Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - LanceSTS

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 ... 99
166
What if you have really long arms? Should you aim for the hip crease anyway? That would pretty much give me a snatch grip...

pull shoulders back, even bend elbows slightly but keep bend constant.  The dip at the start with the knees helps this a lot as well.  I may try and do a video on it if it seems like Im not clear here, its kind of hard to portray in words, once you get it you have no question youre doing it right though.

167

  First off Im sorry for taking so long to respond to your rdl video Vag, Ive been moving into a new house in the same complex with my gym and havent had much time at all. 


No prob , i saw you were away from the whole forum, thanks for replying!

So , if i get it right, my main flaws would be that:
-I am not sweeping the bar , it goes a bit away from my body. Pulling with lats and keeping it on heels fixes that.
-I am lowering the bar, not pushing my hips back. I need to push hips as back as i can maintaining neutral spine and steady knees bend.

How is my spine? Is it neutral? If not, am i arching or rounding? My upper back natural posture is kyphotic btw, i am mostly referring to lower back during the lift.
Keep in mind that the video is a maximal lift, most i have ever done is 7x253 and this day i did 3x5@253 , PRish performance.
I will try to apply all cues tomorrow, will go lighter.

I would suggest re working with the start position I described.  The range of motion is greatly increased this way, which is an issue for you in the video.  Correct with the sweeping the bar and pushing hips to the rear.   It sounds more complicated than it really is, stay on heels, hips extended, then you bend ONLY AT THE KNEE 3 inches. Hips are still extended and bar will be swept in to the hip crease.  This is the START and FINISH position.  Knee bend remains a constant.

168

  First off Im sorry for taking so long to respond to your rdl video Vag, Ive been moving into a new house in the same complex with my gym and havent had much time at all. 

 The way we teach the rdl is to start with glutes fired forward, weight on heels, and bar swept into the hip crease using the lats.  You need to actively PULL the weight into you while youre tensing the glutes.  bend ONLY at the knees, 3 inches, while keeping the glutes forward, and the weight on the heels.  If you watch Pendlay clean and snatch progressions, this is position 1 in my blog.  This bend (3 inches) will remain constant throughout the entire exercise.  When you reach full hip extension, this is where you finish.

 To start the movement, sweeping the bar into your thighs with the lats as you push the hips to the rear, you will descend as far back with your hips as your flexibility allows.  DONT think about the barbell going DOWN, simply sweep it in against you, and think of the hips going back.  With the starting position described, you will not bend at the knee any more than is already pre set.  This is one of the most important things and easiest ways of not turning the exercise into something its not supposed to be.

 To finish you simply drive your hips into the bar, while continuing to sweep the weight into you with the lats.  You will finish in the exact position you started, with the knees slightly bent. 

There are other ways to do it, but this method has proven very useful and really allows a glute driven rdl while taking the issues of knee extension out entirely that typically happen when starting to learn the movement.  Remember that the bar is not the focus on the way down, its merely there and "ignore" the depth it reaches.  Focus is entirely on hips moving back, then hips moving forward.

169

  lmao ^.  I wouldnt have even read it if it came from colbert. 

170
its cause he is soo tall

Completely unrelated, but in the schroeder/iso article he references knee pain caused via popliteus and that activation of it solves this issue.  How is he referring to activating the popliteus? Contraction of the hamstring of front leg?

nice new articles btw  :strong:

What's the schroeder article you are talking about?  Do you have a link?  Very interested in this article will read through this one at work!

http://evolutionaryathletics.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/isoextremes-dr-j-2.pdf


171
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: beast
« on: October 07, 2012, 08:59:53 am »
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne659Uf2hUM" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne659Uf2hUM</a>


so sick.. 4.2 40yd dash



<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzbnEROO1FQ" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzbnEROO1FQ</a>

172
its cause he is soo tall

Completely unrelated, but in the schroeder/iso article he references knee pain caused via popliteus and that activation of it solves this issue.  How is he referring to activating the popliteus? Contraction of the hamstring of front leg?

nice new articles btw  :strong:

173
Article & Video Discussion / Re: form check: squats
« on: September 28, 2012, 04:17:38 pm »

  Cant really tell anything without an overhead angle/ fish eyes lens and slow mo/music edited in, birth certificate, social security card, and also get a muscle biopsy done. 

From first glance they look really good though. 




edit: its not mandatory, but if you can hook yourself up to a polygraph machine when squatting next time it will be easier to give proper feedback.

174
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: chasing athleticism
« on: September 28, 2012, 11:48:38 am »

  Lifts look much better.  Dont get too overy critical of minor details that cause you to get frustrated.  Your squat is FOR SURE training your legs in a way that will strengthen them for athleticism.  Sure you can eventually get even more upright and more stable, but what youre doing now is also effective as you continue to improve technically.  Keep trying to improve and dont fall into that "I simply CAN NOT do xxxx".  You can, and look how far youve already come.

