Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - adarqui

Pages: 1 ... 838 839 [840] 841 842 ... 1505
12586
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: December 25, 2015, 01:12:13 am »
12/24/2015

Bio: Morning

sleep = 7 hr
wakeup = 8 AM
bw = 157 lb
morning resting heart rate = didn't measure
soreness = FULL BODY SORENESS. chest, triceps, biceps, hamstrings, glutes, abdominals, calves, traps, neck
aches = right elbow slightly
injuries = some toe nails



Session: Afternoon

run:
- 8.27 mi in 1:15:11
- slow
- midfoot/forefoot
- upper body/neck so sore it was torture :p



Food

3 PM

- 1 x greek yogurt




wasn't going to run tonight.. but had a power outage which was scheduled to take ~2 hours to fix.. so went out and did another run



Session: Evening

run:
- 5.04 mi in 43:54
- slow, super depleted
- soreness was alot better though.. which is cool

post-run bw:
- 150 eheh



Food

- chicken breast
- stir fry veggies
- some brie and crackers
- a few olives



Food

- 2 x greek yogurt



Food

- 1 x orange juice
- 1 x greek yogurt



would like to do some BW stuff again tomorrow.. not sure if park will be open though.. also not sure if i'll be sore as hell.

gn

12587
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: December 25, 2015, 01:06:05 am »
Andrew, really appreciate the time you put into that post.  That link was also a good read.  One question I have after digesting all of that is:

Does the concentrated loading block HAVE to be accumulated fatigue from high volume/high intensity weight room training?  Can't the accumulated fatigue in this block be from a mixture of high intensity weight room stuff AND high intensity plyo's (volume split between the two)?  Because bottom line, the fatigue accumulated that creates supercompensation is CNS fatigue and both weights AND high intensity plyo's can induce this CNS fatigue (thus reducing maximal and especially explosive strength) right?

yo sorry will try to reply tomorrow. :/

12588
Olympic Weightlifting / Re: IWF World Champs 2016
« on: December 24, 2015, 02:20:00 pm »
Lochev got caught using some GNRH analogue - record stripped   :-\

eehh.

 :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\

12589
Peer Reviewed Studies Discussion / Re: icing
« on: December 24, 2015, 12:24:09 am »

12590
Peer Reviewed Studies Discussion / Re: icing
« on: December 24, 2015, 12:23:42 am »
http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/48/7/596.1.short

THE EFFECT OF CRYOTHERAPY APPLICATION TO THE ANKLE JOINT ON DYNAMIC POSTURAL STABILITY IN AN ELITE ATHLETIC POPULATION

K Fullam1, B Caulfield1, GF Coughlan2, E Delahunt1,3
+ Author Affiliations

1School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Population Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
2Irish Rugby Football Union, Dublin, Ireland
3Institute for Sport and Health, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

Quote
Abstract
Background Decreased postural stability is a primary risk factor for lower limb musculoskeletal injuries. During athletic competitions, cryotherapy may be applied during short breaks in play or during half-time; however its effects on postural stability remain unclear.

Objective To investigate the acute effects of a 15-minute ankle joint cryotherapy application on dynamic postural stability.

Design Experimental study.

Setting University biomechanics laboratory.

Participants 29 elite level collegiate male field-sport athletes.

Interventions Participants were tested on the anterior (ANT), posterior-lateral (PL) and posterior-medial (PM) reach directions of the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) both pre- and post- a 15-minute ankle joint cryotherapy application.

Main outcome measurements Normalized reach distances, along with sagittal plane kinematics of the hip, knee and ankle joints, as well as associated MVELO and AREAsw of the center-of-pressure (COP) path during the performance of the ANT, PL and PM reach directions of the SEBT.

Results There was a statistically significant decrease in ANT, PL and PM reach direction reach distance scores from pre-cryotherapy to post-cryotherapy (P≤.05). No significant differences were observed in hip, knee or ankle joint sagittal plane kinematics (P≥.05). There was a significant decrease in MVELO of the COP path from pre-cryotherapy to post-cryotherapy (P≤.05) in all reach directions (P≤.05). AREAsw of the COP path was significantly decreased from pre-cryotherapy to post-cryotherapy in the ANT and PM reach directions (P≥.05).

