Show Posts
12766
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: December 11, 2015, 03:55:26 pm »^Interesting idea about the jump sequence simulation. Everyone should have it match his own jumping sets-reps? e.g. what i do when i jump is sets of 3-4 , 1 min between reps, 4-5 mins between sets.
nice ya.. even more specificity per jumper. That makes even more sense. We should create a thread which contains everyone's max jump session protocols, since everyone performs them a little differently.
edit: http://www.adarq.org/strength-power-reactivity-speed-discussion/how-do-you-perform-a-max-effort-jump-session/
Quote
And maybe use supramax partials instead of fulls for this tool?
I wouldn't do those supramax partials (quarters if you half, halfs if you deep) unless you spend a few weeks prepping them. If we just jump right into those, could cause way too much fatigue than we want. Even then, not sure if it would be better than your "go-to" ROM.
Maybe even better would be banded singles, since you can accommodate the strength curve.
Quote
Think a fancy name for it and blog this idea. Like CPJSM ( Cns Pattern Jump Simulation Method ) , or JSDCM ( Jumping Sequence Deep Copy Method , geek term included, you know you like it).
lool @ the deep copy nerd one.
I like CPJSM better ;f
without any jumping references: CNS Temporal-Amplitude Model .. so a model instead of a method, since we're modeling based on time/effort of a max jump session (or maybe even other things).
pc!!
