Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - vag

Pages: 1 ... 111 112 [113] 114 115 ... 341
1681
Whenever I see people buy cars and so on, I think "easy for you to say, you earn ~5 times more than me yet the car price is the same for both of us.

Human nature. The same thoughts could be made about you for being able to buy some bread or basic medicine. So many people dying from famine, 1/3 of the entire population does not have access to clean water. Not picking on you, i know it's hard there. Just saying. It is really disappointing how little we have progressed, the world we have made so far is plain fucked up.
PS : The infiniti is awesome :D

1682
Basketball / Re: A WHOLE BUNCH OF DUNKS AND SHIT.
« on: April 27, 2016, 03:32:06 am »
Of course we all clicked at the suggested video there to see the double eastbay attempts, didn't we?

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yT9NJcXm6Oc" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yT9NJcXm6Oc</a>

1683
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: April 26, 2016, 05:46:01 pm »
26 April 2016

Bodyweight@session : ~86kg
Soreness : quads , abs, little glutes.
Injuries/aches : none

T0DDDAY-BASED ALTERNATING GYM-TRACK SPLIT

Week #2
Total gym days : 3
Total park days : 3

Gym day #1

HANG POWER CLEAN:
5@20kg
5@30kg
5@40kg
3@50kg
3@52,5kg ( +2,5 kg )
3@55kg ( +2,5 kg )
5@50kg ( extra set )
-Great, powerful, fast and fluid.

SQUAT:
4@80kg
7@70kg
7@70kg
-Nice. This 'new' quad soreness doesn't mess with my squat like the 'old' quad fatigue.
Fatigue is still there but it is clearly diminishing. Finally i could do some volume in good form and feel. Decent base to build up from.

BENCH PRESS:
5@62,5kg ( +2,5 kg )
5@62,5kg ( +2,5 kg )
5@62,5kg ( +2,5 kg )
20@45kg ( +5 kg )
-Good progress.

DEAD HANG PULLUPS:
6@BW
6@BW
6@BW
LAT PULLDOWN DROP-SET: 18@130lbs ( +3 reps )

SLANT BENCH LEG RAISES:
10@BW ( -5 reps )
10@BW ( -5 reps )
-Fail, abs were destroyed, true pain when contracting.

45' EXTENSIONS:
15@BW
15@BW

1684
Basketball / Re: Crazy ending at Greek league quarter-finals game
« on: April 26, 2016, 05:21:24 pm »
I searched a bit, there are a few similar cases that they get confused from the ending game tension, but they are all high-school games.

The only pro cases i found were:

A bunch of clearly unintended:
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXtWVm4vRvk" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXtWVm4vRvk</a>

A spectacular one but also probably unintended:
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwoU4iTNbg0" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwoU4iTNbg0</a>

And Nate's intended ( although he most probably thought it was after the buzzer ):
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOhLgApNrgM" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOhLgApNrgM</a>

1685
Basketball / Re: Crazy ending at Greek league quarter-finals game
« on: April 26, 2016, 04:58:09 pm »
Some more info...

-My title is wrong, it was quarter finals, not semi finals.

-It was a best of 3 series, Aris had won the first game. If this guy didn't score this own basket buzzer beater, Kifisia would have tied the series 1-1 and would have a chance for the break to advance. Aris won at 2nd OT so also won the series 2-0. So this was a critical basket.

-There is much legal discussion. According to FIBA rules, own baskets count only when they were not intended, e.g. trying to rebound. In this   case, he clearly wanted to score the basket, but he didn't want to score an own basket. So was it intended or not? Referees called it not-deliberate so they counted it ( i agree ) , however you see the legal 'leak'.

Heh, crazy. Check out his opponent , he LOLs in his face immediately.

1686
Basketball / Crazy ending at Greek league quarter-finals game
« on: April 26, 2016, 08:13:11 am »
Kifisia ( white ) vs Aris ( yellow )

End of OT. 5 seconds left. Aris is down 2 points and has a free throw......