Conclusions The results of the present study indicate that dynamic postural stability is adversely affected immediately following cryotherapy application to the ankle joint.

12591
Peer Reviewed Studies Discussion / Re: icing
« on: December 24, 2015, 12:19:51 am »
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/S00421-013-2693-9

Effect of cryotherapy on muscle recovery and inflammation following a bout of damaging exercise

Quote
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of cryotherapy on the inflammatory response to muscle-damaging exercise using a randomized trial. Twenty recreationally active males completed a 40-min run at a −10 % grade to induce muscle damage. Ten of the subjects were immersed in a 5 °C ice bath for 20 min and the other ten served as controls. Knee extensor peak torque, soreness rating, and thigh circumference were obtained pre- and post-run, and 1, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h post-run. Blood samples were obtained pre- and post-run, and 1, 6 and 24 h post-run for assay of plasma chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2). Peak torque decreased from 270 ± 57 Nm at baseline to 253 ± 65 Nm post-run and increased to 295 ± 68 Nm by 72 h post-run with no differences between groups (p = 0.491). Soreness rating increased from 3.6 ± 6.0 mm out of 100 mm at baseline to 47.4 ± 28.2 mm post-run and remained elevated at all time points with no differences between groups (p = 0.696). CCL2 concentrations increased from 116 ± 31 pg mL−1 at baseline to 293 ± 109 pg mL−1 at 6 h post-run (control) and from 100 ± 27 pg mL−1 at baseline to 208 ± 71 pg mL−1 at 6 h post-run (cryotherapy). The difference between groups was not significant (p = 0.116), but there was a trend for lower CCL2 in the cryotherapy group at 6 h (p = 0.102), though this measure was highly variable. In conclusion, 20 min of cryotherapy was ineffective in attenuating the strength decrement and soreness seen after muscle-damaging exercise, but may have mitigated the rise in plasma CCL2 concentration. These results do not support the use of cryotherapy during recovery.

12592
Peer Reviewed Studies Discussion / Re: icing
« on: December 24, 2015, 12:18:42 am »
http://www.e-jot.com/article/S2214-031X(14)00016-3/abstract

Cryotherapy suppresses tendon inflammation in an animal model

Summary
Cryotherapy (or cold treatment) has been a popular treatment to relieve pain caused by injuries to tissues such as tendons. However, the exact mechanisms behind the beneficial effects of cryotherapy in tendons remain largely unclear. As prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is known to be a major mediator of acute inflammation in tissues, which is related to tissue pain, we hypothesized that the beneficial effects of cryotherapy in tendons are mediated by downregulation of PGE2 levels. To test this hypothesis, we applied cold treatment to mouse patellar and Achilles tendons using two animal models: exhaustive mouse treadmill running and acute mouse tendon injury by needle penetration. We then measured the levels of PGE2 and protein expression levels of COX-2, an enzyme responsible for PGE2 production in tissues, under both experimental conditions. We found that treadmill running increased PGE2 levels in both patellar and Achilles tendons compared to control mice without running. Cold treatment for 30 min after treadmill running was sufficient to reduce PGE2 levels to near baseline control levels in both tendons. An extension of cold treatment to 60 min resulted only in a marginal decrease in patellar tendons, but a marked decrease in Achilles tendons. Moreover, COX-2 protein levels in both tendons were also lowered by cold treatment, suggesting that the reduction of PGE2 levels in tendons by cold treatment is at least in part due to the decreased COX-2 expression. Similarly, in the acutely injured tendons, 30 min of cold treatment after needle penetration reduced PGE2 levels when compared to the controls at room temperature (22°C). This decrease was sustained up to at least 3 h after the administration of cryotherapy. Given that PGE2 is a known pain sensitiser, the results of this study suggest that the ability of cold treatment to reduce pain may be attributable to its ability to decrease PGE2 production in tendons[/quote]

