Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - adarqui

Pages: 1 ... 1220 1221 [1222] 1223 1224 ... 1504
18316
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: November 15, 2010, 11:52:36 pm »
some pics from today before i go do some ape-shit high rep squatting/curling, 9'11 rim.. first head-height pic in there felt like my highest jump, and one of those missed dunks linked early on felt real high, i'll probably include it, lots of flizoat.













some other weak pics:

http://imgur.com/E8U4C.png

http://imgur.com/hy7ac.png

http://imgur.com/fyOhD.png

http://imgur.com/6aYE7.png


18317
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: November 15, 2010, 11:48:02 pm »
i agree with Flander :D

Darq, i think you should take into account that your tendons/ligaments/cartilaginous tissues and fascia(correct me if i'm wrong) heal and take longer to recover than the muscles. my point is, you might feel ok in terms of soreness and cns fatigues, but that doesn't mean nothing is happening

just a thought..

You're giving advice to a brick wall, fellas.

lol

18318
Article & Video Discussion / Re: Unilaterals Make You Weaker
« on: November 15, 2010, 08:40:05 pm »
you're using a bicycle analogy, when we're talking about heavy barbell unilateral training?

<-- confused

My point with that analogy was that transfer depends on the level of the lifter and that very untrained people will have a lot of carryover from unilaterals to squats - just like they will have a lot of carryover from pretty much any hard physical activity, probably even from riding a bicycle.

so, say you have an intermediate lifter who is experienced with all lifts in question, you pre-test squat, then hit barbell walking lunges, barbell bss, barbell stepup hard for 12 weeks, with significant increases on each lift, say 30% increases on each lift, you don't think he would get much transfer to squat? if not, why? you're still learning to activate more mu's, activate the fastest mu's, achieving hypertrophy, improving strength in other things that matter like core etc, improving strength/hypertrophy in all muscle groups related to squat, reducing inhibitory mechanisms, improving things like neural drive, increasing strength/composition of other biological structures such as bone/tendon, improving intermuscular coordination that is somewhat similar to squatting, etc... EDIT: plus you still have very heavy barbells on your back.

There are holes in that argumentation, for example that we are starting from the assumption, that an intermediate lifter can gain 30% on say his 1rm lunges weight from training with unilaterals alone which I can imagine will be hard for an already reasonably strong person.
But even if he can, without at least maintaining coordination and specific strength for the squat, I don't think the unilaterals will have direct carryover. I could imagine that with several weeks of training the squat again, that it would progress rather well since some of the mentioned adaptations might have taken place, but honestly, I don't even think this rate of unusually fast progress (for an intermediate that is) would last for long. I think you are overestimating the potential regarding the adaptation from training with unilaterals exclusively - at least for intermediate trainees - and underestimating the importance of maintaining squat efficiency and specificity of the loads that will be handled with that. Since you mention core strength especially - I do in fact think that strength in the trunk musculature would suffer quite a bit and that suddenly testing a squat max after weeks of unilaterals will hit the athlete quite unprepared.

my point is that unilaterals exclusively, when done with barbells, with the focus of progressive overload & max intensity, will not lead in as much strength loss as one would think. shit i have to go hah dunk .


Quote
Of course, I am speculating here. Maybe you can convince me to make a point and try unilaterals exclusively for 4 weeks with a pre and post test of squat 1 rm. But right now I am pretty convinced that this is a horrible idea.

do two tests, pre/post testing after 4 weeks lunges, and pre/post testing after 4 weeks of bicycle.




Quote
that an intermediate lifter can gain 30% on say his 1rm lunges weight from training with unilaterals alone which I can imagine will be hard for an already reasonably strong person.

?? then how does a reasonably strong person increase squat 30%? how else would you improve your unilaterals, other than unilaterals alone? it's just progressive overload and of course an intermediate lifter could improve their 1RM lunge 30% by using unilaterals alone.

peace

18319
Article & Video Discussion / Re: Unilaterals Make You Weaker
« on: November 15, 2010, 08:32:10 pm »
Well he didn't said "ditch the unilaterals all together". I think that article is more aimed at "functional guy X" who swears by the unilateral. That's why I said I agree... do your heavy stuff first and go unilateral second. Squat + Lunge. Squat + One-leg deadlift. Deadlift + BSS. Etc.

i agree that unilaterals for the most part should be kept to assistance, but still, you could have sessions which focus primarily on them.. they can be effective for strength/power in singles or in sets of 3 each leg, or for hypertrophy in sets of 5-8 each leg.

for example, say you have a session which focuses on heavy squatting one day (+ assistance) and heavy unilaterals another day (to not burn yourself out squatting). if your squat is pretty high, that could be very effective, especially for people who ascribe to the very low frequency squatting ideology.

pc

18320

THE RATIO TECHNIQUE BIG EXPERIMENT:






BLUE = current
RED = pending
GREEN = done



15 November 2010

PHASE 1 - Cycle 3 - Stim Workout

Bodyweight@session : ~197
Injuries/aches : none
Soreness : none

MSEM SQUATS ( rest between reps ~45sec , rest between sets ~4min ):
3x1 : 220 - 220 - 220 ( +11lbs in all reps )
3x1 : 242 - 242 - 242 ( +11lbs in all reps )
3x1 : 275 - 275 - 275 ( +22lbs in all reps )
-220 sub-parallel , 242 parallel , 275 half-squats.

MSEM BSS ( at smith machine , rest between reps ~20sec , rest between sets ~3'' )
3x1@220
3x1@286 , ( +22lbs , PR )
-Dumbass , wanted to start with 242 but counted wrong!
-220 was too light , doing them almost explosively and rest was ~10 sec.

SINGLE LEG STANDING CALVE RAISES:
1x5@110
1x5@132
1x5@154
1x5@176



---- END OF PHASE 1 ----


nice way to the end phase, closing in on 315 BSS, beaZt.

18321
a pot by Tam Beazt:

Diet has been going well over the past few weeks, up until yesterday and today. Been under 30g of carb's per day, except sunday where i carb up, and i feel great. Diet consists of eggs, steak, hamburgers ( home made), peanut butter, cheese and Broccoli. The last two Saturdays i have felt "light" and jumped higher than ever off two feet. Screwed up today as well as yesterday (reefed day) as i have a cold and can stomach beef or eggs so been eating junk all day. Although i do look bloated and abs are faded away, got crazy vascularity and pumps in my delts and arms lol.

18322
Introduce Yourself / Re: for 45" running vert
« on: November 15, 2010, 07:31:20 pm »


ya i'd start phasing in some lower level reactive work & decreasing overall lifting volume, but keeping intensity high.. that's just general concept, I can help you put together something for sure, give me an idea of what you're thinking too, because I know you're a work-a-holic and it's hard for you to stay away from the gym.. hah




nice, overall I like it.. I mean your main concern now is to maintain lean mass while reducing bodyfat, and heal those knees up, so the routine you listed is pretty good, and given your work capacity, easily doable.. I would make a few changes, don't know if you like them, but just simple changes to not stress your knees further.



Monday: BASKETBALL-STUFF + Hamstring/legs/anything to strengthen legs without pressuring knees
Tuesday: shoulders/tris/
Wednesday: {LIGHT-INTERVAL-SPRINTS OR BASKETBALL-STUFF} + Hamstring/legs/anything to strengthen legs without pressuring knees
Thursday: back stuff/ optional basketball
Friday: light cardio/off
Saturday: {LIGHT-INTERVAL-SPRINTS OR BASKETBALL-STUFF} + Hamstring/legs/anything to strengthen legs without pressuring knees
Sunday: rest.


all i did was throw in some light interval sprinting before the lowerbody sessions.. beyond just being cardio & improving your "dynamic movement" work capacity, it'll help you really warmup great for lower, giving your knees an extra break. I would keep the sprints under 70%, and just non stop sprint out ~20 yards, relaxed deceleration, walk back nice and relaxed, repeat, for 20-30min. Work on really pull-running instead of push running, in case that's an issue.. really get the glutes/hams involved.



One more thing you could do, to help maintain more upper lean mass, would be to hit back/shoulders/tri's/bi's in the same session, switching the schedule up slightly to provide adequate rest between those sessions:



Monday: BASKETBALL-STUFF + Hamstring/legs/anything to strengthen legs without pressuring knees
Tuesday: shoulders/tris + back/bi's (supersets?)
Wednesday: {LIGHT-INTERVAL-SPRINTS OR BASKETBALL-STUFF} + Hamstring/legs/anything to strengthen legs without pressuring knees
Thursday: light cardio/off
Friday: shoulders/tris + back/bi's (supersets?)
Saturday: {LIGHT-INTERVAL-SPRINTS OR BASKETBALL-STUFF} + Hamstring/legs/anything to strengthen legs without pressuring knees
Sunday: rest.


nothing major in the modifications, but hope that helps a bit..

peace

I like the second layout....and those sprints would have to be shorter then the length of a bball court due to that's what I got available.  This past Saturday I rested the squat (didn't do them) and knees are feeling pretty good today (monday).

saturday:
strict press
95x10>>front raises with 45lb bar
105x10
185x3
205x2-new record I think...didn't want to strain for a third.
dbl lateral shoulder raises
20'sx15
20'sx15
20'sx15
barbell shurgs
135x40
135x20
255x10
345x10
255x10
barbell rows
135x5
235x8
325x5-looser form
235x20-last few got loose.
farmers walk
100x250ft
200x180ft
 :strong:

ya just do 3/4th court sprints.. or half court.. its just interval so.

glad the knees are doing good!
pc

18323
Basketball / Re: haneef munir young hollywood keeps kissing the rim
« on: November 15, 2010, 06:38:32 pm »
I don't really agree about the similarities. I mean, studying closely things about plants etc, I've discovered that the best jumpers are those that drop quite a bit on the penultimate step in a two footed plant as well. You're currently not doing that very good in my eyes. To me, that's the part you could improve sooooo much. Lean more on a side and "be like water" to quote Bruce Lee.

I've also seen on Vince two days ago in his plant how well he puts that right leg and rotates on it, and keeps on rotating until he puts the left leg on the floor too. He's kind of unique in that regard since the people I usually see - they rotate as well but they are "stiff". He just lets his limbs be elastic and "bend". It's really hard to explain what I mean, but it's easily visible. And no, I'm not that crazy, mind you.

So to me, if you'd look a bit into the penultimate and tweak on that, you'd get higher.

that "lean" you speak of, ya i'm not doing it that much lately, it is something I do naturally but strength work interfered.. if you look at my jumps following intense depth jump blocks, i always re-gain that lean, for example:

here's an old vid that demonstrates it real good from front angle, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g72fqPlL3eM

i'm not anywhere near that right now.. i agree, i'd get up higher if my body started doing that again, maybe after this upcoming shock block (hopefully) it'll come back..

pc

18324
Article & Video Discussion / Re: Unilaterals Make You Weaker
« on: November 15, 2010, 06:34:33 pm »
it'll still have transfer.. regardless, if you gain strength/mass unilaterally, it will transfer, it's just that squat/lunge is such a different movement that of course it won't transfer perfectly, that's why the article bugs me, of course you're going to have to re-learn the squat a bit, but of course it will transfer... For example, if you weren't hurt, and focused on doing some massive unilaterals, barbell walking lunge, barbell bss, barbell stepup, and you did this for 12 weeks, comparing a pre-test squat 1RM vs post-test, there'd be no doubt that post-test squat would be way higher.

Not doubting your experience or knowledge, but I find that pretty hard to believe. In my opinion you could be happy to squat the same weight after 12 weeks of unilaterals - very happy - but certainly you would not squat more than before except the case that you were pretty untrained in the squat before. You can take a rank novice, measure what he squats on day 1 and then let him ride the bicycle for 12 weeks a lot and measure his squat after and it might have increased. But that does not mean that cycling does have a big transfer to squatting for anyone but a relatively untrained individual (untrained in the squat that is).

you're using a bicycle analogy, when we're talking about heavy barbell unilateral training?

<-- confused

so, say you have an intermediate lifter who is experienced with all lifts in question, you pre-test squat, then hit barbell walking lunges, barbell bss, barbell stepup hard for 12 weeks, with significant increases on each lift, say 30% increases on each lift, you don't think he would get much transfer to squat? if not, why? you're still learning to activate more mu's, activate the fastest mu's, achieving hypertrophy, improving strength in other things that matter like core etc, improving strength/hypertrophy in all muscle groups related to squat, reducing inhibitory mechanisms, improving things like neural drive, increasing strength/composition of other biological structures such as bone/tendon, improving intermuscular coordination that is somewhat similar to squatting, etc... EDIT: plus you still have very heavy barbells on your back.

riding a bike doesn't do any of that, so i don't get the comparison?

peace

18325
Basketball / Re: haneef munir young hollywood keeps kissing the rim
« on: November 15, 2010, 05:53:57 pm »
just comparing his jump vs mine, he's RL and i'm LR so.. all of his head height jumps are slowed down so I can't see how he compares in terms of speed/GCT, even though its a 30fps it would be slightly interesting.

anyway, biggest diff is arm swing on the way up imo, but overall, pretty similar looking jump.. oh and uh, 20" in vert.














18326
Article & Video Discussion / Re: Unilaterals Make You Weaker
« on: November 15, 2010, 05:22:40 pm »
Here was an interesting article from the sometimes good, sometimes bad T-Nation earlier this week that I enjoyed.

http://www.t-nation.com/free_online_article/most_recent/unilateral_movements_make_you_weak

Arguing that the Split squat is a single leg exercise is and always has been rubbish, but also his argument is pretty absolutist in comparing pistols etc versus barbell squats.

why is it rubbish? it's unilateral in the sense that only one leg is performing hip extension.. so even though there's two legs "on something" (one on ground, one on bench), they both have very different roles, the majority of movement comes from one limb.. i see your point though.. and ya, unilaterals/stepups would be considered far more unilateral.. weighted pistols etc, i'm not a fan.


