15136
LanceSTS's Performance Blog / Re: STS TV
« on: August 31, 2011, 01:04:12 am »
selfullaah73 = beast.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
U crazy, sir

Just my luck. When I'm at my best, injuries happen.
Minor ankle sprain today during pick up games. I was able to walk on my feet, it hurts a bit though. I wanted to upload a new video for my birthday (next sunday) with some dunks recorded in trieste also...I just hope to be able to feel fine for friday's planned dunk session.
Bleh :\
quad-nation going single leg!
Man that court looks just great, and I love those clouds on the sky.
1-leg FOR THE WIN
1 leg ftw!
Even though I'm slowly transitioning towards 2 leg jumping as my weight increases, definitely 1 leg take offs FTW!!

No room for weak people here. When fair questions are asked and fair points are brought up and you just leave instead of answering them, don't expect any respect.

































It's always the people who don't get results that want to change the basics, thinking they are different. How about you increase your relative strength in the squat and stay active by jumping a lot and then see if you jump higher
Of course you're done RJ. You're mad because nobody is kissing your ass here like they used to on dbhammer. It's different on this site. We're sick of people talking as if they were gurus yet haven't done anything themselves or trained anyone. Your strength levels may be impressive compared to people on here, but let's not forget you have pretty good genetics for strength. I believe you said you bench pressed 300+ when you were 17 after only a few months of training. That's a feat that takes most people years, and probably a feat you're bs-ing just like your power snatches.
It's different here than on dbhammer. People actually get results here (for the most part). They get these results by sticking to the basics. There's no room here for "gurus" such as yourself who change their mind about what is optimal every week, and claim it's backed by science yet haven't actually seen it work themselves. People like you (and the rest of the guys from dbhammer) try to over complicate everything and that's why you get nowhere.
And of course you ignore all my posts again.
Guys, I'm done here. No, the shrimp should not be used exclusively. I use it because it's convenient for me, setup-wise. Squats would work great, lunges would work great, BSS would work great, snatch-grip DLs would work great, but they're all less convenient for me, and so, I don't use them.
You're all welcome to continue doing what you want. I'm gone.
What if we go the other way around? Say, with an easier exercise like the leg press vs the squat? The leg press doesn't require any stabilization that you require in the squat just as the BSS or lunge requires less stabilization vs the shrimp.
So far, less need for stabilization was actually better.
I can tell you one thing (as far as my recent injury):
YOU DON'T WANT ANY TWIST WHEN SQUATTING
0:52.
EXTREMELY FU*KING STUPID.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOyDKzxvLbA
I believe I'm adding plenty to the discussion.
Were "shrimps" talked about in your Engineering the Athlete book that was backed by science and can be compared to the works of Verkhoshansky ? If the answer is no, I think everyone can see why nobody should listen to a word you say.