Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - adarqui

Pages: 1 ... 725 726 [727] 728 729 ... 1505
10891
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Scooby 2011 Journal
« on: August 16, 2016, 03:09:42 am »
cool!! very curious to see how it goes..

pc!

10892
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Scooby 2011 Journal
« on: August 16, 2016, 01:22:15 am »
i commented on your youtube video .. but worth commenting here.

One thing I just found interesting is ... i've made similar videos as you (lots of misses/attempts), but with one obvious difference: all of mine were self lobs. So that's kind of an interesting concept.

We both took two different courses with trying to dunk.. I definitely think I gave myself an advantage by utilizing lobs instead of dribble ups, in addition to my advantage in height etc.. I absolutely hate dribble up dunks and that's why you rarely see them in any of my footage. So by me constantly throwing lobs, like you do dribble ups, I think the odds would be with the lobber, given equal volume.

I'd like to eventually see a video like this, but, everything a self lob.. one day please do it :) Consider it a request. I don't remember you ever making a lob video like that, if not I apologize.

It would be interesting to compare those videos.. I imagine in the lob video, you'd be jumping higher on average, and if you start getting into a groove with your lob, you would probably have some nasty hard throw down misses (and maybe a make).

pc!

10893
Sports Discussion / Re: 2016 Rio Olympics - open thread
« on: August 16, 2016, 12:49:22 am »
the raw image from the info-graphic i posted earlier.. kinda cool just to see it as an image, zoomed out.


10894
Sports Discussion / Re: 2016 Rio Olympics - open thread
« on: August 16, 2016, 12:46:48 am »



10895
Sports Discussion / Re: 2016 Rio Olympics - open thread
« on: August 16, 2016, 12:43:45 am »
OMFG THAT DIVE.. amazing women's 400m final.

Aghh, I wish she hadn't fallen and won it running through....she might have got it anyway but I've seen it happen where a dive at the finish probably makes the difference.

ya after watching the replay, it looked like she didn't need to dive. when I saw it live, it looked like the dive won it for her. When Felix was coming back to (almost?) take the lead, it was nuts - i was freaking out.

10896
Sports Discussion / Re: 2016 Rio Olympics - open thread
« on: August 15, 2016, 10:12:16 pm »
OMFG THAT DIVE.. amazing women's 400m final.

10897
Sports Discussion / Re: 2016 Rio Olympics - open thread
« on: August 15, 2016, 08:53:32 pm »

10898
Sports Discussion / Re: 2016 Rio Olympics - open thread
« on: August 15, 2016, 08:52:45 pm »
^^ or deion sanders / bo jackson.

Lebron and AI were both basketball + football stars in h.s. We'll probably see far less 2-sport athletes where one of their 2 is NFL football.. with all of the risks involved, just focus on the less dangerous sport.

10899
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: August 15, 2016, 02:06:57 pm »
Is self lobbing for a sl jump just as easy for you?

i think so. tbh it might be a little easier because of the horizontal distance I get with single leg jumping. When starting to train SLRVJ in late 2011/2012, even in my first few sessions I literally caught some lobs around the outside of the paint. That is very difficult for me to do with DLRVJ because I just don't have that kind of horizontal distance with double leg jumping.

so ya, just as easy or slightly easier.

pc!

10900
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: August 15, 2016, 02:31:03 am »
08/14/2016

Bio: Morning

last night's sleep: ~8 hours
last night fell asleep: ~4 AM
wakeup = 12 PM
bw = 149 lb.
morning resting heart rate = didn't measure
soreness = none
aches = left ankle slightly
injuries = none
standing desk (when on computer): none
feel = good
water = alot



Food

12:30 PM

- 2 x wheat bread with peanut butter
- banana
- green tea
- a few banana bites
- beet + tart cherry juice



Food

4 PM

- banan bites
- 2% milk with 2 tspn coffee


Session: Evening

6 PM

court 1: 1/2 hour
- did a really nice warmup.. ankles stiff/left ankle bugging a bit initially, but then worked itself out
- courts were so crowded..
- did a few light jumps, was getting up good.
- figured i'd go to a completely different park and try to land some dunks .. was too crowded to dunk at this park


