Adarq.org

Damn in the post where I posted the score cards I forgot to add this link, where paulie and others tweets.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/brianmazique/2017/07/02/manny-pacquiao-vs-jeff-horn-these-10-credible-people-dont-think-pac-man-was-robbed

Bu that buster douglas fight, I watched recently when I read virgil hunter's comments of andre berto beating floyd mayweather i think or maybe khan vs mayweather and he referred to this fight in terms of how they could win, as they had no same ring iq as floyd so they would just have to try hard and just beat him.

it was def a big upset. They should have had a rematch and I think maybe tyson would have won it if that loss humbled him,

Mayweather choses his top 5 boxers and yes he put himself in no.1 lol.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9-HzMSJ-lU" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9-HzMSJ-lU</a>

It shows how he rates boxers, not by their abilities but by their records.

This covers in the beginning of what I was talking about espn's biased commentary towards pacquiao swaying people's opinion towards pacquiao being robbed and mentions people who feel pacquiao did lose.

malignaggi feels the same way about the decision and that you should watch espn fight on mute lol.

Dudes. Just saw the fight.

Horn winning that is not at all controversial IMHO. That was nowhere near a robbery like people are saying. That was a brutal, dirty fight. Honestly I had Horn winning 7-5 or a draw 6-6. If you were a judge LIVE at that fight, the aggression of Horn could have easily caused you to give him more rounds than Pacquiao.

Everyone all over the net, including boxing analysts, need to realize Pacquiao barely jabbed and NEVER went to the body. Pacquiao lost that fight himself. You don't box a bull by just throwing straights and hooks.

Pacquiao is an elite fighter & he didn't show it one bit. He showed heart, but not smarts. No jab, no body attack, absolutely horrible strategy by Pacquiao who probably thought there's no way he wouldn't be able to KO Horn.. and it came back to bite him bad.

Quote from: seifullaah73 on July 02, 2017, 07:32:34 pm

why pacquiao why??  I was eager to watch him fight then I see this and I start to dislike pacquiao as the rounds progress.
I just do not understand.

mass brainwash into thinking it was controversial decision sprouting from espn. who ever watch espn would think pacquiao won cos of the biased commentary (cough hbo and us broadcasters) I was boxnation so I think it was neutral but then again they may have been biased towards horn, which I didn't sense alot of.

3 judges, 2 from us and 1 from argentina. I would agree with 115-113 to horn.

Completely agree with the "announcers" swaying people. That was a very close fight. One of the announcers (I forget who it was) was keeping it real, he said it was very close.

Pacquiao had a chance to get Horn out of there in the 9th & subsequent rounds, but Horn somehow came right back & stayed in it.. I mean the ref came up to him in the corner and told him he was going to stop it. Horn comes right out and makes it a fight again.

I don't like Horn's style at all.. He's a spaz & he's dirty as fuck. But he has HEART that's for sure. This dude dug deep and keep pushing Pacquiao to his limits.



Hardly controversial IMHO. Calling this a robbery, is an injustice to *REAL* boxing robberies. 

Finally, thanks for stating that. It's true the channel I watched they had it horn ahead by a small amount at the end the presenter was angry at the tweets people sending of robbery and dirty tactics and such. I saw horn winning the early rounds, with pacquiao winning some like round 3 and such but later on pacquiao realized the urgency and gave horn a beating in round 9, which could have gone 10-8. But horn's power how he penetrated pacquiao's defence and that right straight and he was looking for. Pacquiao started to come back later on but it was too late. A lot of close rounds cos of pacquiao's defence but horn landed majority of the hits and especially when you see pacquiao miss alot of his hits. I wouldn't be upset if it was a draw. but that 117-111 was way too wide, but he fell for the action from horn and scored it that way.

Same, horn moves way to much I think it's because of pacquiao's lack of action made horn fight good and landed those shots. But he moves way too much. I also didn't like horn holding too much.

Yes, calling it a robbery is injustice.

OMG    I hate pacquiao now, he is just too old and just nothing left of him.

Man horn suprised me, he was moving alot, his head movement was exagerated and that worked and horn jumped into pacquiao and just messed him apart. A majority of horn's shots just got passed pacquiao's defence.

Althought the headbutts, which pacquiao got 2 massive shots on the head really long and deep.

Pacquiao peformed very very very badly, he had the occasional onslaughts got the hits, but he just was performing badly, he had no fire, no guts, it was like 100% caution no risk taken, I just am so mad at pacquiao even though it is just his age.

But horn is so poweful and managed to crack into pacquiao, the uppercuts.

props to horn.  I feel that because of horn's excessive head movements made it hard for pacquiao because pacquiao is looking for a target but if it's moving pacquiao finds it difficult to unleash his combo.

There was a moment in the fight where horn was gassed and was just a sitting duck and pacquiao took him but couldn't knock him, but he did give him a beating that the ref warned horn that if he does not show he can still hold his own he will stop the fight and horn ended up winning the next round.

But horn did win fair and square, anyone who says its was a bad decision, didn't watch the fight or his enitre focus was on pacquiao. I love pacquiao but i didn't see anything special from pacquiao, no risks no combos no nothing and that left himself open to horns powerful and precise shots.

I watched the boxnation version and the american version espn were favouring pacquiao and would make their commentary to claim that pacquiao is winning, i have seen this with hbo too such as ward vs kovalev, so have to becareful when listening to these commentary. ofc espn would say such stuff they were giving pacquiao unfair assessment of being in the lead when he wasn't.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVHgepTmjTs" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVHgepTmjTs</a>

Just to sum up if I can, pacquiao's age showed he didn't do any agressive combos, angles but horn had good head movements and powerful hits that sometimes I question if pacquiao is letting them through or what. Pacquiao's defence was average at best if not below.

 

Pacquiao should retire or prove that the first fight was a mistake and beat him badly in the rematch.

Good explanation of how kovalev should have gone about the low blow's from andre ward like you said, take a knee and then complain.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b576uolBiio" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b576uolBiio</a>

Man germany got a solid team, good defence and so good passing and offence. That's the big difference between a good team and england  . The team's are aware of their player's location and have excellent passing and offensive manouvres.

such great goals by germany, they will win the cup.

Date: 27/06/2017
Soreness: none
BW: 59.5kg

Warm up
   uphill walk 20mins
   mobility and activation stretches

Workout
   empty bar jump squats 3 x 5
   half squats 50kg x 5, 70kg x 5, 80kg x 2 x 7
   calf raises 70kg x 5, 80kg x 2 x 20
   RDL 80kg x 2 x 7

Cool down
  stretches

Comment
I wasn't feeling that well, little sore throat so did 2 sets instead.