106
Article & Video Discussion / Re: Thirteen Iowa football players admitted to hospital with "undisclosed illnesses"
« on: March 24, 2011, 07:21:34 pm »
how arent these guys fired?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
107
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Calfs
« on: March 23, 2011, 11:11:55 pm »
Jack, do you view them superior to other forms of glute activation pre workout (glute bridge holds etc)?
What duration do you normally do them for/weight?
What duration do you normally do them for/weight?
108
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: March 23, 2011, 08:52:54 pm »
nice thats quite the coincidence, is it this one? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQa1NZWgRis
109
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: March 23, 2011, 07:25:44 pm »
sick pics man...in the words of wayne the sky is the limit
110
Article & Video Discussion / Re: The "glute guy" praises the quads & calfs - quadNation 4 lyfe.
« on: March 23, 2011, 01:17:32 pm »
good points..but people that are concerned with more than just DLRVJ and VJ (sports sprinting whatever) should not just jump on the quad nation gravy train IMO
111
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: March 23, 2011, 12:55:13 pm »
something about elasticity maybe adarq? Any merit to high rep claf raises/quarter squats (similar to defranco 50 rep rhythm squats)
112
Basketball / Re: BYU suspension
« on: March 22, 2011, 08:34:01 pm »
i definitely agree girls want sex and crave it the same or more as guys, its just the whole social slut thing.
man once girls get passed that though..
man once girls get passed that though..
113
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Calfs
« on: March 22, 2011, 08:14:20 pm »
axel might have borrowed that from James smith on elitefts..or vice versa
or maybe axel=JS
but yea people love to classify calfs as the devil
or maybe axel=JS
but yea people love to classify calfs as the devil
114
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Calfs
« on: March 22, 2011, 04:27:26 pm »
lance how do you prefer to train calves for max strength?
115
Basketball / Re: BYU suspension
« on: March 22, 2011, 07:09:38 am »
exactly which is my whole point; women don't care as much about abstaining because a)its viewed negatively to do it and b) it is easy to obtain
117
Basketball / Re: BYU suspension
« on: March 21, 2011, 11:40:25 pm »
well he has a point
psychological, by men having sex or hooking up with girls, they are achieving something and will be patted out the back by their buddies
on the other hand, if women hook up with guys, it is "slutty" and does not really require any work or effort per se.
Not to mention so many females are actually so inexperienced with their bodies, IE never orgasmed or anything. Guys on the other hand..
side note-there is a mythical age where the tables change and the girls chase the guys by any means in order to get married. Or at least the guys with stable jobs. I was referring to more 16-27 or so range.
psychological, by men having sex or hooking up with girls, they are achieving something and will be patted out the back by their buddies
on the other hand, if women hook up with guys, it is "slutty" and does not really require any work or effort per se.
Not to mention so many females are actually so inexperienced with their bodies, IE never orgasmed or anything. Guys on the other hand..
side note-there is a mythical age where the tables change and the girls chase the guys by any means in order to get married. Or at least the guys with stable jobs. I was referring to more 16-27 or so range.
118
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Calfs
« on: March 21, 2011, 11:35:42 pm »
i say why not train them? Unless your crazy and kill yourself maxing out on calf raises(never heard of that) its not going to take away from your other training(squats,jumps) and could be that missing link..
119
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: If you're under 6 feet, your relative strength is irrelevant
« on: March 21, 2011, 11:33:35 pm »
point taken
but if 6 foot under guys can't brag or anything about lifting, 6 foot over guys can't brag about dunking haha..
but yea people that don't see the difference just don't get it
but if 6 foot under guys can't brag or anything about lifting, 6 foot over guys can't brag about dunking haha..
but yea people that don't see the difference just don't get it
120
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: If you're under 6 feet, your relative strength is irrelevant
« on: March 21, 2011, 08:53:04 pm »
isn't 5 10 the american "normal height" thus 6-2 would be more abnormal than 5 8. Clearly height plays a role as do genetics, but dont dismiss someone's strength just because they are shorter. It still takes hard work to bench that much over your body weight I dont care how tall you are.
Besides that who cares what other people think or say, if you are getting stronger and beating your OWN PR's then thats all that matters not what some guy on youtube or forums says or brags about due to insecurities.
Besides that who cares what other people think or say, if you are getting stronger and beating your OWN PR's then thats all that matters not what some guy on youtube or forums says or brags about due to insecurities.