6:30 PM

court2:
- ~10 minute warmup
- a few jumps: ~10'8"
- ~6 dunk attempts
- last dunk attempt I hurt my right index finger, left heal, and left quad ... haha.. right index finger is the same finger I broke doing that 360 attempt way back, I think
- worried about the heal, hope that doesn't flare up again.

half squat:
- 9 sets, different feet position every set 3 sets, repeated 3 times
- 1. semi-wide:             135 lb. x 10
- 2. close:                     135 lb. x 10
- 3. feet-together:         135 lb. x 10
- 4. semi-wide:             135 lb. x 10
- 5. close:                    135 lb. x 10
- 6. feet-together:         135 lb. x 10
- 7. semi-wide: fast:     135 lb. x 10
- 8. close: fast:             135 lb. x 10
- 9. feet-together: fast: 135 lb. x 10

also supersetted each of those sets with some kind of plate swing and/or plate holds with a 45 lb. plate. the holds were brutal.

neutral grip pullups: 2 x 6


oh snap.. a jump video.. been 4+ years!!! HEHE!!!!

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_hib2RIRvU" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_hib2RIRvU</a>

my favorite thing in that video is my first runup + jump .. that looked pretty damn good tbh. Just need to build more power now too. If I had jumped that good during my dunk attempts today, I would have thrown a few down hard.

i'm happy with my slrvj right now.. I think there's a ton of room for progress if I can just stay healthy and also stay patient.

Also, I really need to figure out what's going on with my video camera. I fixed that auto-focus issue.. but when I watch that video, I see some small glitches/speedups.. really annoying.



Food

8 PM

- 2% milk
- watermelon
- blueberries
- banana
- greek yogurt



Food

10 PM

- 2% milk
- vegan-fudge brownie



Food

2:30 AM

- some mixed nuts
- propel
- greek yogurt



heel is tender.. ffffuuuu.

pc!

10901
when i read that article, all i can think of is kingfish.
Squat daily! 4xxlbs Plus is attainable!
 :raging:

but that HIIT shit... is really crazy shxt that really hurt me to some extend.
having said that, one of my friend is asking me to do it with him tomorrow...
(and have all u can eat sushi afterward....  )
 :trollface:

eat sushi first.. then do HIIT.  :trollface:


I like every day squatting.. but I also don't think it has to be as heavy as most people prescribe.

going light mostly every day, and heavy during more important sessions, is probably much more effective for ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE than going heavy every single day. Going heavy every day will make you a much better weightlifter/powerlifter, and also possibly burn you out.. Knowing your body and how you recover is absolutely essential. But for athleticism??? Squatting light every day using a variety of set/rep schemes is probably even more effective .. because we're just talking about stimulating the cns without taxing it, recruiting motor units, causing some small amounts of hypertrophy, great for recovery, targeting key muscle groups (p-chain, quads, core), improving strength & depending on what set/rep/tempo schemes you use - also improving explosive strength etc.

It's kind of like if we were to jump/sprint every day.. does it have to be max effort? it most likely can't be.. risk of injury increases considerably.. so if someone does daily sessions (incorporating rest when needed), many of them will have to be submax.. but then out of nowhere you will feel amazing and want to push yourself to the max. Same concept would apply to lifting every day; mostly submax, then push yourself (max or training max (no psyche up etc)) when you feel great.

pc!

10902
Sports Discussion / Re: 2016 Rio Olympics - open thread
« on: August 15, 2016, 01:53:07 am »
LMAO i have a strong prejudice against olympic swimming because of the australian obsession with the 'sport' .. even worse than acole i think, cos I dont even try to be balanced about it. bolt all the way. However, i love the idea of comparing athletes .. who is the greatest of all time? Who even makes the top 5? Does Lebron make the cut?

damn .. why'd you have to bring lebron into this? lulz.



from an article LBSS linked on fb:



sick!@@!$

http://screengrabber.deadspin.com/wayde-van-niekerk-smashes-michael-johnsons-17-year-old-1785282344?utm_campaign=socialflow_deadspin_facebook&utm_source=deadspin_facebook&utm_medium=socialflow

10903
Sports Discussion / Re: 2016 Rio Olympics - open thread
« on: August 15, 2016, 01:00:43 am »
kingfish motivated me to find more of those bolt smiling pics.. he's basically creating meme's as he destroys people.