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FO-mzb03UNE" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FO-mzb03UNE</a>

1687
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: April 26, 2016, 05:48:23 am »
25 April 2016

Bodyweight@session : n/a
Soreness : weird quad soreness
Injuries/aches : none

T0DDDAY-BASED ALTERNATING GYM-TRACK SPLIT

Week #2
Total gym days : 2
Total park days : 3

Park day #1


Dynamic warmup

6 * standing broad jumps :
Best = ~2,25m , average = ~2.1m
-Small decrease from last time.

4 * 4 DL bounds :
Best = ~9.4m ,  :personal-record:
Improvement at the other ones too, again last time's peak was this time's base.

4 * 60m @ 100% :
-All around 10s

6 * 150m @ 75% , start every 2 minutes
1 * 150m @ 100% : ~25.5s ,  :personal-record:

Quads keep surprising me. This usual 'fatigue' that i complain all the time, which is always located at the middle of vastus lateralis, was not there. Now i had an intense soreness feeling at the middle and high of the quads, should be middle of rectus femoris or top of vastus medialis from what i see. No idea where it came from. It would be pretty bad , during sprints i was almost cramping, WTF!
This weird quad soreness caused a voluntary force output sabotage, broad jumps and sptint strarts felt bad.
However, there was a notable improvement in reactivity/bounce, running at top speed and bounding felt very fluid and easy, as evidenced by the 150m and DL-bound PRs despite bad quads.
Easter coming up here, 5 days of no activity and increased sleep&food, so i'll keep grinding till then.

1688
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: April 25, 2016, 05:08:15 am »
^^Yes, you are both right obviously. It is a bit if a pain int the ass though setting cam up to get both start and end, i need to get my cam and tripod there too ( no place to put phone ) etc. I'll do it eventually ( for form check too ) but it is still so early that i don't care that much about accuracy,. The stopwatch start-at-toes-off-stop-at-first-touch-over-finish-line covers me 99.99%, just need a new stopwatch.



23 April 2016

Bodyweight@session : 85kg , 2016 lowest. Expected+'fake', AM training with light dinner and no breakfast
Soreness : chest, quads, abs, hamstrings, glutes
Injuries/aches : none

T0DDDAY-BASED ALTERNATING GYM-TRACK SPLIT

Week #1
Total gym days : 2
Total park days : 2

Gym day #2


PUSH PRESS:
5@20kg
5@30kg
4@40kg
3@50kg
3@50kg
3@50kg

DEADLIFT:
10@20kg
10@40kg
8@60kg
6@80kg
3@100kg
1@120kg
0@140kg
RDL 2*8@90kg

DIPS:
6@BW
6@BW
6@BW
6@BW

STANDING CALF RAISES MACHINE:
12@BW+70kg
12@BW+70kg
12@BW+70kg
12@BW+70kg

Quads off again. LOL, its a recover-and-re-wreck process. They ruined my DL 140kg PR tie attempt. I could get the weight up with my back but i didn't, wanted it to be leg-driven, especially at the start. So i failed. They ruined my push-press too, there was not much quality at the push component. What can you do.

1689
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: April 22, 2016, 02:51:48 pm »
22 April 2016

Bodyweight@session : n/a
Soreness : chest a lot, quads, abs, triceps and back a little
Injuries/aches : none

T0DDDAY-BASED ALTERNATING GYM-TRACK SPLIT

Week #1
Total gym days : 1
Total park days : 2

Park day #2


Dynamic warmup

6 * standing broad jumps
Best = 2,4m , same with last time.
-However all the others were at ~2.25, improvement.

4 * 4 DL bounds:
Best = 9.3m ,  two times , :personal-record:
-The others were 9m. Last time's best = this time's base, win. Difference was arm-swing timing.

4 * 60m @ 100%
-Best = 9.7x s ,  :personal-record:
All the rest around 10. Sloppy timing again. Mobile sucks. Gotta get that stopwatch this weekend.

6 * 150m @ 75% , start every 2 minutes
-Much improved intensity % control, missed only the first one ( ~31s ) , got all the others around 35s as planned.

