Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - adarqui

Pages: 1 ... 1218 1219 [1220] 1221 1222 ... 1504
18286
Introduce Yourself / Re: for 45" running vert
« on: November 17, 2010, 04:32:33 am »
tuesday:
 standiing neutral grip dbl shoulder press
30'sx25
50'sx10
70'sx8-newrecord
60'sx8
seated rows
100x40
220x10
345x5-form was looser, got vid on cam incase of you want to  see form.
300x7
bench
45x20
95x7>>shoudler press machine 115x8
95x7>>shoulder press machine 90x8
95x7
one arm tri pushdowns
40x15
60x6
bicep curls
shoudler stuff with cables
tricep one arm dbl
bicep machine

then played basketball, was only gonna play 1 game but 1 became 2  and 2 became 3....lol did pretty good tho arm was good whole time, missed a couple close range dunk lefty (like not much approach like dropstep) not gonna try righty dunks yet tho gotta be carfull with pec...standing jumps were good tho.....been eating real good (chicken and oats alot) besides a trip to wnedy for 4 double stack at 330....lol bad bear.


i havn't been to checkers in a while, man o man, those late night checkers runs were so good, until i was done eating, then i felt like such shit.. but it was good while it lasted.

bam son







my bad homie, it had2Bdone.

18287
neutral focus
SH:SP:SR:SH:SP:SR:SH:SP:SR:SH:SP:SR:

power focus
SH:SP:SP:SR:SR:SH:SP:SP:SR:SR:
speed/reactivity focus
SP:SR:SR:SR:STIM:TEST

I think I missed a SP workout. Will have to go back and double-check. Anyway, this week hasn't really provided the relief I'd been hoping for work-wise, but at least volleyball was canceled at the gym tonight, so I got to jump at the rim. Jumps weren't extraordinarily high, but they felt smooth and I was consistently getting 30", nothing lower, and maybe 2 30.5".

nice, you still working on getting lower in the jump? I recall that was getting you up a bit higher..

regardless, that's good, usually I see some 29's in here.. you hit like 12+ 30's? if so, real nice.


18288
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: My Training Videos
« on: November 17, 2010, 04:22:13 am »
the jumps themselves looked good, but the runups were slow, the landings were mushy and loud.

when you're not going max effort, work on nice smooth accelerative runups for both DLRVJ AND SLRVJ, 3-4 increasingly powerful steps, very fluid.. work on landing better too, control the landings more, it's a good way to get in some force absorption work.. think about landing soft/quiet as you're coming down, no need to stick the landings like a depth drop, but just try and land softr/more quiet.

impressed with GHR/hang snatch.. for GHR, sacrifice depth a little bit by trying to stay a bit straight, make sure you squeeze the glutes AND contract the low abs so that you're in a nice neutral position as you go down and up.. if you need to cut depth a bit to stay straight, do it.. see how it feels, it should be alot harder and much more hamstring.

i'm not an oly coach so i'll let whoever is critiquing your oly's do that (lance?).. but the hang snatch actually looked pretty good I was surprised, i thought I was about to see some spaz shit and bam, first & third reps looked really good, good stuff.. ;d

as for shooting, DID U PURPOSEFULLY SHOOT THIS VIDEO IN THE DARK TO PISS ME OFF?

loljk

but ya i can't see what i need to see other than the follow through and a few instances of good form, follow through looks good on most shots, there was one at 40s or something i remember, where you didn't hold your follow through, and you missed.. other than that, every follow through looked pretty good, not too far forward, nice wrist flick.. just can't see the feet too good etc and how everything is lining up.

but congrats, you look athletic :D

pc

18289
Nutrition & Supplementation / Re: junk food diet that works
« on: November 17, 2010, 12:45:36 am »
let's take a 200lb guy, 20% bf, trying to lose weight.

6 twinkies = 900 cal, 162g carbs, 27g fat, 6g protein
7 protein shakes = 840 cal, 14g carbs, 14g fat, 161g protein

total = 1740 cal, 176g carbs, 49g fat, 167g protein

i thought he did 2/3rds junk.