12593
Peer Reviewed Studies Discussion / Re: icing
« on: December 24, 2015, 12:15:26 am »
http://www.fasebj.org/content/29/1_Supplement/826.5.short

The Effects of Topical Icing After Contusion Injury on Angiogenesis in Regenerating Skeletal Muscle
Jonathan Peake1, Daniel Singh1, Zohreh Barani Lonbani1, Mia Woodruff1 and Roland Steck1
+ Author Affiliations

1Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Australia
Abstract

Quote
We investigated the effects of topical icing after muscle contusion injury on angiogenesis in regenerating skeletal muscle. Male Wistar rats were subjected to contusion injury by dropping a cylindrical-shaped weight (370 g) on the biceps femoris muscle of one leg. Within 5 min after injury, a block of ice (contained within a paper cup) was applied to the skin surrounding the muscle for 20 min. Control groups received no ice treatment. The rats were euthanized at 1, 3, 7 and 28 days post-injury (n=24 per time point). In 12 rats in each group, a punch biopsy (diameter: 8 mm) was taken from the region of injury and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin. Tissue sections (5 μm) were then mounted on glass slides for immunohistochemical analysis of CD68+ macrophages, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and von Willebrand's factor (vWF). After euthanasia, the others rats in each group were flushed with heparinized saline, and then perfused with a radio-opaque contrast agent using an infusion pump. Muscle biopsies were also collected from these rats, and analyzed to determine blood vessel volume and number using high resolution micro computed tomography. Macrophage numbers were lower at all time points, VEGF expression and vessel number were lower at 3 days and vWF expression and vessel volume were lower at 3 and 7 days post-injury in the icing group versus the non-icing group (p<0.05). By contrast, VEGF expression and vessel number were higher at 28 days post-injury in the icing group versus the non-icing group (p<0.05). In conclusion, topical icing suppressed inflammation but also delayed angiogenesis in regenerating muscle. These findings challenge the practice of using ice to treat muscle injuries.

12594
Peer Reviewed Studies Discussion / Re: icing
« on: December 24, 2015, 12:14:04 am »
http://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/Abstract/2013/05000/Topical_Cooling__Icing__Delays_Recovery_From.24.aspx

Topical Cooling (Icing) Delays Recovery From Eccentric Exercise–Induced Muscle Damage

Tseng, Ching-Yu1; Lee, Jo-Ping2; Tsai, Yung-Shen2; Lee, Shin-Da3; Kao, Chung-Lan4; Liu, Te-Chih2; Lai, Cheng- Hsiu2; Harris, M. Brennan5; Kuo, Chia-Hua1,3

Collapse BoxAbstract
Quote
Abstract: Tseng, C-Y, Lee, J-P, Tsai, Y-S, Lee, S-D, Kao, C-L, Liu, T-C, Lai, C-S, Harris, MB, and Kuo, C-H. Topical Cooling (Icing) Delays Recovery From Eccentric Exercise–Induced Muscle Damage. J Strength Cond Res 27(5): 1354–1361, 2013—It is generally thought that topical cooling can interfere with blood perfusion and may have positive effects on recovery from a traumatic challenge. This study examined the influence of topical cooling on muscle damage markers and hemodynamic changes during recovery from eccentric exercise. Eleven male subjects (age 20.2 ± 0.3 years) performed 6 sets of elbow extension at 85% maximum voluntary load and randomly assigned to topical cooling or sham groups during recovery in a randomized crossover fashion. Cold packs were applied to exercised muscle for 15 minutes at 0, 3, 24, 48, and 72 hours after exercise. The exercise significantly elevated circulating creatine kinase-MB isoform (CK-MB) and myoglobin levels. Unexpectedly, greater elevations in circulating CK-MB and myoglobin above the control level were noted in the cooling trial during 48–72 hours of the post-exercise recovery period. Subjective fatigue feeling was greater at 72 hours after topical cooling compared with controls. Removal of the cold pack also led to a protracted rebound in muscle hemoglobin concentration compared with controls. Measures of interleukin (IL)-8, IL-10, IL-1β, and muscle strength during recovery were not influenced by cooling. A peak shift in IL-12p70 was noted during recovery with topical cooling. These data suggest that topical cooling, a commonly used clinical intervention, seems to not improve but rather delay recovery from eccentric exercise–induced muscle damage.

