Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - adarqui

Pages: 1 ... 1404 1405 [1406] 1407 1408 ... 1504
21076
Pics, Videos, & Links / This guy is so strong : David Morgan
« on: May 08, 2010, 11:35:26 pm »
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHEkokQSGmU" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHEkokQSGmU</a>

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHEkokQSGmU&feature=related

21077
Mixed Martial Arts / Mariusz Pudzianowski's second fight
« on: May 08, 2010, 05:46:47 pm »
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnSx4SfX5Hk" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnSx4SfX5Hk</a>

21078
Mixed Martial Arts / Re: UFC 113
« on: May 08, 2010, 04:36:20 pm »
kimbo ko mitrione 2, kos by sub in 2, shogun by ko in 3.

21079
Nutrition & Supplementation / Re: water???
« on: May 08, 2010, 03:24:20 pm »
how do you feel about this? has me confused now ???
http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2008/07/wellness-water-8x8-myth.html

nice find, but what are you confused on specifically?

i've never bought into the 8 x 8oz hype, ever.. mostly because I drink milk, that contains alot of water, and food contains alot of water. So i mean you can get away with 5 glasses or so, and you'll get the rest of it from other sources.

The dehydration thing is big, i actually feel more energetic/stronger/powerful when im 'slightly dehydrated'.. tons of dehydration studies show no effect in boxing, i have a few in the boxing studies thread in peer review subforum.

That 'you're dehydrated when you're thirsty' shit is always such bs too... That's like saying if you're hungry, you're starving.

I liked the article. You know what, i've never seen this 8x8 crap in any workplace i've been in though, odd.

cya man

21080
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: May 08, 2010, 09:46:03 am »


5/7/2010

hands/forearms still toast..

early session:

15 rounds heavy bag:
- alot better
- still got tons of work to do but felt alot better..
- here's a vid of rounds 1, 2, & 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alV8WrtCC50

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alV8WrtCC50" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alV8WrtCC50</a>



night session:

2 hours of bball dribbling/layups straight:
- god i was dead.. good work







pc


did they let you do the 5 dollars/ day thing?

i have to go mondya to see.. to talk with the guy.

pc man

21081
Boxing / Re: Boxing vids from my "free week at ATT"
« on: May 08, 2010, 05:37:21 am »
this vid is alot better than the others.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alV8WrtCC50" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alV8WrtCC50</a>

21082
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: May 08, 2010, 05:23:05 am »


5/7/2010

hands/forearms still toast..

early session:

15 rounds heavy bag:
- alot better
- still got tons of work to do but felt alot better..
- here's a vid of rounds 1, 2, & 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alV8WrtCC50

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alV8WrtCC50" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alV8WrtCC50</a>



night session:

2 hours of bball dribbling/layups straight:
- god i was dead.. good work







pc

21083
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: May 08, 2010, 05:16:27 am »
you must suck at checking your PMs cuz i left you one too..

ya but when i read that i got back to you :D

21084
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: May 07, 2010, 06:07:48 pm »
man that 35 inches without lifting is interesting indeed.
would you mind to give a deeper insight when you got enough time, andrew?

BTW, you got a pm

ya check this post: http://www.adarq.org/forum/progress-journals-experimental-routines/natho%27s-journal/msg5443/#msg5443

a few other posts on there too.. ill check pm now.

21085
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: May 07, 2010, 05:57:10 pm »
Cool vid man. Your editing skills are NICE!!  ;D

thanks man!

What program do you use? Youre a mac man right?

adobe after effects.. it crashes alot but it's the best editor you can get.

21086
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: May 07, 2010, 05:07:16 pm »
adarq, considering you got up to a pretty impressive RVJ (36 inches i believe?) , How much higher do you think you could have reached.  Considering IMO you didnt even come close to maximizing your squat/lower body strength, you obviously werent any where close to peaking...?

i got ~39 for MAX.. I hit ~35-36 in front of adam, on some warmup jumps before it started raining, at this court in sunrise. I hit 36" on vertec also, I just never dropped vid because you couldn't see it move, but I have a pic. I was jumping alot higher months after that, in relation to rim jumps. I didn't have vertec then cause I had quit MSC.

Well, I had to be very careful pushing up my squat because of my lower back injury from way back so.. But I did get 325 for a single or whatever, above parallel, in my squatting style, during my last high frequency block. I'd say I was pretty close to peaked because training was taking alot out of me, if I relaxed on my training my RVJ would drop fast.