;/

8 focus foods: 1840 calories,  192g carbs, 56g fat,  176g protein


Oh wait you said 2/3 junk, not 100%.

lol'd.. wasn't expecting that when you linked it on live-chat.

18290
Nutrition & Supplementation / Re: junk food diet that works
« on: November 16, 2010, 11:10:56 pm »
let's take a 200lb guy, 20% bf, trying to lose weight.

6 twinkies = 900 cal, 162g carbs, 27g fat, 6g protein
7 protein shakes = 840 cal, 14g carbs, 14g fat, 161g protein

total = 1740 cal, 176g carbs, 49g fat, 167g protein

i thought he did 2/3rds junk.

;/

18291
http://tv.gawker.com/5686606/the-most-intensely-horrible-high-school-girls-hurdles-race-youll-ever-see

how is this allowed? these girls are going to tear their knees apart? regardless, hilarity.

18292
Olympic Weightlifting / 69kg lifters
« on: November 16, 2010, 09:34:52 pm »
nice competition here, but at the end, that world record was 2ez.. check the power in Boevski's cleans, he can front squat a house.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOoP5yX1bZ4" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOoP5yX1bZ4</a>




18293
Olympic Weightlifting / Re: Weightlifting pics
« on: November 16, 2010, 09:32:55 pm »

18294
good points darq, not going to make a drastic switch. Maybe lower the bar a litttle get a little more butt duck, because i do think as long as your not totally shooting your knees foreward, along with your knees being in line IE not caving in, knees shouldnt be a problem on squat.  Know what u mean on the full squat hip thing too, although my flexiblity may be more of an issue than my levers, but i dont feel like im build for squatting deep by any means

how do i fix the coming forward on toe thing? Is my squat the same depth as your adarq?


the shoes you are wearing are going to contribute to the coming forward onto toes issue, if you were in oly shoes it wouldn't happen. the first rep is good (in regards to going onto toes) because you are a little higher, the next reps are deeper so you're getting that shift.. without changing form, try stretching the calfs/"ankles" out very good prior to squatting, or in between sets, see if that helps, this is to allow for easier getting into dorsiflexion without having to shift the knees forward at the bottom.. other than that, are you focusing on producing force through the middle of the foot? i'm not one to promote pushing through the heel, but middle of foot ya.


Quote
steven miller- good stuff man know where ur coming from

18295
Quote
Not trying to convince anybody really. If you get the results you want, everything is good. Just wanted to give reason for what I wrote.

it's all good man i appreciate your advice/willingness to give your side of the issue.. this forum isn't a monarchy :F

peace

18296
Nutrition & Supplementation / Re: junk food diet that works
« on: November 16, 2010, 06:36:08 pm »
my post on another forum:

awesome, a professor who was 33% fat got down to 24% eating far less than maintenance kcal consisting of junk, who cares Smile

a calorie is not just a calorie, a gram of carb (especially sugar) has a very different effect on the body than a gram of protein. Hormonally, junk is not something we should be consuming if we want to get strong, shredded, and actually put on mass. Sure he lost some body fat, but we're athletes, not fat f**k professors who have alot of bodyfat to lose.. Junk food diets typically don't do well with performance athletes, it leaves them less alert & less motivated to compete. I guarantee you that, these stupid studies would be alot different if you look at someone trying to go from 15% BF to 6% bodyfat. A caloric deficit wouldn't mean (expletive), the body would try to keep fat (which would happen easily due to all the sugars/sat fat you're eating), and you'd actually lose lean mass.. so sure, your BMI would go down, but you'd lose mass and become relatively fatter.