12595
Peer Reviewed Studies Discussion / icing
« on: December 24, 2015, 12:12:02 am »
studies related to icing for injuries, recovery, etc.

12596
Injury, Prehab, & Rehab talk for the brittlebros / Re: Icing
« on: December 24, 2015, 12:11:30 am »
real quick reply: ice has helped me a ton (mostly for tendon/bone issues, not recovery/muscle soreness). i've used it successfully many times (throughout the years), to speed up recovery/reduce pain.

icing can definitely make you feel stiff up to 10-15 minutes after, but, as time goes on I actually end up feeling better.

we need an "icing thread" in peer reviewed section. I imagine there's lots of positive results regarding recovery/reduction of inflammation etc.

pc!

12597
800m+ Running and/or Conditioning / Re: Misc Running Videos
« on: December 23, 2015, 11:31:39 pm »
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itahv9PL5rA" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itahv9PL5rA</a>

100 miles 11:40:55 damn

100 miles on a track................ WTF?!?!?!?!?!  :o

impressive, but insane.. wow

12598
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: December 23, 2015, 11:28:54 pm »
Hey Andrew,

You're well versed in the works of Verk, Siff, Zats...  I wanna hear your thoughts on concentrated loading blocks...

more versed with verk but not as much as I used to be that's for sure. ;/



Quote
How long is too long of a block?  Is a concentrated loading block of ~2 months productive?  Most people seem to do 3-4 weeks it seems, but if maximal strength continues to slowly increase throughout the 2 months (while explosive strength and speed obviously suffers), I would imagine a longer loading block can still work?

Is the supercompensation curve pretty much equivalent to the length of the concentrated block?

Obviously this can't be the case forever, for example, concentrated loading block for 1 year leading to 1 year supercompensation loll

yo Merrick,

here's a few quotes from SSTM: (direct quotes and some elaboration in parenthesis)

Quote
The formation of LDTE (long-lasting delayed training effect aka supercompensation) develops in two phases. In the first phase (t1), in which the athlete is using the concentrated strength loads (A), the levels of Maximal and Explosive strength go down, in the second phase (t2), where is observed the LDTE (supercompensation), these two levels rapidly rise.

The lower the strength parameters fall (within an optimal range) during the first phase (concentrated block A), the higher they subsequently rise in the LDTE phase (next block, block B for example).

An excessive volume of concentrated strength loads (A) results in a significant drop in the athletes state and, as a rule, a disruption of adaptation.

The duration of the LDTE is determined by the volume and by the length of cncentrated strength loads (stage A). In general, the phase of LDTE realization (t2) is equal to the duration of the precedent phase (t1). The optimum duration of the concentration stage of strength loads (block A), which assures the fullest use of the adaptive potential of the athlete's organism and the greatest increase of strength parameters in the subsequent period, ranges from 6-12 weeks.

During the phase of loading (A) and decreasing strength parameters (t1), the athletes has a difficulty to execute the competition exercise with the correct technique and with high level of power output.

A low volume of speed-strength exercises, carried out by gradually increasing their intensity, creates a favorable condition to the realization of the LDTE in the subsequent period (B).

-- p129, 5.4.1 Origin and Evolution of BTS

I edited some image I found online to mimic mostly the image in the book:
- A = concentrated strength block
- B = speed strength block, realization of the LDTE (supercompensation from block A)
- t1 = basically the area under A
- t2 = basically the area under B





So ya, the supercompensation is roughly equal to the length of the concentrated strength block. However, if Maximal Strength is slowly improving during the concentrated strength block (A), it means this athlete is either:
- not training at high enough intensity & volume
- more of an beginner or intermediate trainee, not advanced

The idea of this TRUE concentrated strength block (and not just high frequency training) is basically the same as a effect of one single intense training session, which causes a supercompensation 48-72 hours after the training session. Instead of causing say, a 3-6% dip in performance/strength over 1 training session, we're causing it over 1-12 weeks. I put 1-12 instead of 6-12 because there are several SHORT concentrated strength programs out there which range anywhere from 7 days, 14 days, 4 weeks, etc. You don't find many over 4 weeks because I think those smaller concentrated blocks are "safer" for intermediate & advanced athletes alike. Causing fatigue for 6-12 weeks is going to make most people question what they are doing, unless they have a great coach guiding them.