Also, i have a sacral spine issue, which gets aggravated.. I technically need surgery on it, some big operation.. So, when my glutes grow like crazy, it aggravates it bad and I can barely sit down etc, this mostly happened when my stepups/lunges were going up like crazy, but it did happen on squat too, such as when i hit 255-265x5 after all my 20 rep squatting sessions. 20 rep squats also f'd it up.

So I had crap I had to work around... :/    I don't think i could have gotten much higher due to the fact that I always had to work around something.. injuries + sacral spine thing really kept me from going at it hardcore.. that's why i did shit like frequency etc, trying to find other ways to peak my power without having to focus on lifting heavy with so much volume.

pc man

Really?
I'd like to know what the proper definition is to you, 'cause looking at my dictionary I found your name and photo under "hardcore"...


haha! ya well, i'd call myself hardcore when i start fighting.. need to do that shit.

:D

pc

21087
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: May 07, 2010, 05:05:42 pm »
do you think you will ever be able to overcome and push your squat/RVJ past previous marks?

nah coz i dont think im going to lift.. i'd rather try and build my hops back without any lifting, somehow... hehe :)

i'd be happy with no-weights 35" RVJ..

pc

21088
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: May 07, 2010, 02:07:57 pm »
adarq, considering you got up to a pretty impressive RVJ (36 inches i believe?) , How much higher do you think you could have reached.  Considering IMO you didnt even come close to maximizing your squat/lower body strength, you obviously werent any where close to peaking...?

i got ~39 for MAX.. I hit ~35-36 in front of adam, on some warmup jumps before it started raining, at this court in sunrise. I hit 36" on vertec also, I just never dropped vid because you couldn't see it move, but I have a pic. I was jumping alot higher months after that, in relation to rim jumps. I didn't have vertec then cause I had quit MSC.

Well, I had to be very careful pushing up my squat because of my lower back injury from way back so.. But I did get 325 for a single or whatever, above parallel, in my squatting style, during my last high frequency block. I'd say I was pretty close to peaked because training was taking alot out of me, if I relaxed on my training my RVJ would drop fast.

Also, i have a sacral spine issue, which gets aggravated.. I technically need surgery on it, some big operation.. So, when my glutes grow like crazy, it aggravates it bad and I can barely sit down etc, this mostly happened when my stepups/lunges were going up like crazy, but it did happen on squat too, such as when i hit 255-265x5 after all my 20 rep squatting sessions. 20 rep squats also f'd it up.

So I had crap I had to work around... :/    I don't think i could have gotten much higher due to the fact that I always had to work around something.. injuries + sacral spine thing really kept me from going at it hardcore.. that's why i did shit like frequency etc, trying to find other ways to peak my power without having to focus on lifting heavy with so much volume.

pc man

21089
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: May 07, 2010, 01:59:39 pm »
Cool vid man. Your editing skills are NICE!!  ;D

thanks man!

21090
*i bow to you*

data FTW.

im having a problem reading the dates, non-englishness.. but the worst is after the 4th deload, your progression started way too low (in regards to max squat/BW or max squat). Had you started out heavier, you might have reached a new peak, then everything would have been good.

what happened after that fourth deload?

Man , good eyes!!!
2nd deload = not deload , its the end of summer lifting , May 18 , next entry is September 17 , 4 months without lifting.
4th deload = same thing , December 9 to March 10 , 3 months no lifting.
My 2 big yoyos , with obvious strength loss , never again!!!

As for progress after 4th "deload" , what changed is :
Until then , 5RM squat was done in the upper body days, was just building up to 5RM, Then replaced that with MSEM , so the listed weights are actualy the heaviest of my 4x6 sets. You can see that the same time the MSEM graph appears, and it is equal or above with the previous 5RM's.
One more note : the 5RM squat is real , what i lifted. The 1RM is projected calculation. So some days i might lift heavier for 1-2 reps shorter , that doesnt show on the 5RM line but it shows on the 1RM estimation. Thats obvious on last workout before last deload , 5RM squat goes up from 105 to 115 but 1RM down from 130 to 129. Thats because 115 was 6RM and 115 was 4RM

So ya ,everything interesting in that graph and every suspicious graph behaviour, you got it right! :D



whew, im glad i got it right! hah

thats why journals/data tracking are so important, never again will you make that mistake.. vertical will defy age :)

pc

Pages: 1 ... 1404 1405 [1406] 1407 1408 ... 1504