I hate that stupid study Smile

peace

Yes and no. Caloric deficit always matters if you're trying to lose weight. If you're trying to get from 15% to 6%, you still have to be in a deficit. It just becomes that much more important to get enough protein and keep lifting, for maintenance of muscle mass. Obviously, I'm not saying a junk food diet + protein is optimal for anyone at any time. I'm just saying that if you want to lose weight, caloric deficit matters.

sure it does, my point is simply that, a diet high in junk food is not going to be high in protein if caloric deficit is achieved, the percentages just can't happen with high fat/high carb junk food being a majority of the diet.. so physique/strength is going to suffer greatly.

pc

18297
Article & Video Discussion / Re: Unilaterals Make You Weaker
« on: November 16, 2010, 06:31:25 pm »
steven-miller's next project is to get really really fast by doing nothing but double-legged bounds.  :P

lol

when it comes performance that involves highly single leg efforts, ie single leg jumpers and sprinters, bilateral only training can REALLY screw that up.

i mean we've all seen it, the SL jumper who gets into lifting, focuses primarily on squatting, then becomes a double leg jumper.

pc

Interesting you should say that Andrew. I agree with what you are saying but have no scientific evidence other than my own experiences.  Last summer I focused on running a lot of hill sprints and doing walking lunges as my primary leg training as it was easier on my knees. I found that as a result when I did any max effort jumping my body naturally wanted to do single leg jumps even though I don't do any specific jump training any more (just weights and hill sprints).

it is my opinion that, people with a naturally larger bilateral deficit, will tend to naturally want to be a single leg jumper.. As you train bilaterally, this deficit decreases and eventually becomes nullified, creating then a unilateral deficit.. So, by training bilaterally solely (and being a single leg jumper), it's going to cause more inhibition for unilateral athletic movements and less inhibition for bilateral athletic movements, because heavy bilateral training (without unilateral) causes large adaptations towards improving/utilizing this new found strength/motor programming etc. People who perform very poorly on unilaterals vs bilaterals are most often than not, going to want to jump double leg. People with a naturally lower bilateral deficit seem to be more "strength dominant", while people with a large bilateral deficit tend to be more of the reactive type.

so, a focus on unilateral-only training, will create a bigger bilateral deficit, which gives you that "sensation" of wanting to jump single leg.. I know the sensation, it's just, in your mind, everything is telling you to launch off one leg.. this happened when I was doing those very high rep bodyweight walking lunges for 1 month, the 800 total shit hah.. But ya, I had urges to jump single leg, every jump session, eventually I even tried dunks.. Shortly after stopping that lunge experiment due to dangerous conditions performing them (heh), i don't get those urges anymore.. I have 0 urge to jump single leg..


Quote
Now several years ago when I trained exclusively for vertical I did a lot more squatting and trap bar deadlifting, as well as box jumps with a weight vest and back then I was a two foot jumper.




Quote
Whoever said T-Nation has declined is right. They still have a few good articles here and there though, this one was worth the read I thought.

Good topic for the mental masturbators.

we are all masturbating mentally, thanks to you.

18298
Article & Video Discussion / Re: Unilaterals Make You Weaker
« on: November 16, 2010, 06:07:59 pm »
steven-miller's next project is to get really really fast by doing nothing but double-legged bounds.  :P

lol

when it comes performance that involves highly single leg efforts, ie single leg jumpers and sprinters, bilateral only training can REALLY screw that up.

i mean we've all seen it, the SL jumper who gets into lifting, focuses primarily on squatting, then becomes a double leg jumper.

pc

18299
Article & Video Discussion / Re: Unilaterals Make You Weaker
« on: November 16, 2010, 06:05:38 pm »
One of the reason I like unilaterals is because you can work depending on your weak limb. If you can lunge 90 kg for 5 reps with your right leg and 90 kg for 10 reps with your left leg, then you can limit your left leg training to the right leg RM. So they both get the same amount of training.

In a squat, you'd probably load more the left leg in this situation and continue with the imbalance (sure, doing the same amount of reps and doing a bilateral exercise will also help balance things out in the end). But I just feel like more focus can be applied with an unilateral exercise, there's also a bit less stability so the core works harder etc.

If you have severe strength imbalances that show in your squat, you need to use less weight. Some people have the problem of using one side differently in the squat than another and this can usually be dealt with if you are aware of it. Take weight of the bar and concentrate on perfect, symmetrical form. A unilateral exercise might help with the awareness, but the possibility of compensation is not ruled out by that - you still need to be very aware of your form.