  I wouldnt get so frustrated with the missed pr's either.  Some days youre going to have "off" workouts, its many reasons that cause this and some of them are actually positive.  Having a set goal of volume like 30-40 total reps at >80% can really work well for you in those cases, you get some very crucial volume in even though youre not hitting a pr, that will enable future pr's in the next weeks. 

175
 
Same thing we talked about earlier, I would imagine you are arching too hard and letting the pelvis come out of neutral with the rdl.  If you can video it will help and you can see yourself do it.  What it feels like youre doing may not really be whats happening.  Take from the side if you do it.  Once you get the rdl down though it will destroy the sldl in terms of glute activity, if nothing else the load you can safely use is much greater.

176
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: September 26, 2012, 07:38:33 pm »

  Raptor - yea, if you keep at it you can get to where youll get the glutes to turn on.  Go light, pause, etc., then soon you can turn it into a regular speed

  Vag- sorry for interruption log  :huh:



 If you want to talk more on it Raptor start a thread in my section on it and Ill get to it when I get back from gym tonight.

177
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: September 26, 2012, 07:17:29 pm »
Yeah, also keeping the chin a bit down as well I found out it helps preventing this "overchestation".


My belief is that having great calf and hamstring strength would allow me to obtain and maintain a straight leg plant in my one-leg jumps, without all that overload occuring at the knee/knee collapse. That's the most important thing, by far, in the one leg jump at least when dunking is concerned. If you're able to get into that position without collapse then you're only going to be limited by glute power in the hip extension as far as voluntarily applied force is concerned in the jump itself, having the best possible lever (the straight leg).

 I agree with all this ^ very much so.  Thing is, the hamstrings HAVE to get very strong in a PROPER rdl, IN THE EXACT MANNER YOU ARE REFERRING TO.  You need them to be "stiff" in movement, so the powerful hip extension doesnt cause a leak in power as you transfer force into the ground.  You will notice with an rdl, once it gets heavy, some will break at the knee in the exact manner you suggested. same thing with the reverse hyper.   Not allowing this is part of training the movement properly.  No way in the world you build up to a solid, good form, heavy rdl and dont have insane hamstring strength.

Note that people beginning to squat, and that have issues like this link here SHOULD focus on primarily CHEST WAY THE FUCK UP INTO OUTER SPACE.  So the cue has its uses, only not for guys like yourself who actually know what it feels like to maintain a flat back.  


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFo8apOEVJc&feature=channel&list=UL

178
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: September 26, 2012, 06:56:15 pm »
Yeah I have been practicing a posterior-tilt in my KB swings but at the end of the movement, and it really gets the glutes fire. The idea came from Bret Contreras' "American Deadlift".

But like you said, the "chest up and out" is exactly what got me where I am in the first place. It does a bunch of stuff, it usually turns you very quad dominant as well, for example even in the KB swings I have the tendency to keep an upright torso and bend the knee and take the tension of the hamstrings too so... it's all messed up.


How he describes that "American deadlift" is exactly how I am explaining the rdl, only keep the knee slightly bent and at the same angle with the rdl through the entire rom.

Every single one of the athletes I get that has the problem you do got it from squatting with those cues overdone.  Sometimes they are fairly strong already as well but they tend to feel their hams and quads in the squat much more than their glutes until they fix it.  I have them "flex the abs while staying tall" rather than chest out and it helps over time.  Think of a plank standing up  :strong:

179
ADARQ & LanceSTS - Q&A / Re: Backward depth drops
« on: September 26, 2012, 06:48:55 pm »

  I would imagine doing them like that would hit the calves/achilles hard for sure.  If you have a weak point there Id imagine it would work.  That being said, doing single leg bounds, and really spending enough time to get EXCELLENT at them will do far more for your single leg vert, and I would spend 99% of your plyo time doing exactly that and the actual movement at the court.

180
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: September 26, 2012, 06:40:23 pm »


Luckily I use the deadlifts as straight leg deadlifts FOR the hamstrings so... whatever :D

 You will get tons of hamstring work, in the way they are supposed to work with a proper rdl.  What you said right there identifies your problem perfectly.  "I over arch and dont know why, but im gonna keep hammering on that movement pattern and strengthen it so I have no chance of doing it right."

 Thats akin to using the barbell row as a bicep exercise. 


 You CAN fix it, and getting to neutral takes practice.  Try flexing your abdominals without shortening the torso.  Try to shove your pelvis through the end of your glutes as you go down ie. "turn the pelvis upside down".   Thats not possible obviously but given that cue will help a lot in getting to true neutral where you are driving from the correct muscles.   

 The problem you have is very common, especially with people who have been lifting for a while.  So much emphasis is put on "chest up and out" that it gets overdone, and eventually takes the glutes out the movement.  Start with an unloaded rdl, go to the bottom, and see if you can contract your glutes.  If you cant, go up again and "pull down" with the hip flexors.  Keep at it until you get the glutes firing hard, this will be the position you are looking for.

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 ... 99