7
« on: August 12, 2015, 02:49:06 pm »
Hey Guys,
I want to hear your opinions on something that doesn't make too much sense to me...
Using a weight vest seems to be accepted as a beneficial way to train for a higher vertical jump, but take a look at this scenario:
Single leg bounds are great for single leg jumpers...
A weight vest does not allow you to jump as high on each bound, although power output may be equal because a lower height with more weight (vest on) is still similar to a higher height with less weight (no vest). If this leads to a lower height (with vest), than on the landings where a lot of the magic happens, you are absorbing a higher weight but from a lower drop height (essentially canceling each other out), which will be pretty much the same landing force of a lower weight (no vest) but from a higher drop height?
This to me seems like they are the exact same thing except that the weight vest can negatively affect movement efficiency so this 1 negative aspect equates to NOT using a weight vest as superior?
The only way I see using a weight vest as being useful is for immediate potentiation/STIM effects during a peaking phase. Doing 1 set of bounds with the vest on, and taking advantage of the CNS stim on the next set with the vest OFF (contrast sets).
What prompted me to wonder even more obsessively about this is that if my example of higher/lower drops higher/lower weight higher/lower jumps are all essentially the same, it didn't make sense that I have had more knee pain when I would go on blocks using a weight vest. If my earlier scenario is true, this increased knee pain can be explained by the vest decreasing movement efficiency, thus me performing the bounds more dangerously.
Another example would basically be if you master 18" depth jumps, would it be the same to increase the box height as staying on 18" but add weight?
Shit load of overthinking but I want to be as efficient as possible so what does everyone think?