:43pm] ABRAHAM: nate could beat gsp.......
[9:43pm] brucelee: hahahaha]
[9:43pm] ABRAHAM: im serious
[9:43pm] brucelee: hahahaha]
[9:43pm] ABRAHAM: dude
[9:43pm] brucelee: hahahaha]
[9:43pm] brucelee: hahahaha]
[9:43pm] ABRAHAM: he would submit gsp
[9:43pm] ABRAHAM: for sure
[9:43pm] ABRAHAM: im not kidding
[9:43pm] brucelee: HAHHAAHHAHA
[9:43pm] brucelee: HAHHAAHHAHA

Pages: 1 ... 1431 1432 [1433] 1434 1435 ... 1505