Quote
I would also argue that getting strong on certain single leg exercises such as step ups and walking lunges (especially UPHILL walking lunges - but that does require a hill and the ability to carry your really heavy shit to a hill, and in some cases, a portable pair of squat stands to get some decent weight to walk up hill with onto the bar - unless you ar ehappe to clean it off the ground...but I digress) are extremely beneficial for running and jumping athletes, who were admittedly not really mentioned in the article.

it's a powerlifter/olylifter/bodybuilding vibe article, so, from a performance standpoint it does a disservice. Getting strong on bilateral movements is very important for athletes, you can recruit far more mass in each rep, cause significantly more fatigue/supercompensation, etc. Because the weight can be so much more (eventually), it really helps you tap more into the 'innate reserves', or the potential motor activity that is hidden/protected except in the most life threatening cases.. You can't achieve that using weighted pistols. You can achieve it to a point on unilaterals, but heavy bilateral training is far more effective, and shock/real plyos/BIG ADA can even be more effective.

You don't get scared/elevated HR/super aroused mentally before doing pistols, you do however achieve that before unilateral lunges, and even more so before heavy squatting.. that is a VERY important factor regarding tapping into protected motor potential.





Quote
Also, I have had back trouble recently and have not been able to squat or deadlift (ironically I was installing a new, very expensive, power rack into my gym when I injured myself - I haven't squatted on it at all  :pissed:) and have been doing nothing but dumbell lunges and weighted step ups for about 6 weeks now. It will be interestign to see how much my squat has dropped off when I get back to it (and I am expecting a drop off - ass the author of the article noted - for weighted exercises the transfer doesn't necessarily go the other way).


damn that sucks man..

it'll still have transfer.. regardless, if you gain strength/mass unilaterally, it will transfer, it's just that squat/lunge is such a different movement that of course it won't transfer perfectly, that's why the article bugs me, of course you're going to have to re-learn the squat a bit, but of course it will transfer... For example, if you weren't hurt, and focused on doing some massive unilaterals, barbell walking lunge, barbell bss, barbell stepup, and you did this for 12 weeks, comparing a pre-test squat 1RM vs post-test, there'd be no doubt that post-test squat would be way higher.

But overall the article is ok.

peace man, thanks for teh post!

18327
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: ARowe Milestone Achievement
« on: November 15, 2010, 03:30:05 pm »
If ARowe would work to get more speed and "nerve" into his jump he'd jump so much higher. Right now it's like a 100% strength generated jump... very little bounce... he doesn't take advantage of that runup accumulation.

dno man, looks reactive as hell to me.. he's 30.5/37.5, big diff.

18328
News, Announcements, & Suggestions / Re: Random adarq.org website news
« on: November 15, 2010, 06:21:03 am »
niiiice... i have from Bompa's plyometrics book, but its only 1 .txt page :)

lol 1 page wtf? :)

forgot about my project all day today, then remembered, got half of chapter 4 done.. got to finish it tomorrow.

pc

18329
Basketball / Re: haneef munir young hollywood keeps kissing the rim
« on: November 15, 2010, 05:28:56 am »

that rim is def low, like 9'10 at most.. but still, that jump is still insane..

i mean let's say he's getting chin to a 9'10 (118") rim at 71", 118 - 71 = 47 for top of head.. to chin it has to be about 8 inches.. so i'm thinking like 55" ?

the 60-62 you're seeing is the cam angle pic, i'd say highest he got is chin over.

still man wtf. haha

amazing

Ya , weve talked about that rim again , thats why i said "if it is legit 10".
I agree with your analysis , i used ~12'' above rim though , i think he gets a couple of inches below chin , normalizing the distortion.
That's our calculations difference 2'' from rim + 4'' from how higher he got.

Ok , my last offer 9'10'' rim + 6'1'' in shoes + 10'' above = 56''  ;D



lol ya.. his chin is up alot though from cervical extension, i took that into account, still 55-56 or so on that jump + he fell down, which makes it even more likely that it was insanely high.. in most cases, he wouldn't have fallen on a jump he could easily absorb, ie, a jump that was 50" and all cam angle..

55-56" or so, has to be something insane like that..

wtf.

18330
nice jumps in there at the end man, wonder how high it is..


Nice dunks man , i like the court too!



Today I jumped out of a plane at 13,500 feet. No workout.

adarq.org WR Depth Drop  :strong:  :headbang:  :strong:  :headbang:  :strong:  :headbang:

hahaha!!

Pages: 1 ... 1220 1221 [1222] 1223 1224 ... 1504