196
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Today I've eaten: current weight 130lbs
Nutritional drink ( boost plus )
TGIF- chicken breast and mash potatoes and a slice of cheese cake
Another TGIF- chicken breast and mash potatoes 2 chicken tenders
A banana
it is not better to eat every 3 hours compared to eating 3 times a day!
diet-wise, fast food is not bad or worse than other food. it's usually more calorie dense and you can overeat easier. if you know that and don't go crazy with it you can eat "bad food" here and there. (health-wise is a different thing).
oh, and: don't do p90x !
Yeah exactly, the ideal athlete eats McDonald's three times a day with no snacks and no supplements.
Ok, this is the problem with online stuff. You get people contradicting one another with no support. I will get some studies up here next. However, so I'm clear, it seems like you are advocating 1. Eating fast food vs. whole foods doesn't matter and 2. eat 3 times a day and not snack or eat every three waking hours.
As far as the junk food, Adarq even has something up talking about putting junk in your body and "eating like an athlete" I just have to find it. I agree she can definitely eat fast food especially if she needs to get some calories in there, I am saying all else equal, it's best to eat whole foods unless you can't get the calories. Seriously can't believe you would advocate eating 3x a day rather than more frequently -"athletes" eat constantly - about 1,000,000 studies supporting this, I will get them just at work right now. If you really want to put on some weight with good calories, you can go with a cytogainer and put on as much weight as you want. It's a 2,000 calorie supplement.
Also, I said a NUMBER of times that p90x isn't the only program out there, I was suggesting it as something to help tone and work on some general strength which is what many women want. If you guys have a program maybe you could share it with her instead of saying "not this" "not that" I'm just suggesting what many women want - getting toned and getting a little more strength. Also, if you actually read what she wrote, she says she has a newborn, and one month of lifting experience, so maybe it would be more convenient to work out at home and easier to not perform technical lifts. Anyway, you can do this for upper body below...maybe you guys will say not to do this too and provide no solutions.
http://www.adarq.org/forum/lancests-performance-blog/effective-and-time-effecient-upper-body-
then click on "Effective and Time Effecient Upper body *(and lower) Training for Athletes"
There is some good information in there. Also, you should read over this, it's good for skinny athletes and will give a template you can follow.
http://www.defrancostraining.com/articles/38-articles/64-westside-for-skinny-bastards-part1.html
And, Raptor, you say were saying "if you want to become an athelete you better train like one" - although I agree, she actually said "I'm looking to get a stronger upper body" which could freaking mean anything. It could mean she wants to get a little stronger and is mostly concerned about tone, which is exactly why I was asking her what her goals were. I do not assume everyone has the same goals - that's why I was trying to ask her her goals. P90x is great for toning and easy to follow, so if that's what she wanted I do not see the issue with it. In terms of the workout I was asking about what access to equipment she had in terms of a gym, squat rack, all that.
And, so we're clear, I just wanted to help this person, not argue.
barbell is way harder than vests + db's, not even close.
Good point. Wonder why he/she wasn't holding that pole over her head or on the shoulders.
I was about to say that's not really that impressive, I thought he had only one weight vest on, but 3? WTF? You can't know how much they weigh though...
its 305lb all.
just read the youtube description...
I did bss with a 230 lbs barbell, i think it's harder than using vests and dbs...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUmtj15rk9I < this is 220 lbs but i also did them with 230
imho barbell makes it easier because of the better weight distribution and therefore more balance
Are you crazy boy? What's easier to stabilize, a weight close to the ground or a weight far away from the ground?
I was about to say that's not really that impressive, I thought he had only one weight vest on, but 3? WTF? You can't know how much they weigh though...
its 305lb all.
just read the youtube description...
I did bss with a 230 lbs barbell, i think it's harder than using vests and dbs...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUmtj15rk9I < this is 220 lbs but i also did them with 230
Purity and the process of purifying matters.
Isn't casein hydrolosate even FASTER absorbing than whey? Thoughts on that, guys?
If you can only do one I would do a whey protein isolate or whey mix (isolate + concentrate). Whey is the most basic supplement, a quick digesting protein to take after your workouts or to "supplement" with your meals throughout the day.
Creatine is a bit more advanced imo, the average broski who works out doesn't need to take it but it is good for athletes. Creatine increases ATP production which is utilized during anaerobic activities, such as... vert, low rep weightlifting, sprinting, etc. Contrary to popular broscience you don't need to "cycle" creatine, you can take it forever, just like whey protein. You should notice some nice strength increases if you start creatine.
why?
...
just get the cheapest one with a good taste that you like!
Pure concentrate is the lowest grade shit. Plus the fact that the study where they found a bunch of protein powders had traces of metal in them, most of those were the popular concentrates (Muscle Milk etc).