Adarq.org

That makes us two with a blown back. In my case, it was the power clean (which I will ditch from my workouts until I can at least do front squats properly (with the bar on the shoulders)).

I have no idea. What he probably means is the guy that can turn on all the muscles (generate tension) and turn off all the muscles (generate relaxation) the fastest is going to be the most successful.

So I guess he means alternating great tension with great relaxation in one's training. Sprint maximally, then relax and shake your legs and focus on relaxing.

Obviously, this is my subjective interpretation of that statement.

High bar?

Thanks man!

I plan to write on a few more subjects and then get into the practical field of how to actually train. I've sketched out 3 sheets of ideas to write about.

I'd like to talk about the core, the tendons, the calves, frequency vs volume, partial ROM movements and actual training templates.

Well yeah... I mean it makes sense to isolate the muscles in order to compare them. But it has to be the same machine with the same settings.

Otherwise, leverage differences in different machines, the number of wheels for the machine's cable etc might give erroneous results.

Yeah but in that movement both the glutes and the hamstrings fire. So you're basically comparing a group of two muscles with the quads. How do you know how much contribution the hamstrings give?

Really? How did you determine this?

a few of the RL DLRVJ felt pretty good, interestingly.