 :ibrunning:

10904
Sports Discussion / Re: 2016 Rio Olympics - open thread
« on: August 15, 2016, 12:53:38 am »

so crazy.. was shocking.. he just kept flying the last 100m.

ya i've never run track so i don't REALLY know the significance of lane 8.. must be hard af (nearly impossible) to mostly "race yourself" and still get a WR.

Yeah, traditionally athletes hate to be in the outside.  It depends on the sprinter of course - but since I never had any kick I always wanted to be inside of a rival on the turn, that way I could catch up, pass them, and come into the straight ahead and try to hold on...   Mentally I would always rather give my opponent a "head start" than have a head start and have to run a farther distance after head start.  Basically imagine if you have to race someone equal to yourself...  You can have two choices  - run with a 10m headstart but weights on your body that slow you down by 10m or give him the 10m head start with weights on...  Obviously both are fair but mentally we would rather be the "faster" athlete with the disadvantage than the "slower" athlete with the advantage...

Truth be told though - the farther outside the lane the easier the race.  All things equal you would rather be outside as much as possible because you are running more straights and less curves...   The inside lanes have a sharper curve so you have to turn far more.  IF (and it's a big IF) you can get past the mental block of being ahead and alone on the outside then lane 8 is a big advantage.. I think that's what we just saw.  WVN is so strong that he basically flew out of the blocks and didn't look back  - not having to turn as much as the other athletes provided him with a world record time...   You can really see this when you watch his last turn and how close he was to the inside of his lane the whole time.  Obviously you want to run on the inside of your lane the entire time - BUT on the tight curve you can't produce power and stay inside the whole time, a powerful long stride sends you to the outside in a tight turn and you end up running farther.  Technically WVN DID probably run a shorter total distance than everyone else...  But not cause he ran less than 400m.  Because of the turns nobody can run in exactly the same place in their lane the whole time, maybe WVN ran "only" 402 meters while the others ran 405 meters..

nice thanks for the info.



Quote
i was thinking about the possibility of a short track.. deliberate or a mistake. If IOC wanted records to drop, could shorten it slightly every year.. even the pool.

but, in terms of this actual olympics.. I think if the track was actually shorter, we'd see better times in everything.. 10k / 1500m especially, etc. iirc, I don't think we've seen that kind of improvement. Also if it is short, it isn't short where the 100m was... hehe.

i won't even consider it until there's some serious proof floating around.. Niekerk's performance was mindblowing.

pc!

Lol, you never ran track but you just provided the best proof possible as to why the track can't possibly be short.  I didn't even think of the longer races..   The 10k is 25 laps!  If the track was a couple meters short those guys would be running 50m less than usual - they would ALL pr.  If we don't see that we can put to rest the ridiculous idea of a short track...
[/quote]

ya, I just figured i'd find the longest race on the track and see if it was "fast". that 10k was slow.

i'd be curious to see how many athletes set PB's. so far, just seems like a pretty normal set of numbers.. other than these few outliers from freaks.



Quote
However, if you want plausible conspiracy theories you can imagine some doctoring that would produce faster times.  The most obvious is having the back straight be slightly downhill.  There is some maximum elevation change that can occur between any two points on the track but you can imagine if you were slightly above the rule you could help guys on the back straight..   The other obvious thing to do is just run from the wrong start points.  The three staggers on most tracks are for 200m (3.5 meters per lane), 400m (7 meters per lane) and 3 turn 4x400 (10.5 meters per lane)...  I have been at all comer meets where they wind was strong so they ran the 200m on the first 200m of the track and accidently used the 400m start lines and everybody PRed..  I still would bet against any such thing happening in rio. 


Quote
Sounds more like American haters who can't stand to see Michael Johnsons record broken.  Why should we be surprised when WVN is the ONLY person ever to run sub 10, sub 20 and sub 44...  IMO that alone makes him arguably the greatest - I'm hoping he adds the 200m to his events for future competitions and dominantes. 

that is NUTS. if he wasn't on the "mainstream map", he sure is now.. what a beast.


Quote
Also, the IAAF is REALLY strict about sanctioning tracks - they check to make sure the track is super level, measured perfectly, etc.

nice!

10905
Sports Discussion / Re: 2016 Rio Olympics - open thread
« on: August 15, 2016, 12:46:08 am »
Bolt v Phelps.. no contest.



epic pic.. lmao@!#!@$!@$!@$!

Pages: 1 ... 725 726 [727] 728 729 ... 1505