20881
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
i understand what your saying i guess i mean then that i don't think we are close to our genetic limits yet
what is a side-plant ???http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0kHeTJVHQQ
check that first dunk.. 2nd one is too etc.. see how i plant sideways and really cause a major deceleration, i "sit sideways into it".
peace
ah the good old days. When you werent soft
can't argue that heheh..Your no lifting outlook is really tempting though, sort of wanna try it when Im finally healthy in 2-4 weeks.

VJB WORKS... and i mean it WORKS!!!
its not just how many inches you gain.
most important is that it gives you the most solid training base.
as for gains... got my running VJ from ~24'' to ~32'' in ~2 years, starting at 33 years old. need i say more?
learning from adarq on irc >>>>>>>>> vjb
Well talking personaly with someone that knows your training background etc cant be compared with a VJ programm on the market. 2 totally different things.
Learning fro adarq on irc/forum day by day = personal coaching!
ya i know, but zgin din look like he caught it haha.
humility goes a long way, and also, sometimes poking fun isnt as easy to read as in real life...

what is a side-plant ???
hmmm... does it matter which way i go into my double legged RVJ?
cos i just realised that i have no fixed way, sometimes i go in L-R (at this point both feet are together,gathering to go up)-jump, sometimes its R-L-jump.
considering i jump off my left leg for my SLRVJ, would it be more advantageous for me to fix it one method?
funny thing is, while i jump off my left, i have a feeling my right leg is stronger and more stable haha. puzzling![]()
jump looks pretty explosive
ya i hate wen link talks about jumping form. its stupid
Hey adarqui,
thanks for your thoughts again. I will let the information sink in a bit but thanks to you I already have a general idea about how the next block will have to be designed.
One question came up regarding this:
ya it definitely would be, but i would use it much less than variant 1, for sure.. maybe in a 4:1 ratio of variant-1 to variant-2, for example.
Why do you think that the variant I posted needs to be done in a less frequent manner? The only difference I see is the fourth set with a heavy single. Do you think that this would have such a dramatic effect on fatigue?
I'm not a member of wgf so I thought I'd let you know here.
I was reading over your debate on wgf.
I thought alex's point and your points were both good.
Many questions arose from the debate.
I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts.
Obviously boxers are the best punchers and have the best punching technique. But would they be even better if they did extremes for punching?
Because they are pro boxers there is already a pre-selection for punching talent. Maybe the boxers that make it are the lucky ones born with perfect technique. Perhaps for other boxers iso-extremes would have helped them?
or, maybe all of the practice punching led to perfect technique as the body adapted to the demands?
I read something from a coach where he was talking about glute development and the best way to do that was by doing sprints...the body would adapt to using the glutes properly. Is this possibly similar (i.e. all of the practice leading to the body's search for efficiency and thus perfect technique arising)?
haha u scared of me vag?