There's some generic patterns for implementing concentrated blocks & their subsequent blocks in the Block Training System: SSTM p139, 5.4.3

A = concentrated strength block for example. Activates the adaptation process in the athlete's organism and provokes the subsequent morphological-functional changes in those physiological systems, which are involved in the competition exercise. Verk goes on to say that maximal effort in the competition exercise itself is discouraged due to the fatigue you are placing on the organism; so for example, no max effort sprinting, throwing, etc.
B = Aimed at gradually increasing the power of the work in the specific regime. Speed-strength/Explosive strength exercises for power athletes, Local Muscular Endurance for endurance athletes etc.
C = Focused on technical work at competition intensity. "The athlete should gradually achieve the maximum level of power output in the competition exercises" etc.

These are all divided up amongst the year:
- A,B,C,A1,B1,C1
- A,B,C,A1,C1,B1,C2
- A,B,A1,C,A2,C1
- A,B,C <-- 12 week concentrated strength block
- A,B,C (with A1)
- A,B,(with A1) C (with A2)

That's just an example (without much detail) of how they organize these blocks during a year with all different types of competition calendars.



here's some more info on application of it.. can't find his concentrated squat routine online. He has a 7-day and 14-day squat routine in SSTM.

- http://www.verkhoshansky.com/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=clYVxxjc%2BQ8%3D&tabid=80&mid=435



I had a 2 week squat routine I did a few times, was super simple.. I think I lost the original post of it - think it may have been on theverticalsummit.

Remind me to post his 7 or 14 day micro in here if I don't (tmw).

pc!!!

12599
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: December 23, 2015, 10:14:14 pm »
12/23/2015

Bio: Morning

sleep = 7 hr
wakeup = 8 AM
bw = 157 lb
morning resting heart rate = didn't measure
soreness = abdominals, calves (left especially)
aches = left lower back slightly, right elbow slightly, left shin slightly
injuries = some toe nails

miracles = left hamstring tendon hasn’t bothered me today.. whew



Food

- 1 x orange juice
- 1 x greek yogurt



Session: Morning

1 hour bodyweight strength training
- lots of fun stuff
- dips on one bar were tough, got 5 my first time though
- dip walks are tough
- can’t L-sit from dip bars or pulp bars
- single arm bodyweight row/pull is pretty cool, did it bent legs
- did a bunch of assisted single leg squats
- pullup variations, pushup variations, tricep dips etc

skinny-swole at the end.



Food

- 1 x chocolate soy milk



Food

- 1 x greek yogurt
- some black beans and quinoa



Session: Evening

run: testing out garmin GPS, CS-1
- ran ok but tight
- set the pace to beep if I go above 6:30 min/mile
- started the watch right away, not a great idea, because the watch starts beeping at me right away
- next time I need to do my warmup run first, then start the watch.. had to cross a busy intersection which is usually part of my warmup run on this route, so lost like ~20s heh.



Food

- some steamed broccoli
- lots of mini tortilla chips and spicy guac
- chicken veggie sandwich on wheat + shredded parmesan
- then unfortunately pigged out on chocolates and 3 scoops of vanilla bean ice cream .. bad



i like this watch.. with the pace alarms, it’s going to be like a coach hovering over my shoulder. And the data it provides is very useful.


some example stats generated from the run:






12600
800m+ Running and/or Conditioning / Re: Various Running Articles
« on: December 23, 2015, 07:23:39 pm »
tips on not being a slave to your garmin watch

http://runnersconnect.net/coach-corner/dont-be-a-slave-to-your-garmin/

Pages: 1 ... 838 839 [840] 841 842 ... 1505