2 silly PRs today, just because it is new exercises though, lol. Gonna get a few more the next couple of weeks. Legs fatigue going down together with  learning the movement = easy progress. Then begins the challenge. Ill be there to take it.

1690
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: April 22, 2016, 09:02:25 am »
They are great. There are many variations, i picked those because at the time they had the best stability/firmness combination. They are running shoes, i wouldn't play basketball in them. But they serve my DLRVJs awesomely too, i squat-plant anyway. Here is their review , mine are the 6s , i see the 8s are out now : http://www.runnersworld.com/shoe/adidas-supernova-glide-6-mens
I recently read this review, this is the ultra-boost ( even more 'magic' foam ) with design emphasis on stability : http://weartesters.com/adidas-ultra-boost-st-performance-review/
And i still haven't taken those babies out of their box, saving them for next year but will probably will take them for a test-drive at the park when i start jumping , stay tuned: http://weartesters.com/adidas-rose-6-performance-review/

1691
0.02 is still important, 0.02 for 2 splits is 0.04, that is enough to transform you from an unknown guy that was 4th at a race to an immortal Olympic medal winner.

It can be considered an acceleration indeed. Small one , but it is. At that speed ( around 40kmh ) , 0.02s improvement means around 1kmh speed-up.

Here is a chart from that race that i just found , it verifies that:



Thought you meant they accelerate till 100m which i found crazy but i miss-read , you talked about correlation there.

But since we talk about special cases , here is the WR race analysis:

http://sportsscientists.com/2009/08/analysis-of-bolts-9-58-wr/

This uses 20m splits insdead of 10m, so some detail may be lost, but those mofos improve their 60-80m split by 0.05 , such beasts!!!





1692
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: April 22, 2016, 05:43:46 am »
I am wearing adidas supernova glide boost for all my outdoor activities. I love boost foam with passion. Shoe is not ultra light like them XCs etc but it is not heavy/bulky either, it is a great combination of everything.

Abs and hamstrings got torched from the sprints & bounds session. Some glutes soreness too. No quads at all. Got my ass to the gym yesterday.

21 April 2016

Bodyweight@session : ~86kg
Soreness : none
Injuries/aches : none

NOT YET APPROVED/NAMED ROUTINE

Week #1
Total gym days : 1
Total park days : 1

Gym day


HANG POWER CLEAN:
5@20kg
5@30kg
5@40kg
3@50kg
3@50kg
3@50kg
-50kg felt lighter than i expected. However didn't push it, gonna take it easy, initially focus more on form, triple extension, power. Weight can wait.

SQUAT:
5@20kg
5@40kg
3@60kg
2@80kg
2@90kg
-Ah, nice, fatigue/stress is going down. Doubling 90kg was much more easy and solid that doubling 80kg last time. Still far from 100% though.

BENCH PRESS:
5@60kg
5@60kg
5@60kg
20@40kg

DEAD HANG PULLUPS:
6@BW
6@BW
6@BW
LAT PULLDOWN DROP-SET: 15@130lbs

SLANT BENCH LEG RAISES:
15@BW
15@BW

45' EXTENSIONS:
15@BW
15@BW

1693
Basketball / Re: The Dunk King - coming May 18 on TNT
« on: April 22, 2016, 04:02:01 am »
Yup, the dunking video has some distortion, i would guess it is around eye-level to rim, so 4'' above rim
The other one is insane though, he is about nose-to-rim level with a huge body angle too. I'd give him 6'' above rim easy for that one, maybe a couple inches more.
But i don't know his height or the rim height. So no numbers.

1694
MUSiC anD SHeeT! / Re: What Are You Listening To Right Now?
« on: April 22, 2016, 03:51:51 am »
WTF, Prince died?!?!?!?!? FUUUUUUUU

Word has a little less color now.

:( :( :(

1695
Top sprinter's don't accelerate till 100m, that is ridiculous.



Look at the times. Nobody has split time improvement over 50m, and their improvement from 30 to 50 is around 0.02 per split.
Practically, they are at top speed from 30m already.

Pages: 1 ... 111 112 [113] 114 115 ... 341