I disagree about the core working harder. My core works harder in a 5 rm squat and works less in a 5 rm lunge due to the differences in weight being used.

what is your 5RM lunge/5RM squat, for example, when you trained that way?

for example, when I was doing 225 lb barbell walking lunges for singles, the max was probably around 235, and my half squat was 315 x 1, at 165.. the walking lunge singles were extremely intense.


Quote
It really just depends on what you're trying to improve on, I guess. So for athletics, unilateral work "must" be done because I feel it really helps and is more specific to human movement. For powerlifting etc, I don't really feel it "must" be done because it doesn't have any specificity to that.

I agree with that. Although I wouldn't use them for beginners.

why wouldn't you use unilaterals for beginners? or did i misunderstand.

and is this for performance, or just strength athletes?

peace

18300
Article & Video Discussion / Re: Unilaterals Make You Weaker
« on: November 16, 2010, 05:51:22 pm »
You can always do both, for those athletes you mentioned, single leg work wouldn't be the emphasis of their training.
Single leg work balances your legs out better than bilateral work.

With that said, I will step out of this mental masturbation circle jerk.

Please post evidence or provide logic reasoning for why unilaterals should balance out the legs more than correctly performed - which means balanced - bilateral exercises. And please explain why a powerlifter should do unilateral work when everything he does in his sport is bilateral in nature and will usually require a coordinated, well-balanced effort of both his left and right body side.
And don't just say "you can always do both", because only an idiot would bring forward such an argument, since it means that he does not understand that everything that is useless is in fact also detrimental because it means that valuable training time as well as physical resources are wasted which could otherwise be used for productive things that actually do something to help ones progress. And I don't think that you are an idiot, so please let us discuss this in an intelligent manner.

that stuff is going to be a bitch to find on google scholar, but regardless, most athletes (performance or strength) have a dominant and non-dominant limb for kicking/throwing etc.. this does effect bilateral movements.. unilateral strength work can definitely help to improve these imbalances, but i would imagine not completely improve them. There will always be a dominant/non-dominant limb, and this does effect force production, so bilaterally you're going to see some significant results there.

steven-miller, do you have any idea how high you jump off your right leg vs left leg?

here's two quick studies, unilateral/bilateral is a bitch to search..

Quote
Determination of Functional Strength Imbalance of the Lower Extremities

Abstract

The purposes of this study were (a) to determine whether a significant strength imbalance existed between the left and right or dominant (D) and nondominant (ND) legs and (b) to investigate possible correlations among various unilateral and bilateral closed kinetic chain tests, including a field test, and traditional isokinetic dynamometry used to determine strength imbalance. Fourteen Division I collegiate women softball players (20.2 +/- 1.4 years) volunteered to undergo measures of average peak torque for isokinetic flexion and extension at 60[degrees][middle dot]s-1 and 240[degrees][middle dot]s-1; in addition, measures of peak and average force of each leg during parallel back squat, 2-legged vertical jump, and single-leg vertical jump and performance in a 5-hop test were examined. Significant differences of between 4.2% and 16.0% were evident for all measures except for average force during single-leg vertical jump between the D and ND limbs, thus revealing a significant strength imbalance. The 5-hop test revealed a significant difference between D and ND limbs and showed a moderate correlation with more sophisticated laboratory tests, suggesting a potential use as a field test for the identification of strength imbalance. The results of this study indicate that a significant strength imbalance can exist even in collegiate level athletes, and future research should be conducted to determine how detrimental these imbalances could be in terms of peak performance for athletes, as well as the implications for injury risk.






Quote



edit: so, a powerlifter should incorporate some kind of unilateral training as assistance to help improve the deficit between non-dominant and dominant limbs.. this will be easier with lower body, ie using lunges/stepups/bss.. for upper body, single arm db press or single arm snatch, single arm curl, & single arm row would probably be the most beneficial. Kroc, for example, is a huge fan of unilateral lifting, he's a powerlifter, you can catch him doing insane 1-arm db rows with like 225 & high rep log walking lunges.


peace

Pages: 1 ... 1218 1219 [1220] 1221 1222 ... 1504