« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Ben Johnson  (Read 32343 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9112
    • View Profile
    • Email
Ben Johnson
« on: March 28, 2010, 05:21:19 am »
0
box squatting 10 years passed his prime, pretty ugly 495:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-K5An8qf1Q&feature=related#t=2m42s
« Last Edit: March 28, 2010, 05:23:42 am by adarqui »
Logged

piR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 812
  • Respect: -144
    • View Profile
Re: Ben Johnson
« Reply #1 on: March 31, 2010, 07:36:43 pm »
0
Ouch, his fucking spine..
Logged

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9112
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Ben Johnson
« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2010, 07:47:13 pm »
0
Quote from: Rip on March 31, 2010, 07:36:43 pm
Ouch, his fucking spine..

i know right.. eek.. I can't imagine his 600 for 6, thought it might have been better than what we see in this vid, considering he was in his prime for 600x6.
Logged

piR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 812
  • Respect: -144
    • View Profile
Re: Ben Johnson
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2010, 08:02:28 pm »
0
Quote from: adarqui on March 31, 2010, 07:47:13 pm
Quote from: Rip on March 31, 2010, 07:36:43 pm
Ouch, his fucking spine..

i know right.. eek.. I can't imagine his 600 for 6, thought it might have been better than what we see in this vid, considering he was in his prime for 600x6.
Yeah, but the 600x6 was also when he was roiding
Logged

bball2020

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 644
  • Respect: +66
    • View Profile
Re: Ben Johnson
« Reply #4 on: April 01, 2010, 09:01:24 pm »
0
still impressive nonetheless
Logged

zgin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 847
  • Respect: +2
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Ben Johnson
« Reply #5 on: April 07, 2010, 02:51:50 pm »
0
was it 600x6 box squat?
Logged
37.5

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9112
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Ben Johnson
« Reply #6 on: April 07, 2010, 05:40:08 pm »
0
Quote from: zginphil on April 07, 2010, 02:51:50 pm
was it 600x6 box squat?

i'm not sure, judging from this video and the response of CF on his forum, I think it was box... He basically said something like, "ya but this wasn't ben in his prime, he squatted 600 x 6 in his prime", without clarifying it was normal atg etc, so i assume he box squatted it.

pc
Logged

LBSS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12979
  • plugging away...
  • Respect: +8042
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Ben Johnson
« Reply #7 on: April 07, 2010, 05:42:56 pm »
0
CF talks about the importance of the half-squat and not so much full squats. I get the impression that he doesn't really give a shit about ATG squats so I kind of doubt that the 600x6 was ATG.

Not that it matters, dude was still fast as hell.
Logged
Muscles are nonsensical they have nothing to do with this bullshit.

- Avishek

https://www.savannahstate.edu/cost/nrotc/documents/Inform2010-thearmstrongworkout_Enclosure15_5-2-10.pdf

black lives matter

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9112
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Ben Johnson
« Reply #8 on: April 07, 2010, 06:08:20 pm »
0
Quote from: LBSS on April 07, 2010, 05:42:56 pm
CF talks about the importance of the half-squat and not so much full squats. I get the impression that he doesn't really give a shit about ATG squats so I kind of doubt that the 600x6 was ATG.

Not that it matters, dude was still fast as hell.

ya, and most sprinters aren't going to have the best natural "ability" at ATG anyway, due to the leg length.

though, when most people think squat they automatically think "ATG", so, it's nice to clarify.
Logged

zgin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 847
  • Respect: +2
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Ben Johnson
« Reply #9 on: May 06, 2010, 11:13:21 pm »
0
Quote from: adarqui on April 07, 2010, 06:08:20 pm
Quote from: LBSS on April 07, 2010, 05:42:56 pm
CF talks about the importance of the half-squat and not so much full squats. I get the impression that he doesn't really give a shit about ATG squats so I kind of doubt that the 600x6 was ATG.

Not that it matters, dude was still fast as hell.

ya, and most sprinters aren't going to have the best natural "ability" at ATG anyway, due to the leg length.

though, when most people think squat they automatically think "ATG", so, it's nice to clarify.

squid= atg troll
zgin= fast ata

ata= ass to air

Logged
37.5
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »